Category Archives: English

Is Earth Egg Shaped as Per Qur’an?

Islamic scholars and apologists claim, “The Noble Quran is filled with scientific statements and notions.  These are statements of Allah Almighty describing how He created things on earth and in the Universe.  What’s most amazing is that all of these scientific statements and notions had been proven to be in perfect agreement with science and our modern-day scientific discoveries.  Allah Almighty made the Noble Quran be Prophet Muhammad’s (peace be upon him) Everlasting Divine Miracle and proof for Prophethood.  The Holy Book certainly stood the test of time 1,500 years ago with Its Claims, Prophecies and Miraculous language eloquence, and it does again and again in our day today with Its overwhelming agreement with science and discoveries that were not known to man 1,500 years ago.” [Source]

Earth is Egg Shaped as per Notable Islamic scholars like Zakir Naik

Earth is Egg Shaped as per Notable Islamic scholars like Zakir Naik

Let’s analyse this claim, in light of Lexicon Arabic Dictionaries, and narrations of Muhammad. I’ll start with quoting the verse, which claims earth to be egg shaped in Qur’an. See Qur’an Ch 79, Verse 30, which reads:-

Transliteration

Wal-arda baAAda thalikadahaha

Sahih International
And after that He spread the earth.

 I don’t know why Sahih International translates the word ‘Dahaha’ as Spread out here. They must have misunderstood the word, so we can rely on other Muslim Translators of Qur’an. Almost all other translation by Islamic scholars are as follows:

Muhsin Khan
And after that He spread the earth;
Pickthall
And after that He spread the earth,
Yusuf Ali
And the earth, moreover, hath He extended (to a wide expanse);
Shakir
And the earth, He expanded it after that.
Dr. Ghali
And the earth, after that He flattened it (for life).

 This is really amazing, why not a single Scholar translates the word as Egg Shaped or Spherical etc. But yes, we do have scholars like Dr. Zakir Naik, and Bassam Zawadi who do translates the word ‘Dahaha’ as egg shaped. Now, to know whether their claim is true or not, we have to rely on Qur’anic dictionaries and Lexicon Arabic Dictionaries. Lets see how Lane Lexicon dictionary explains this word Dahaha. See the explanation below:-

Daha (., MM_b;,, 1,) first pers. Dahouth aor, yad’hoo inf. N. dahoo He spread; spread out, or forth; expanded; or extended; (S, Msb, K; ) a thing; (K; ) and, when said of God, the earth; (Fr, S, Mb, 1V; ) As also daha first pers. dahaithu (K in art. daha) aor. yaad’heae inf. n. dahae: (Msb, and K in art. dahae : ) or He (God) made the earth wide, or ample; as explained by an Arab woman of the desert to Sh: (TA : ) also, said of an ostrich, (S, TA,) he expanded, and made wide, (TA,) with his foot, or leg, the place where he was about to deposit his eggs: (S, TA : ) and, said of a man, he spread, &c., and made plain, even, or smooth. (TA in art. dhaha) [Source]

So, it is not egg as Few Islamic apologists claim, it is the place which Ostriches expand or stretch to lay eggs.  Daha does not mean eggs of Ostrich, but yes it is the laying place of the egg. Other meanings as per this above quote is, He spread out, or forth, or Expanded etc. None of these meanings resemble to the shape of Earth. Another dictionary which is quoted by Answering-Christianity team, to prove the word ‘Daha’ mean ‘Egg Shaped’body is Lisan Al Arab. Let’s also see what this dictionary says.

Lisan Al Arab says:– الأُدْحِيُّ و الإدْحِيُّ و الأُدْحِيَّة و الإدْحِيَّة و الأُدْحُوّة مَبِيض النعام في الرمل , وزنه أُفْعُول من ذلك , لأَن النعامة تَدْحُوه برِجْلها ثم تَبِيض فيه وليس للنعام عُشٌّ . و مَدْحَى النعام : موضع بيضها , و أُدْحِيُّها موضعها الذي تُفَرِّخ فيه .ِ

English Translation:- Translation: Al-udhy, Al-idhy, Al-udhiyya, Al-idhiyya, Al-udhuwwa:The place in sand where an ostrich lays its egg. That’s because the ostrich spreads out the earth with its feet then lays its eggs there, an ostrich doesn’t have a nest.

The above definition, again support my claim. It proves that Daha is the place on Earth, where Ostriches lays egg. Now, we will see another dictionary. It is Wehr-Coman Dictionary, pg 273 . It says:-

Daha-  To spread out, flatten, Level,  unroll. Here is the proof.

Daha

I think it must be clear by now that this claim is a hoax by Islamic scholars to fool people, all the Arabic dictionaries translates the word ‘Dahaha’ referring to a flat surface. Even if we accept that the word ‘Dahaha’ means ‘Egg Shaped’ or ‘Ostrich Egg’, then see how drastically the meaning of the complete verse changes:

The verse in Arabic says: Wal-arda baAAda thalikadahaha (Let us break this verse, and read it word-to-word with its meaning)

wal-arḍa – And the Earth

baʿda – after

dhālika – that

daḥāhā – Egg Shaped (Ostrich Egg)

Does this verse make any sense? If yes, then keep believing that Earth is Egg shaped as per Quran, because we can only show some open minded, and rational people the truth. It is not for those who are brain washed by Zakir Naik.

Why I am not a Believer of Islam

I’ll start this article by quoting an Islamic site, which says that Islam is the only true religion,and mankind need to follow Islam for salvation. It further goes to claim that all child are born sinless and a Muslim. Later their environment leads to unbelief and adopt practices which contradicts Islam.

It further says “Islam is known not only as a rational and moral way of life prescribed for all of mankind, it is known by the term ‘Din ul-Fitra’ or ‘the natural religion’. Islam is the religion designed by the Creator of mankind for the benefit of mankind and therefore fits human nature perfectly. Being Muslim is living in harmony with your human nature.” [Islamic Org/ Why Islam] 

However, I find this contradictory with authority of Islam, i.e. Qur’an. Qur’an in many verses say, that Allah is the reason of disbelief, also we will try to find why we are Disbelievers, Polytheists, Idolaters, Atheists, Agnostics, etc, who are the prime target of Islamic Jihadist, who kill innocent people in name of Allah.

Allah in Quran says Qur’an 6:111 

Sahih International

And even if We had sent down to them the angels [with the message] and the dead spoke to them [of it] and We gathered together every [created] thing in front of them, they would not believe unless Allah should will. But most of them, [of that], are ignorant.

Allah in this verse says, that even if he makes dead speak to Unbelievers that, Allah is the true GOD, and Muhammad is his messenger and send Angels to testify the message of the Prophet, still no unbeliever is going to believe in Qur’an and Muhammad. Now the question in mind of readers would be why they are not going to believe it? The answer is very plain and simple, it is because it is Allah’s will, that the unbelievers will not believe in him and his Message (Qur’an).[Source]

Ibn Abbas explains this verse as follows:

(And though We should send down the angels) as they have asked and testified in favour of that which they denied (unto them) unto those who sneer, (and the dead should speak unto them) from their graves, as they asked, telling them that Muhammad is Allah’s Messenger and that the Qur’an is Allah’s speech, (and We should gather against them all things) of birds and beasts (in array) face to face, testifying that what We say is the Truth and affirming that which they have denied, (they would not believe) in Muhammad and the Qur’an (unless Allah so willed) that they believe. (Howbeit, most of them are ignorant) that it is the Truth from Allah.

On the very same verse, Ali Dashti in his book 23 years, page 41-42 writes:-

Such being the case, certain questions arise. If these people’s future unbelief and persistence in polytheism had already been preordained, what useful purpose had been served by God’s appointment of a man to preach to them and guide them aright? Can a useless action be attributed to God who is wise, omniscient, and infallible? Formalists, who reject the application of reason to religious questions, interpret the statement as an ultimatum or test intended to make humans aware that they are wicked and deserve punishment in the next life. This interpretation, however, is inconsistent with the immediately following words “unless God so willed” in the same verse 111. The inescapable conclusion is these people were not going to believe because God did not wish them to believe, and this is confirmed by the clear statement “We shall confuse their hearts and eyes” in verse 110. Earlier in the same sura 6 it is stated, in verse 107, that “If God had so willed, they would not have been polytheists.” God must therefore have willed that  they should be polytheists. Surely Almighty God’s humble creatures cannot change His will. Not even Mohammad could dissuade from polytheism those whose polytheism was caused by God’s will. The idolaters in question were not to blame. Why, then, were they threatened with punishment after death?

Indirectly, the all Knowing, Omniscient, Merciful God, says that he has proof and evidence to prove Qur’an being a true revelation from GOD, and Muhammad is his messenger. But he did not want to show those proof, because Unbelievers will not believe in him and his Message, because its not his will. Now guess what sense it makes, and why Qur’an was revealed to a Messenger, when it was already preordained that Non-Believers are not going to believe in it. This is not the only verse, which claims such thing. There are many more such verse. Let’s have a look on them too.

Qur’an 32:13 

Sahih International

And if we had willed, We could have given every soul its guidance, but the word from Me will come into effect [that] “I will surely fill Hell with jinn and people all together.

It is good to hear that Allah has already said that he will fill the Hell with Men and Jinns together, that is why he need not to guide all the souls. In other words, if he will guide all souls, they will all go to Heaven, with rest of Believers. In this case his words will become due, which he has already decided. That is why Allah will guide only a few and leave the rest for hell fires in hereafter. [Source]

It would have been a much better choice of Allah, if he had willed to make all mankind his believers. I leave it on readers to guess why he left us without guidance, which leads to Bloodshed, Terrorist activities, Love Jihad, Suicide Bombing etc. I will also add that this God is very Unjust and Cruel, he wants to sent us to hell, just to keep his words.

Lastly, I would like to draw attention of all the unbelievers to a verse of Qur’an, which declares fate of those who disbelief in Allah.

Qur’an 2:161-162

Sahih International

Indeed, those who disbelieve and die while they are disbelievers – upon them will be the curse of Allah and of the angels and the people, all together,

Sahih International

Abiding eternally therein. The punishment will not be lightened for them, nor will they be reprieved.

So, our fate is decided and we will abide in hell hereafter eternally. Allah and his Angels will curse us too for our disbelief. Even our good deeds of this life will not benefit us in day of Judgement. Unbelievers’ good deeds won’t be accepted on the Day of Judgement because they lack devotion and consistency which are fundamental in Islamic Canons.  Good deeds are null and void if they are not compatible with the Islamic rulings or if they lack sincerity.  Unbelievers’ deeds lack one or both of the two conditions which consequently puts their deeds much farther from being accepted. [Source] 

Anyways, I on behalf of all Disbelievers thanks Allah for not guiding us, and making us follower of a Terrorist Prophet and his violent and hatred preaching book, Qur’an. I am even thankful to Allah, that he will send us in hell, because it will be much better and peaceful place without believers (Muslims), as they will go in heaven.

DR AMBEDKAR ON ISLAM

pakistan or partition of india

DR AMBEDKAR IS REGARDED AS MOST POWERFUL VOICE OF DALITS IN INDIA.
HIS WORDS ARE TAKEN AS TAKE IT FOR FOR GRANTED BY EVERY DALIT OF THE COUNTRY.TODAY DALIT LEADERS ARE MORE INTERESTED IN POLITICS AND FILLING THEIR HOMES INSTEAD OF REAL DEVELOPMENT OF DALITS. SO THEY PLAYS CASTE BASED POLITICS AND THE LATEST ADDITION IS OF DALIT-MUSLIM NEXUS.

HOW DALITS COULD FORGET WONDEROUS TREATMENT BY FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM AGAINST HINDUS AND BUDDHISTS IN PAST?

HOW BUDDHIST DALITS COULD FORGET WIPE OUT OF BUDDHISM FROM AFGANISTAN, PAKISTAN, BANGALDESH BY MUSLIMS?

HOW COULD DALITS FORGET THE WORDS OF DR AMBEDKAR ON WONDEROUS TRATEMENT BY FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM AND JOIN THE DALIT BUDDHIST NEXUX?

FOLLOWING ARE THE QUOTES BY DR AMBEDKAR ON ISLAM

All quotations are from pakistan or the partition of india by Dr B.R.Ambedkar, 3rd edition ,1946 BAWS Vol. 8,1990 , govt of Maharashtra publication; previous name of the book: Thoughts on Pakistan
Hindu is a Kafir-Not worthy of respect-

“To the muslims, a Hindu (and any non-muslim) is a Kafir. A Kafir (non-believer in islam) is not worthy of respect. He is a low born and without status. That is why a country ruled by the Kafir (Non-muslim) is a Dar-ul-Harb (i.e. the land of war) to a Muslim, which must be conquered, by any means for the muslims and turned into Dar-ul-Islam (i.e. land of muslims alone). Given this, no further evidence seems necessary to prove that the muslims will not obey a Hindu (or for that matter any non- muslim) government ”
Ref-page 301

Brotherhood of muslims for the muslims only-

“Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between muslims and non-muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of islam is not the universal brotherhood of man.It is the brotherhood of muslims for muslims only. There is fraternity but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.
The second defect of islam is that it is a system of social self-government, because the allegiance of a muslim does not rest on his domicile in the country which is his but on the faith to which he belongs. To the muslim ibi bene patria is unthinkable. Wherever- there is the rule of islam, there is his own country.
In other words, Islam can never allow a true muslim to adopt india as his motherland and regard a hindu as his kith and kin. that is probably the reason why maulana Mahomed Ali, a great indian but a true muslim, preferred to be buried in Jerusalem rather than in India.’
(Ref-page 330-331)

Difficult to see difference between a communal and nationalist muslim:

“It is difficult to see any real difference between the communal muslims who form the Muslim league and the nationalist muslims. It is extremely doubtful whether the nationalist musalmans have any real community of sentiment, aim and policy with the congress which mark them off from the muslim league. Indeed many Congressmen are alleged to hold the view that there is no different between the two and that the nationalist muslim inside the congress are only an outpost of the communal muslims”
ref- page 408

Muslim invaders planted the seeds of Islam in India.

“The Muslim invaders, no doubt, came to India singing a hymn of hate against the hindus, but, they did not merely sing their hymn of hate and go back burning a few temples on the way. That would have been a blessing. they were not content with so negative a result. They did a positive act, namely, to plant the seed of islam. The growth of this plant is remarkable. It is not a summer sapling. It is as great and as stronger as an oak. Its growth is thickest in northern india. The successive invasions have deposited their ‘silt’ served as watering exercises of devoted gardners, its growth is so thick in northern india that the remnants of hindu and buddhist culture are just shurbs. Even the sikh axe could not fell this oak”
Ref page- 65

Muslim’s strategy in politics:

“The third thing that is noticeable is teh adoption by the muslims of the gangster’s method in politics. The riots are a sufficient indication that gangsterism has become a settled part of their strategy in polices”
Ref page- 269

Murderers are religious martyrs

“But whether the number of prominent Hindus killed by fanatic muslims is large or small mattes little. What matters is the attitude of those who count towards these murderes. The murderers paid the penalty of law where law is enforced. The leading moslems, however , never condemned these criminals. On the contrary, they were hailed as religious martyrs and agitation was carried on for clemency being shown to them. As an illustration of this attitude, one may refer to Mr. Barkat Ali , a barrister of Lahore, who argued the appeal of Abdul Qayum. He went to the length of saying that qayum was not guilty of murder of Nathuramal because his act was justifiable by the law of the Koran. This attitude of the moslems is quite understandable. what is not understandable is the attitude of Mr. Gandhi ‘

Ref page 157

Hindus and muslims are two distinct spiritual species from aspritual point of view, Hindus and Musalmans are not merely two classes or two sects such as protestants and Catholics or Shaivas and Vaishnavas. They are two distinct species.

page 193

Islam and Castism

“Everybody infers that islam must be free from slavery and caste. Regarding slavery nothing needs to be said. It stands abolished now by law. But while it existed much of its support was derived from islam and islamic countries.”
But if slavery has gone, caste among musalmans has remained, as an illustration one may take the conditions prevalent among the Bengal Muslims. The superintendent of the census for 1901 for the province of Bengal records the following interesting facts regarding the muslims of bengal:-

The conventional division of the Mahomedans into four tribes- sheikh, saiad, moghul and pathan- has very little application to this province (bengal). the mahomedans themselves recognize two main social divisions, (1) ashraf or sharaf and (2) ajlaf. ashraf means noble and includes all undoubted descendents of foreigners and converts from high castes hindus. all other mahamedans including the occupational groups and all converts of lower ranks ,are known by the contemptuous-terms. ‘ajlab’, ‘wretches’ or ‘mean people’: they are also called kamina or itar, ‘base’ or rasil, a corruption of rizal, “worthless’. in some places a third class, called arzal or lowest of all is added. With them no other mohomedan would associate, and they are forbidden to enter the mosque to use the public burial ground.
“within these groups there are castes with social precedence of exactly the same nature as one finds among the Hindus.”

1. ashraf or better class mahomedans.
(1) saiads (2) sheikhs (3) pathans (4) moghul (5) malik and (6) mirza

2. ajlaf or lower class mahomedans.
(1) cultivating sheikhs, and other who were originally hindus but do not belong to any functional group, and have not gained admittance to the ashraf community e.g. pirali and thakrai
(2) darzi, jolaha, fakir and rangrez
(3) brahi, bhathiara, cluk, chrihar, dai, dhawa, dhunia, gaddi, kalal, kasai, kula, kunjara, laheri, mahifarosh, mallah, naliya, nikari.
(4) abdal, bako, bediya, bhat , chamba, dafali,dhobi, hallam, mucho, nagarchi, nat, panwari, madaria,tuntia.

3. arzal or degraded class.
bhanar, halalkhor, hijra, kasbi, lalbegi, mougtra, mehtar.
similar facts from other provinces of India could be gathered from their respective census reports and those who are curious may refer to them. But the facts for Bengal are enough to show that the mahamoedans observed not only caste but also untouchability
page- 228-230

Muslim canon oppose social reform

The existence of these evils among the muslims is distressing enough. But far more distressing is the fact that there is no organized movement of social reform among the musalmans of india on a scale sufficient to bring about their eradication. The hindus have their social evils. But there is relieving feature about them namely, that some of them are conscious of their existance and a few of them are actively agitating for their removal. Indeed, they oppose any change in their existing practices. it is noteworthy that the muslims opposed the child marriage bill brought in the central assembly in 1930, whereby the age for marriage of a girl was raised to 14 and for a boy to 18 on the ground that it was opposed to the muslim canon law. Not only did they oppose the bill at every stage but that when it became law they started a campaign of civil disobedience against that act

Ref page-233

Muslim politicians oppose secular categories: “muslim politicians do not recognize secular categories of life as the basis of their politics because to them it means the weakening of the community in it fight against the hindus. The poor muslims will not join the poor hindus to get justice from the rich. Muslim tenants will not join hindu tenants to prevent the tyranny of the landlord. Muslim labourers will not join hindu labourers in the fight of labour against the capitalist. Why? the answer is simple. The poor muslims sees that if he joins in the fight of the poor against the rich, he may be fighting against a rich muslim. The muslim laborer feels that if he joins in the onslaught of labor against capitalist he will be injuring a muslim mill-owner. He is conscious that any injury to a rich muslim, to a muslim landlord or to a muslim mill-owner, is a disservice to the muslim community, for it is thereby weakened in outs struggle against the hindu community ”

Ref page -236

India cannot be common motherland of the hindus and muslims as per muslim laws:

According to muslim canon law the world is divided into two camps, dar-ul-islam (abode of islam) and dar-ul-harb (adobe of war). a country is dar-ul-islam when it is ruled by muslims. a country is dar-ul-harb when muslims only reside in it but are not rulers of it. that being the canon law of the muslims, india cannot be the common motherland of the hindus and the musalmans. it can be the land of the musalmans- but it cannot be the land of the ‘hindus and musalmans living as equals’. Further, it can be the land of the musalmans only when it is governed by the muslims. the moment the land become subject to the authority of a non-muslim power, it ceases to be the land of the muslims. instead of being dar-ul-islam it becomes dar-ul-harb.
I must not be supposed that this view is only of academic interest. For it is capable of becoming an active force capable of influencing the conduct of the Muslims.

Ref- page 294

Jihad to transform dar-ul-harb india to dar-ul-islam

It might also be mentioned that hijrat is not the only way of escape to Muslims who find themselves in adar-ul-harb. there is another injunction of Muslim canon law called jihad (crusade) by which it becomes incumbent on a Muslim ruler to extend the rules of Islam until the whole world shall have been brought under its sway. The world, being divided into two camps, dar-ul-islam (adobe of islam) , dar-ul-harb (adobe of war), all countries come under one category or the other. technically , it is the duty of the Muslim ruler, who is capable of doing so, to transform dar-ul-harb into dar-ul-islam.

The fact remains that India, if not exclusively under Muslim rule, is a dar-ul-harb and the musalmans, according to the tenants of Islam are justified in proclaiming a jihad.
The fact remains that India, if not exclusively under Muslim rule, is a dar-ul-harb and the muslamns, according to the tenets of Islam are justified in proclaiming a jihad.
Not only can they proclaim jihad but they can call the aid of a foreign Muslim power to make jihad success, or if the foreign Muslim power intents to proclaim a jihad, help that power in making its Endeavour a success.

Ref-page 295-296

Why is hindu-muslim unity a failure?

“The real explanation of this failure of hindu-muslim unity lies in the failure to realize that what stands between the Hindus and Muslims is not a mere matter of difference , and that this antagonism is not to be attributed to material cause. it is formed by causes which take their origin in historical, religious, cultural and social antipathy, of which political antipathy is only a reflection.”

Ref- page 329

Hindu-Muslim unity is out of sight

nothing i could say can so well show the futility of any hope of hindu-muslim unity. Hindu -Muslim unity up to now was at least in sight although it was like a mirage. Today it is out of sight and also out of mind. Even Mr. Gandhi has given up what, he perhaps now realizes, is an impossible task.

Ref- page 187

Transfer of minorities is the only remedy for communal peace.

“The transfer of minorities is the only lasting remedy for communal peace, is beyond doubt. if that is so, there is no reason why the Hindus and the Muslims should keep on trading in safeguards which have proved so unsafe. if small countries, with limited resources like Greece, turkey and Bulgaria, were capable of such an undertaking there is no reason to suppose that what they did cannot be accomplished by Indians”

The problem of majority-minority will continue

“the musalmans are scattered all over Hindustan-though they are mostly congregated in towns and no ingenuity in the matter of redrawing of boundaries can make it homogenous. The only way to make Hindustan homogenous is to arrange for exchange of population. Until that is done, it must be admitted that even with the creation of Pakistan, the problem of majority vs. minority will remain in Hindustan as before and will continue to produce disharmony in the body politic of Hindustan ”

 

GOD – His Nature and Attributes- Karam Narain Kapur

123

 

 

GOD – His Nature and Attributes- Karam Narain Kapur

From – Sublimity of the Vedas

  1. He (God) is all pervading, all powerful, bodiless faultless without sinews, holy and untouched by sin. He is omniscient, wise poet, self-existent and al encompassing. (Y 40:2)
  2. Whatever, animate and in animate, there is in this world, is pervaded by God (Yajur Veda 40-1)
  3. God, whose name and glory is great, has no image (Yaju 32;3)
  4. He (God) is our father and brother. He is the Controller of the Universe. He know all the worlds and objects, in Him the emancipated soul’s moves freely in the region free from wordily pleasures and pains. (Y 32:30)
  5. God is the cause of all the movements in this world, but He Himself remains unmoved. He is far away from the ignorant; but near at hand for the enlightened. He is within and without all the beings of this world ( Yaju 40:50)
  6. O Lord, Thou are to us as a father is to his son. May we attain thee. May you shower happiness on us. ( R 1:19)
  7. Thous are God of gods, a wonderful friend, life of all lives and glorious in this cosmic sacrifice. O Lord! May we live peacefully under thine extensive protection and may we never come to grief under thine friendship ( R 1:19:13)
  8. O Refuge of all, you are our Father and you are our Mother. Your are Lord of innumerable activities, we pray to you for your good wishes. (R 8:98:11)
  9. O Men! Know him as God (Indra) who stabilized the moving earth, who checks the eruption of volcanic mountains, who creates the vast space and who supports the heavens (A20:34:2).
  10. Singers sing your praise, worshippers and persons versed in Vedas worship you. O Lord of numerous activities! The learned accept you as the Most Exalted. (Rig, 1:10:1)
  11. All the deities find refuge in the All Powerful God. (A 13:3, 13:4)
  12. God is neither second, nor third, nor fourth nor fifth nor sixth nor seventh nor eight nor ninth nor tenth. That is, He is the First most exalted and unmatched. (A 13:4(2),16,17,18)
  13. God awards fruits of actions to the good and the evil doers alike (R,6:15;9)
  14. He (GOD) is dispenser of justice. He is most exalted; He is punisher of evil acts and is God of gods. ( A 13:4(1)4)

Religion of Shakti. By T. L. Vasvani.

sun

 

 

Religion of Shakti. By T. L. Vasvani.

 

Spirituality is not running away from “dharma” or life’s appointments and obligations. Spirituality is a conquest! Religion is not retreat. Religion is life. India went down in the day she separated religion from life. Shri Krishan’s message is not a creed of quietism of inaction. Spirituality is a Shakti. Religion is life of Atman. And all tasks are sacred which express the life, the Shakti, the energy of the Atman. Religion is not spiritual indulgence. Religion is active service inspired by reverence for GOD.

 

(1)     There is the God below you; (2) There is God above you; (3) There is the God within you. So you have the three duties. Dana, Yoga, tapas. By Dana is meant not merely the giving of some money in charity’ but the giving of love and sympathy. Dana is not mere alms-giving! Dana is not philanthropy! Dana is service inspired by reverence for the poor. Dana is worship of the poor. Charity given in pride or for show and self- advertisement is now Dana. Don’t patronize the poor, worship them! For they are of the Body of Shri Krishna, Give a fragment of yourself to the poor. One tear of prayer is more precious than ten thousand rupees of a rich man who gives with no reverence for the poor. ON their suffering alas! Is built the present order; and ‘civilization” sacrifices their life to the comfort and motor-cars of the rich. And when I speak of the ‘poor’ I include in that class, also, the “criminal” and the “fallen”. Regard the “criminal” also as a man and, therefore, as a God – suppressed. The prison system must be reformed. Criminals, too, are humans. And the “fallen ones? Did not Jesus bless them? And concerning Krishna we read that when a “harlot” was kissing his feet with her tears, the prices who were present were annoyed and they asked the Lord whey he allowed a fallen woman to “insult” Him thus. But He, the lord of Love, Smiled and answered them: – Disturb her not. She knows better than you! For she has faith and love! The “fallen”. Too, are humans the poor are the forms of lord. Not they only but, also, the lower animas. There are the sub human God. While the influence of Indian ideals is gradually growing upon groups of earnest men and women in the west, the concepts of the West are invading the minds of the Indian Youth; and I know of many today who argue that need flesh foods for health and strength. Do we really expect to buy health and happiness in the slaughter house? I ask all to give up meat and have love in their hearth for bird and beast. They too are our brothers in the one kingdom of life. The y too are to ascend the ladder of evolution. They too are rupas of the Lord of Love.

Yagnas I interpret as worship of God. Modern India alas! Has forgotten her God, and so we wander in weakness. Yagnas should be our daily duty. Prayer is mighty force a great Shakti.

 

Tapas is self-reverence, self-control. Tapas is the sacrifice asked of the youth. Yet so many to day run after luxuries. Bhoga not Brahmcharys is the ideal of may an Indian student of today. In this Triple Reverence- reverence for the sub human God, reverence for the Eternal Purusha and reverence for oneself and the powers within the self – in this Triple reverence is the essential message of Dharma – Yoga – the yoga of discipline and duty. It is the yoga the youth must practice to serve the nation and the lord.

Is there any peaceful verse in Quran?

0Quran-550x334-450x303Many Muslims as well as Non-Muslims quote some verses from Qur’an which preaches peace, and Non-Violence, while discussing Violent teaching of Islam. These people simply copy-paste from some Islamic site, which is a very desperate move to prove Islam is a Peaceful Religion. In this article I’ll show the real meaning of those so-called peaceful verses, using their context and the historical reasons behind the revelation of those alleged peaceful verse of Quran.

But let us see first, what mainly Islamic sites say about Qur’an and Peace. “Islam as a religion is totally committed to peace and security. It views with great contempt, breach of peace, anarchy, rioting and terrorism. Muslims as Ummah are a peace-loving community. Jehad under Islam is allowed subject to certain conditions.” [Daroolum-Deoband]

One another site says, “The very word ‘Islam’ (from the Arabic silm) connotes peace. According to a tradition of the Prophet, ‘Peace is Islam’ (Al-Bukhari). This means that peace is one of the prerequisites of Islam. Similarly, a Hadith states: A Muslim is one from whose tongue and hands people are safe. One of the attributes of God described in the Quran is‘As-Salam’, which means peace and security.’ That is to say that God’s Being itself is a manifestation of peace. Indeed, God is Peace (Al-Bukhari). In the Quran divine guidance is likened to the paths of peace. (5:16)” [Islam 101]

Before I proceed I would like to clear one misconception of Muslims and the author of above quote. It is not necessary that a man named ‘Satyavan’, which literally mean ‘Observer of Truth’, is truthful. In very same way it hardly matters what the word ‘Islam’ means, because its teaching, practices and actions of Muslim are incompatible with its meaning, i.e. peaceful. Leave aside the hadith example for now, because it is said that those Hadiths contradicts Quran are unauthentic, so by end of article readers will be convinced that the above quoted Hadith is unauthentic.

So by the above example, we see what Islamic scholar say about Islam and Peace, I agree there are very few verse which can be interpreted as peaceful verse in Qur’an. The very common verse which Muslims quote to prove Islam is a peaceful religion is2:256, which reads:-

Yusuf Ali

Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things.

This verse is usually quoted by Islamic scholar because it says ‘let there be no compulsion in religion.’ But this verse is not as peaceful as it sounds, and to prove it, let’s see the historical context of the verse. One of Islamic site explains this verse as following:-

The scholars explained that these two verses [10:99 and 2:256], and other similar verses, have to do with those from whom the jizyah may be taken, such as Jews, Christians and Magians (Zoroastrians). They are not to be forced, rather they are to be given the choice between becoming Muslim or paying the jizyah.

Other scholars said that this applied in the beginning, but was subsequently abrogated by Allaah’s command to fight and wage jihad. So whoever refuses to enter Islam should be fought when the Muslims are able to fight, until they either enter Islam or pay the jizyah if they are among the people who may pay jizyah. The kuffaar should be compelled to enter Islam if they are not people from whom the jizyah may be taken, because that will lead to their happiness and salvation in this world and in the Hereafter. Obliging a person to adhere to the truth in which is guidance and happiness is better for him than falsehood. Just as a person may be forced to do the duty that he owes to other people even if that is by means of imprisonment or beating, so forcing the kaafirs to believe in Allaah alone and enter into the religion of Islam is more important and more essential, because this will lead to their happiness in this world and in the Hereafter. This applies unless they are People of the Book, i.e., Jews and Christians, or Magians, because Islam says that these three groups may be given the choice: they may enter Islam or they may pay the jizyah and feel themselves subdued. ” [Source]

As we see in above explanation, that in verse 2:256, Allah is giving Non-Muslims a choice, between Islam or Jizyah, which Muslims say as  ‘No Compulsion in religion’. If the above given explanation is true then we can’t say that this verse is peaceful. Many Islamic scholars also believe that Qur’an 2:256 is abrogated by Qur’an 9:5-6, which clearly says Muslims to fight and kill the polytheists, and leave them when they become Muslim. There is a Hadith recorded in Sahih Bukhari, which also supports Quran 9:5-6, which reads:-

Volume 1, Book 2, Number 25:

Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:

Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”

So, we see that either the verse is abrogated by later revealed verse of sword, or does not mean the same which Muslims wants us to believe. Even the Sharia Law proves that, Muslims don’t practice this verse. Non-Muslims are not allowed to preach, build their House of Worship, or propagate their religion in Islamic country. [Source]

Another verse which is widely quoted by Muslims to prove that their religion support peace, and Non-Violence is Qur’an 109:6, which says:-

“For you is your religion, and for me is my religion.”

But when we look back into Historical Background of this verse, it again turns to be less polite verse, than it is said by Muslims. This verse was revealed when some Meccan leaders, Abu Jahl, Walid and others suggested compromise with Muhammad, and they said to Muhammad, that he can worship his God at the same time as the Meccan deities, or alternatively each year. [Historical Development of Qur’an, page 9]

They (Meccans) wanted peace from Muhammad, and wanted to create harmony among Muslims and Non-Muslims, but Allah instantly revealed this Chapter to reply those leaders, who demanded Harmony and Peace. So, as we see this verse is not peaceful, but was revealed to reply an offer made by Meccan leaders for peace.

Further regarding this verse, Ibn Abbas says:-

(Unto you your religion) of disbelief and ascribing partners to Allah, (and unto me my religion) Islam and faith in Allah. The verses of fighting then abrogated this and the Prophet (pbuh) did fight them’

So, even if we consider this verse peaceful, early Islamic scholars thinks says that this verse is abrogated, and prophet did fight those who did not accepted Islam.

The above quoted verse is followed by Qur’an 8:61, which says:-

 And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah . Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing.

Ibn Jalalayan in his explanation to this verse says:-

And if they incline to peace (read silm or salm, meaning, ‘settlement’), then incline to it, and conclude a pact with them: Ibn ‘Abbās said, ‘This has been abrogated by the “sword verse” [Q. 9:5]’; Mujāhid said, ‘This [stipulation] applies exclusively in the context of the People of the Scripture, for it was revealed regarding the Banū Qurayza; and rely on God, put your trust in Him; truly He is the Hearer, of words, the Knower, of actions.

So, again we reached to the same conclusion that even if handful of verses in Quran like 8:61, 2:256,109:6 etc are  peaceful verses, but they are abrogated by Qur’an 9:5. Finally we can say that the Peaceful verses in Qur’an are of Meccan period when Muhammad had very less followers, so Allah did not dared to reveal violent verses, and most of peaceful verses in Qur’an is abrogated by the verse of sword which was last to be revealed when Muhammad became strong, then Allah commanded Muslims to kill Non-Believers, until they embrace Islam or pay Jizyah, and feel themselves subdued. [Qur’an 9:5 and 9:29]

So the answer to the question: Is there any peaceful verse in Quran?

Ans: There were few peaceful verses in Quran revealed in Meccan period when Muhammad hardly had 70 followers, but later when he formed a monstrous army of hooligans ,marauders and raiders, then eventually Allah the shock puppet of Muhammad abrogated all the peaceful verses with the violent ones, and ordered Muhammad and his army to kill those who dared to be different in religious views. 

[subscribe2]

The Martyred Hero

swami shraddhanandji

By Prof S.N. Pherwani

  1. The first Impression
    That tall, commanding, noble figure, the Governor and Founder of the Gurukula, Mahaltma Munshiram – that was my first impression of Swami ji as I joined my work as profession at the Gurukul University, Kangri. Always accessible, affable, he had his own way to all human hearts that came in contact with him. Kula – Pita, the father of that family, the larger family of the teachers’ Home he had founded, he was such in fact and not only in name. The Brahmcharis as well as the workers could approach him at all times, lay their private and personal difficulties and distresses before them, and get soothing, satisfactory advice and aid from him. It was wonderful how he tried to mould the minds of this large mental progeny, to help their hearts and link their lives to larger ideals of service and sacrifice. His was a dedicated life, and his clarion call to all was to consecrate and dedicate their lives to service of the motherland.
  2. Deeper Significance
    Gradually the deeper significance of his life dawned on me, here was a living example of the Aryan Hindu plan of life- the four stages of Brahmcharaya, the student stage, Grihastha, the stage of householder, Vanprastha, the stages of the retired forest dwelling public worker – enlarging and extending the range of his domestic duties, providing material, mental, moral and spiritual fare for the children of all around him, and finally enlargement of life even beyond this narrow institutional range- country wide all-embracing care of the untouchable, uncared for the forgotten out-caste brothers and sisters of our Motherland, I met him when he was in Vanaprastha stage. His vitality and learning before witness to the embodiment in him of Bram-charya ideals. His message how the Brahmchari stage of life was to be lived, was there planned out in full details in Gurukula Programme. I witnessed his detached domestic relationship, the way he behaved with his family members during his Vanaprastha. I learnt from his life what real Vanaprasth should be – a dedication to larger civic ends and regional regeneration, social sanitation and self-preparation for Sanyas, the widest conceivable sphere of human service, I witnessed how he gradually outgrew the Vanaprastha stage, his mental struggles to dissent age and detach himself from his dearest creation, the Gurukula, and render himself free for a still larger sphere of service. I saw his triumphant entry into Sanyas – as Swami Shraddhanand. My relations wihhim continued to be of the happiest. We met off and on the Bombay. IN the days of Satyagrah I remember how he was in raptures when discussing with me Thureaus doctrine of civil disobedience as he had just come back from Sabarmati, there in his life I saw the truth of the poet.
    Grew old along with me,
    The best is yet to be
    The last of life,
    For which the first was made
    here were the two stages of Nivritti Marga, the spirit now using its earthly tabernacle its conserved and trained manhood and ripe experience of family life for larger regenerative ends. The Vanaprasthi Mahatma Munshiram the sanyasi Swami Shradhdanand are to me living realities the truth made visible of a glorious life plan for an all-round well lived life, May Arya Hindus all realize that at least the third quarter of a well lived life is for dedication to ends larger than the domestic for social and civic service and that beyond that lies further extensive of services and that beyond that lies further extension of service as true Sanyasi. Brahmcharya and sound education is the birth right of all sons and daughter of the should ordered self-controlled family life should be made possible for majority and that these thing should be we need revival of true Vanaprashta and Sanyas of the kind Swami Shradhanand exemplified in his life
  3. His crown of Martyrdom
    He lived in our hearts and the “Happy Warrior” at last got his crowing close, a glorious end to a life gloriously lived. The tangible and visible the perishable part of Swami ji was shot through by a fanatic, but his invisible and permanent essence remains. His martyrdom brings to life his life ideals in the hearts of multitude. He lives in the hearts of millions of his countrymen and will continued to live and inspire as objective life has closed a little earlier his subjective life has by that very fact taken a firmer footing. He occupied and will I am confident continue to occupy a prominent place in the glorious gallery of the great and good. To the calendar of great men has been added this great name and the Hall of Greatness is all the grander for the entry of this Hero the true Martyr Swami Shraddhanand .

SHUDDHI WORK OF THE ARYA SAMAJ

SHUDDHI WORK OF THE ARYA SAMAJ

water-purification

By Lala Lajpat Rai

“If we have sinned against the man who loves us, have ever wronged a brother, friend or comrade, have ever done an injury to the neighbor who ever dwelt With us, or even to a stranger, O Lord! Free us from the guilt to this trespass.” -R. v., 85, 7.

I. Reclamation and Conversion

Literally, Shuddhi means purification, but when used by Arya Samajists it includes also reclamation and conversion. The Arya Samaj, being a Vedic church, and as such a Hindu organization, engages in the work of reclaiming those who have left Hindu society, and it converts everyone who is prepared to accept its rehgious teachings. In this work it comes into direct conflict with the proselytizing work of the Musulman Mullah and the Christian missionary; the j Musulman fanatic and the Christian zealot hate it, but even the sober-minded moulvie and the broadminded Christian do not like it. Yet it has met with considerable success in reclaiming Hindus converted to other faiths, and in stemming the tide of conversion. But its greatest success lies in raising the

social status of the depressed classes among the Hindus and preventing them from leaving Hinduism and joining other religious denominations. About the reconversions the Census Commissioner of the United Provinces of Agra and Oude remarks : ” Special efforts are directed to the reconversion of converts from Hinduism to Christianity or Islam, while persons who are Christian or Mahomedan by birth are also occasionally converted.” ” . . . of such Mahomedan converts I have myself known at least one case, and others have occurred. There is a society affiliated to the Arya Samaj , which is known as the Rajput Shuddhi Sabha, >^ which has as its chief object the reconversion of Mahomedan Rajputs to Hinduism via the Arya Samaj. On a single day 370 such Rajputs were converted to Aryaism. In three years, between 1907 . and 1910, this  society claims to have converted 1,052 Musulman Rajputs.”^

2. Ceremony of Conversion

Another Census Commissioner of the same province (Mr. Burn, I.C.S.) says that “the ceremony of conversion is simple. The would-be Arya lives on milk alone for a period of fifteen days/ this being known as the Chandrain birt. The admission into the Samaj is made the occasion of a public meeting, at which the convert declares his adherence to the ten principles of the Samaj, a great homa sacrifice is performed, passages from the Vedas are recited, and the convert distributes sweetmeats to those present. “^ In some cases a certificate of Shuddhi is issued, which facilitates social intercourse with Hindus.

3. Depressed Classes

But the greatest interest is being taken in the social uplifting of the lower castes; this reclamation is taking two distinct lines : (i) the raising of the Status of castes not entitled to wear the sacred thread, by admitting them to that privilege ; and . (2) raising the untouchables to the rank of touchable, and educating them to higher social ideals, with a view to eventually raising them to social equality with other Hindus. This work is done by the Arya Samaj es as such, as well as by special organizations supported by the Arya Samaj and affiliated, directly or indirectly, to the latter. Two years ago the author delivered a speech on this subject as President of a large Conference, at the anniversary of the Gurukula at Hardwar, and discussed the question from three standpoints : from the point of view of the Hindu community ; as a question of all-Indian importance ; and in its humanitarian bearing. Discussing it from the all- India point of view, he said : ” It is to be remembered that national define has its origin in the oppression of others, and if we Indians desire to achieve national self-respect and dignity, we should open our arms to our unfortunate brothers and sisters of the depressed classes and help to build up in them the vital spirit of human dignity. So long as we have ^/l these large classes of the untouchables in this country we can make no real progress in our national affairs, for this requires a high moral standard ; and this is unthinkable where the weaker classes are unfairly treated. No man may build his greatness on his brother’s weakness; man shall stand or fall by his Own strength.”

As recently as December last the author again discussed the subject, as the President of another large Conference of the same nature at Karachi (Sindh).

In the course of this speech he remarked that ” the cause of the depressed classes combines in it the best of religion, the best of humanity, and the best of nationalism ; that it is a cause worthy of the best energies and the most strenuous efforts of a large number of India’s daughters and sons, such as believe that ‘ Life is a mission and duty its highest Law,’ and that the best fulfillment of that duty lies in the service and uplifting of those whom human tyranny and prejudices have put out of the pale of humanity, and who are unfortunately the victims of the idea that they deserve no better fate.”

“In my opinion,” continued the speaker, “no greater wrong can be done to a human being endowed with intellect than to put him into circumstances Which make him believe that he is eternally doomed to a life of ignorance, servitude, and misery, and that in him any sort of ambition for his betterment is a sin.

“No slavery is more harmful than that of mind, and no sin is greater than to keep human beings in perpetual bondage. It is bad enough to enslave people, but to create and perpetuate circumstances which prevent them from breaking their chains and becoming free, is infamous. No man or number of men has a right to do this, and they deserve the severest condemnation of all who have a conscience. It is my firm conviction that injustice and oppression of fellow-men, the attempt to stifle legitimate human ambition, the desire to keep people down in order to profit by their misfortune, is sure to react on the authors and agents thereof, and that nothing can save them from a similar fate sooner or later except a timely consciousness of the gravity of their sin and a vigorous attempt to atone for it by undoing the mischief wrought.

” I am a Hindu and a firm behever in the doctrine of Karma. I also behave that every man makes his own Karma, and is thus the arbiter of his own destiny. I therefore look at the question thus: the ancestors of the Hindus (or perhaps they themselves in their previous existence), in the insolence of wealth and power maltreated people whom God had placed under them to protect and bless. The degradation of the latter reacted upon them and reduced them to the subordinate position which has been their lot for so many centuries, without in any way benefiting those who had already been degraded by them. This double degradation has resulted in the loss of the manly instincts of the race ; and we find that, despite a strong and sincere desire to improve, we feel as if the wheels of progress are kept back by forces beyond our control. The highest interests of the nation therefore require that the best in us should be devoted to the undoing of the mischief wrought by us or our ancestors. We owe a heavy debt to those depressed classes; that debt must be paid, and paid as soon as possible. No amount of paper resolutions and no amount of talking on platforms will make us men unless we adopt the first principle of manhood, viz., of making the amended honorable to those of our own people whom we have wronged and whom we continue to wrong under an entirely mistaken idea of our dignity and social position. Living in the midst of large classes of people not conscious of their manhood, we cannot hope to progress towards a better type ; a man Having in an atmosphere of infectious disease has to keep up constant war lest the germs of disease get admittance into his body and destroy it. At the best, action in such circumstances can only be preventive and not operative: our work for ourselves can only be negative and not affirmative. Even if we succeed in avoiding infection, that does not mean much, as our time is spent in preventive measures without making advance. We have, therefore, to realize that the best and highest sacrifices we may put forth for our national advancement cannot come to much as long as the depressed classes remain what they are. The question then, is one of national importance, and one which deserves to be placed almost at the head of the list of reforms needed to bring about our social efficiency. It is not a question of charity or goodwill but one of National self-preservation. I have so far looked at it from humane and national points of view, but there is another aspect which Hindus cannot ignore. The depressed classes or the vast bulk of them, are Hindus; they worship Hindu gods, observe Hindu custom, and follow the Hindu law. A great many of them worship the cow and obey their Brahman priests. They have no desire to go out of Hinduism unless it be impossible for them otherwise to better their position reugiously, socially, and Economically. Nay, they cling to Hinduism in spite of the knowledge that by giving it up and adopting other faiths they have an immediate prospect of Rising both socially and economically. There are agencies prepared to receive them with open arms if only they give up their ancestral faith, of which they Know little, and whose priests care so little for them. Indications are not wanting that many of them have already become conscious of the wretched position they hold in Hindu society. Some have begun to resent it, and it will be no wonder if large numbers of them leave Hindu society with thoughts of retaliation and revenge. Hindu society is in a state of transition, and is throwing off the accretions that have gathered round it in times of stress and trouble. With the advance of education and under modern influences, striking changes are taking place in the ideals and modes of life and thought of the society. The great majority of educated Hindus think that their progress, even on the most advanced modem lines, does not necessitate their giving up their religion or its forms, or even the mainsprings of their life as Hindus. If so, it is a question of paramount importance to Hindu society, that all those who call themselves Hindus should not only be properly educated, but that each member should have the consciousness that there is no position in society to which he cannot aspire if he is otherwise fitted for it by personal qualifications. No society can hold its own in these days of universal competition and education if it does not allow its members the fullest scope for progress. “Modern societies go further; they not only allow the fullest scope to their members but they have also to find opportunities tor progress. According to sound social conceptions, there cannot be much hope for a society which keeps a fourth of its total strength in perpetual bondage, doomed to dirty work, insanitary life, and intellectual starvation, and denies them opportunities of association with other members of the community. I am not prepared to admit that such a state of things forms an essential feature of Hinduism; it is enough to shame us that it should be associated with present day Hinduism.

Happily there is some awakening among the leaders of orthodox Hinduism also. The famous Gait Circular proved a good tonic for the apathy of orthodox Kashi. One fine morning the learned pandits of Kashi rose to learn that their orthodoxy stood the chance of losing the allegiance of six cores of human beings who, the Government and its advisers were told, were not Hindus, in so far as other Hindus would not acknowledge them as such, and would not even touch them. The ways of Providence are strange and inscrutable. The Gait Circular had a quite unexpected effect and galvanized the dying body of orthodox Hinduism into sympathy with its untouchable population, because that was so necessary to avert its own downfall. The possibility of losing the untouchables has shaken the intelligent section of the Hindu community to its very depths, and were it not for long established prejudices and deep-rooted habits, the untouchableness would soon be a thing of the past. The danger having been removed of Hinduism being bereft of the depressed classes by the fiat of the Census Department, there is a chance of Hinduism reverting to its old apathy and indifference, and against this the leaders and well-wishers of the Hindu community have to guard. From the Hindu point of view too, then, the matter is of first-rate importance and cannot be ignored without serious loss to the body and soul of Hinduism. I would, therefore, appeal to every Hindu to be serious about it ; this is no time for trifling. The Christian missionary is gathering the harvest and no blame can attach to him for doing so. He is in this country with the message of His God, and if the Hindus forsake their own people, he, in any case, will not fail them. The depressed classes, as I have said, have no desire to leave Hinduism, if the latter make it possible for them to progress on humane lines; but if in its stupidity it hesitates and hesitates, they are not willing to follow in its train any longer.”

The following extract gives an account of what has so far been done by the Arya Samaj in this connection:

“. . . In the Punjab and the United Provinces substantial work is being done by the Arya Samaj. In my eyes the chief merit of this work Hes in forcing or persuading Hindu society to assimilate these classes and raise them to a respectable position in the social scale. From that point of view the methods of the Arya Samaj are much more effective than those adopted in other parts of India. The Arya SamajISTS  occupy an admittedly good position in Hindu society. The orthodox party often threatens to outcaste them, but eventually find that it is not in their power to do so. In fact they cannot afford to lose them: Hinduism in Northern India cannot be thought of without the Arya Samaj. It is not only a source of strength to Hinduism and Hindus, but is the Principal effective agency, always and everywhere present, to defend them, to save them, and to serve them. It is the Arya Samajists who open and maintain schools, colleges, Vidyalas, and Gurukulas for the education of their boys and girls ; it is they who fight their religion.- and denominational battles, who defend their Shastras, who serve them in times of famine or distress, who look after their womanhood,  and who spend money, time, and energy in  reclaiming those who would otherwise be lost to them. The orthodox are angry with the Arya Samaj on account of their audacity in admitting some of the depressed classes and untouchables into Hindu society. They threaten to excommunicate and in some cases they carry out their threats, but eventually find it is useless to break their heads against rocks. In their despair, they pour out the vials of their wrath upon the untouchables and persecute them, but at this stage the law steps in and they have to submit to the inevitable.

” The Arya Samajists reclaim these depressed classes by admitting them to the privileges of the  Dwijas. They administer Gayatri to a select number, invest them with the sacred thread, confer on them the privilege of performing Homa, and start inter-dining and in a few cases even inter-marriage with them. This startles the Hindus. The whole country where such a thing is done for the first time is thrown into convulsions. People begin to think and talk. Occasionally they resort to violence which in some cases leads to litigation, but eventually truth, justice and perseverance triumph. In the territories of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir the whole strength of one of these castes (in one pargana), about 10,000 souls, has been admitted into the Arya Samaj. This is the result of about three years’ work. The agitation is now subsiding and things are resuming their normal condition. In another district (Sialkote) over 36,000 of another caste have been similarly raised. A special organization has been formed to look after their education, etc., called the Megh Udhar Sabha (a society for the uplift of Meghs), which maintains a Central School and several primary schools. The Central School has a splendid building of its own, the foundation stone of which was laid by the Collector of the District, and on which they have spent some forty thousand rupees. In Another district (Gurdaspur) Pandit Ram Bhaj Dat has reclaimed several thousands  within the last two years. The orthodox party is still agitated there, and no organization has yet been formed to look after those reclaimed. In another district (Hoshiarpur), thousands have been reclaimed and there is a regular organization looking after their educational and other needs. In Lahore itself good work is being done among Hindu sweepers and Chamars. In July, I purchased a large plot of land at Lahore on the other side of the Ravi, at a cost of Rs. 21,000, to build a Central Home and a Central School for the Depressed Classes Mission. We have used a portion of the balance of the famine fund, raised by me in 1908, towards the uplift of the depressed classes, and are maintaining some Primary Schools scattered over the province for the benefit of these classes. Some of these are receiving Government grants and others will soon earn them. The funds thus released will then be available for other schools. There is hardly a district in the province where some work in connection with the uplift of the depressed classes is not being done, though in most cases it only forms part of the general programmed of the Arya Samaj. But  the best and most cheering part of this work is that in some places the orthodox party have become conscious of their duty towards the depressed classes and are in full sympathy with the Arya Samaj. At the last session of the Punjab Hindu Conference, at the suggestion of a Hindu Sadhu of the orthodox party, a resolution was unanimously passed to invite the depressed classes to send representatives to the Conference in future. In Lahore and some other places we find that high caste Hindus have no scruples in sending their children to the schools which we maintain mainly for the depressed classes.

The children mix quite freely and on equal terms. In the U. P., the home of Hindu Orthodoxy, the work is more difficult; but last year I succeeded in making a big hole in the orthodox fortress by reclaiming a number of Domes (one of the lowest untouchable castes in the U.P.) and admitting them into the Arya Samaj. I went to their house in the interior of the hills and along with a number of high caste Arya Samajists ate food cooked by them and drank water brought by them. Last year I went to Benares and in that very centre of Hindu orthodoxy addressed a huge meeting on this question, and challenged the pandits to outcaste me and others working with me. I did the same only lately at Muradabad and Bareilly. The Arya Samajists in these districts are maintaining a number of schools for the Chamar boys, who alone number 60 lacs in the United Provinces. The untouchables in the U. P. number about a crore and a quarter in a total Hindu population of about four crores, and the problem there is gigantic. The great need in those provinces is a mission solely devoted to the work, consisting of good Hindus, who really believe in the Hindu Shastras and have a genuine respect for Hindu life and thought.” These extracts give a fair idea of the influence of the Arya Samaj in the sphere of social uplift . It is a magnificent work, of which any single Indian organization may well be proud. But no one feels more than we do how little has yet been achieved in this line. We are yet only on the fringe of the area to be conquered, and many a battle will have to be fought before the victory is achieved. The Arya Samaj as a body is, however, conscious of the magnitude as well as of the importance of the work, and their success is, humanly speaking, almost certain. Their feeling may well be expressed in the words of the poet

:It may be that the gulfs will wash us down

:It may be we shall touch the Happy Isles,. . . but something ere the end, Some work of noble note, may yet be done.

—Tennyson, Ulysses.

The Assassin

Somehow to Abdul Rashid is being given credit for what he as an ordinary man could never have done. He owed no grudge to Swami Shraddhananda. The latter had done him no personal wrong. Till before the Counsel for him disillusioned him under the awe of legal justice, he is reported to have been proud of what he regarded to be greatest service he could have done to his religion.

And how do his co-religionists take it? We thought it was a misguided editor who justified the deed of Abdul Rashid as being in accordance with Islamic Law. The other day in a mass meeting in Lahore, speaker after speaker condemned Shraddhananda instead of Abdual Rashid for the murder. One went so far as to say that under a Muslim Government the sword ( it was a revolver which in the flow of Urdu oratory was termed sword) which killed Shraddhananda or a man like him should have been kissed with reverence and affection. Another, to match presumably the exhortation of Arya Samajists that the blood of the martyr will prove prolific in producing a corps of Shraddhanandas, declared that if Aryas persisted in their course, thousands of Abdul Rashidswould  forthcoming. The desire of the two communities will thus be most befittingly met.

One who has gone through Islamic literature will not be surprised at this ebullition of fanatic feeling. The tendency to kill non – Islamwith the sword dates from the time of Mohammad. We reproduce below a few of the commandments of the Quran in this regard with authoritative orthodox comment thereon and shall supplement these divine behests with quotation from books containing traditions of Prophet and excerpts from books of Islamic law governing Mohammadan jurisprudence to day.

  1. O! those who believe? If anyone you turn away from his faith, well, God will send a people whom you will love and who will love you (Quran VI54) The Wuran appears to have omitted to the state here what to do with the apostate. He was presumably to be left to his fate. Commentators on the Quran however fill up the gaps says Bezavi: God gave tidiings of these happenings before they took place. These tribes apostatized towards the end of Mohammad’s life. One of them was BanuMudlaj… The chief was killed by FairozBailami in the night of the prophet’s death. The news was carried to the prophet and Mohammadans rejoiced. Similar also was the fate of other tribes which Bezavi narrates in the lines that follow. In the verse that follows the Quran is itself explicit:- and if they turn away (from their faith), take hold of them and kill them where you find them (IV-89-9- and if they turn away (from their faith), take hold of them and kill them where you find them (IV-89-9- and if they turn away (from their faith), take hold of them and kill them where you find them (IV-89-9- and if they turn away (from their faith), take hold of them and kill them where you find them (IV-89-90) No comment is deeded on this passage. The words enclosed within brackets are taken from Bezavi to make the meaning of the text clear. The former of theses versed is explained in Bukhari, whose place among the collectors of traditions is foremost. In the chapter bearing on the Acceptance or Non acceptance of Repentance from Apostates this verse is quoted as deciding this important issues. Difference of opinion is shown to exist among alumni as to the final decree to be based on of the injunction of verses. That the apostate should be murdered all are unanimous. Whether to give him three days respite and allow him to recant if the will is the pint at issue. Dar Qitni is said to have reported on the authority of Jabir that the prophet ordered the murder of a woman who apostatized in his life time. A few pages further a man is stated to have come to th Prophet to take with him the governor whom the latter appointed over the province of Yaman. Moaz was sent to fill that office and as he saw a man bound hand and foot and learnt on inquiry that he was an apostate from Islam he refused to sit till the later was murdered as this he said was the behest of Allah and the Prophet.

  2. The same stories are repeated in other book of traditions. Asection among Mohammadans aver that these commandments and decisions brutal on the face of them were dictated by the exigencies of time which to day do not exist. We regard the whole Quran to have been dictated by exigencies of time which too fortunately do not exist today. The pity is that Mohammadan priests whose writings have regulated Mohammadan jurisprudence till this time and whose interpretation of Mohammadan law governs even today all codes of judicial laws for Mohammandans have perpetuated these exigencies into eternal demand of God appointed law. An excerpt from Hedaya will be found to the point. The compilation of this book does not belong to the age of Mohammad but to an age centuries later. Mohammadan low is even today framed in accordance with the decree of this book.

“when a mussulman apostatizes from the faith an exposition thereof is to be laid before him in such a manner that if his apostasy should have raised from any religious doubts or scruples those may be removed. The reason for laying an exposition of the faith before him is that it is possible some doubts or errors may have arisen in his mind. Which may be removed by such exposition and as there are two modes of repelling the sin of apostasy namely destruction or Islam and Islam is preferable to destruction the evil is rather to be removed by means of an exposition of the faith is not incumbent according to what the learned have remarked upon this head (since a call to the faith has already reached the apostate.)
“as apostate is to be imprisoned for three days; within which time if he returns to the faith it is well but if not he must be slain. It is recorded in the Jam’s Sagheer that ‘an exposition of the faith is to be laid before an apostate and if he refuses the faith he must be slain and with respect to what is above stated that he is to be imprisoned for three days, it only implied that if he requires a delay three days must be granted him as such is the term generally admitted and allowed for the purpose of consideration. It is recorded from Hanifa and AbouJusef that the granting of a delay of three days is land able whether that apostate requires it or not and it is recorded from Shafai that is not lawful for him to put th apostate to death before that lapse of this time . since it is most problem that a Mussulman will not apostatize but from some doubt or error arising in his mind; wherefore some time is necessary for consideration and this is fixed at three days. The arguments of our doctors upon this point are two fold. First God says in the Koran “Slay the unbeliever” without any reserve of a delay of three days being granted to him and the Prophet has also said “Slay the man who change his religion” without mentioning anything concerning a delay. Secondly an apostate is an infidel enemy who has received a call to the faith wherefore he may be slain upon the instant without any delay. An apostle is termed on this occasion an infidel enemy because he is undoubtedly such and he is not protected since he has not required a protection neither is he a Zimmee because capitation tax has not been accepted from him hence it is proved that he is an infidel enemy. It is to be observed that in these rules there is not difference made between an apostate who is a freeman and one who is a slave as the arguments upon which they are established apply equally to both description.

 

If an apostate dies or be slain in his apostasy his property acquired during his profession of the faith goes to his heirs who are Mussulman and whatever he acquired during the apostasy is public property of community of Mussulmans that is it goes to the public treasury. This is according to Hanifa….

All acts of an apostate with respect to his property such as purchases sale manumission mortgages and gift done during his apostasy are suspended in their effect. If therefore he becomes a Mussalman those acts are valid but if he dies or be slain or desert into a foreign country those acts are null.

“if any person kills an apostate before an exposition of the faith has been laid open to him. It is abominable that is it is laudable to let him continue unmolested. Nothing however is incurred by the slayer because the infidelity of an alien(?) renders the killing of him admissible and an exposition of the faith after a call to the faith is not necessary.

“ if a Mussulman woman becomes an apostate she is no put to  death but is imprisoned until she returns to the faith. Shafei maintains that she is to be put to death because of the tradition before cited and also because as men are put to death for apostasy solely for this reason that it is a crimes of great magnitudes and therefore requires that its punishment to proportionately savers (namely, death) so the apostasy for woman being likewise (like that of a man ) a crime of great magnitude it follows that her punishment should be the same at that of a man.

“if a husband and wife both apostatize and desert to a foreign country and the woman becomes pregnant there and brings forth a child and to this child another child be afterwards born and the Mussulman troops then subdue the territory the child and the child both are plunder and the property of the state the child is so  because as the apostate mother is made a slave her child is so likewise as a dependent on her and the child’s child is so because he is an original infidel and an enemy and as an original infidel is fee or the property of the state so is he woman’s child may moreover be compelled to become a Mussulman but not the child’s child. Hassan records from Haneefa that compulsion may be used upon the child’s child or so to make him embrace the faith as a dependent of the grandfather.

Our last quotation is from Sir Abdul Rahim’s Mohammedan Jurisprudence a recent complain which may be fairly thought to represent sound Muslim opinion as to the award of Islam in all matters of vital importance to that faith.

Apostasy  or change of faith from Islam to infidelity places the apostate outside the protection of law. The law however by way of indulgence gives the apostate a certain locus penitential. For instance he will be first asked to conform to the faith and if he entertains any doubt efforts must be made to remove it by argument he will be given an option of three days to re embrace the faith before the sentence is passed on him . but since by the very fact of apostacy a man losses the protection of law, if even before the chance of re embracing the faith has been given to him a Muslim kills an apostate it will be considered as an improper act but he would incur no penalty of the law. So long as the sentence has not been passed on an apostate he will be allowed according to the two disciple to retain possession of this property but according to Abu Hanfait passes to his heirs at the instance of apostacy.

Shraddhananda was surely not an apostate but a potent instigator to the crime (?) no doubt. Maulana Abdul Bari on the occasion of the Unity Conference which was a sequel to Mahatma Gandhi’s 21stdays fast id Delhi, demanded that apostacy from Islam should be punished also in India if not with death with at least imprisonment as it is in the Bhopal State.

What the advocates of religious liberty both Muslim and Non Muslim have to fight is this barbarous attitude of Islamic jurisprudence and not an individual Abdul Rashid who like millions of his misguided brethren is a victim of blind faith and deserves our pity rather than contempt and indignation.