Tag Archives: Quran

कुरआन के नामकरण में गफलतबाजी

लेखक -देव प्रकाश
मुस्लिम विद्वान जलालुद्दीन सिद्दीकी ने अपनी पुस्तक तफसीर इत्तिकान में कुरआन और सूरतो के नाम के सम्बन्ध में चर्चा की है ,कि खुदावन्द ने अपनी पुस्तक के नाम उनके विपरीत रखे |
इसी पुस्तक में कुरआन के ५५ नाम लिखे है – तफसीर इत्तिकान ,प्रकरण १७ पेज १३२-३४
मुजफ्फरी के अनुसार अबूबकर ने कुरान को जमा किया तब लोगो ने इसका नामकरण करने को कहा तो किसी ने इंजील कुछ ने सफर नाम सुझाया लेकिन अबूबकर ने इब्ने मसूद के प्रस्ताव से नाम मुसहिफ़ रख दिया |
इसी प्रकार इब्ने अश्त्ता किताबुल मुसहिफ़ में मूसा बिन अकवा के आधार पर इब्ने शहाब की रवायत की अबू बकर ने सम्मति से मुसहिफ़ नाम रखा |
व्याख्याकार लिखता है कि अबूबकर वह प्रथम व्यक्ति थे जिन्होंने कुरआन को संकलित कर उसका नाम मुसहिफ़ रखा |
– तफसीर इत्तिकान ,प्रकरण १७ पृष्ठ १३७
इस विषय पर हमने कुरआन के ५५ नाम फिर अबू बकर द्वारा मुसहिफ़ नाम रखना बताया अगले पोस्ट में इस विषय पर अन्य प्रमाणों के साथ कुरआन के नाम का कौल लिखेंगे | इन बातो से यह स्पष्ट है कि अबूबकर तक मुसलमान कुरआन का नाम ही निश्चय नही कर पाए थे ,और अगली पोस्ट में स्पष्ट करेंगे कि कुरआन का कुरआन नाम यहूदियों से लिया गया है | जिस पुस्तक का नाम ही निश्चय करना इतना मुश्किल रहा वो भला ईश्वरीय ग्रन्थ कैसे स्वीकार जा सकता है ?( शेष ……….

प्रारम्भ ही मिथ्या से – पंडित चमूपति जी

  प्रारम्भ ही मिथ्या से
वर्तमान कुरआन का प्रारम्भ बिस्मिल्लाह से होता है I सूरते  तौबा  के अतिरिक्त और सभी  सूरतों का प्रारम्भ में यह मंगलाचरण  के रूप में पाया जाता है ई यही नहीं इस पवित्र वाक्य का पाठ मुसलामानों के अन्य कार्यों के प्रारम्भ करना अनिवार्य माना गया है ई
ऋषि दयानंद  को इस कलमे ( वाक्य ) पर दो आपत्तियां है I प्रथम यह कुरआन के प्रारम्भ में यह कलमा परमात्मा की ओर से प्रेषित ( इल्हाम ) नहीं हुआ है I दूसरा यह की मुसलमान लोग कुछ ऐसे कार्यों में भी इसका पाठ करते है जो इस पवित्र वाक्य के गौरव के अधिकार क्षेत्र नहीं I
पहेली शंका कुरआन की वररण शैली के ओर ईश्वरी सन्देश के उतरने से सम्बन्ध रखती है I हदीसों ( इस्लाम की प्रामाणिक शुर्ति ग्रन्थ  ) में वरनन है कि सर्वप्रथम सूरत ” अलक” कि प्रथम पांच आयतें परमात्मा कि ओर से उतरी है I हज़रात जिब्रील ( ईश्वरीय दूत ) ने हज़रात मुहम्मद से कहा
” इकरअ बिइसमे रब्बिका अल्लज़ी खलका “
 पद ! अपने परमात्मा के नाम सहित जिसने उत्पन्न किया I इन आयतो के पश्चात सूरते मुजम्मिल के उतरने की साक्षी है I  इसका प्रारम्भ इस प्रकार हुआ
                       ” या अय्युहल मुजम्मिलो ‘
                          ये वस्त्रों में लिपटे हुए !
 ये दोनों आयतें हज़रात मुहम्मद को सम्बोधित की गयी है I  मुसलमान ऐसे सम्बोधन को या हज़रात मुहम्मद के लिए विशेष भक्तो के लिए सामान्यतया नियत करते हैं I  जब किसी आयत का मुसलामानों से पाठ ( किरयात ) करना हो तो वह इकरअ ( पद / रीड ) या कुन ( कह ) भूमिका इस आयत के प्रारम्भ में ईश्वरीय सन्देश के इक भाग के रूप में वररन किया जाता है I यह है इल्हाम ईश्वरीय
सन्देश कुरआन की वररणशैली जिस से इल्हाम प्रारम्भ हुआ था I
अब यदि अल्लाह
को कुरआन के इल्हाम का प्रारम्भ बिस्मिल्लह से करना होता तो सूरते अलक के प्रारम्भ में हज़रात जिब्रील ने बिस्मिल्लाह पढ़ीं होती या इकरअ के पश्चात बीस्मेरब्बिका
के स्थान पर बिस्मिल्लाहिर्रहमनिर्हिम  कहा होता I
मुजिहुल कुरआन में सूरत फातिहा की टिप्पणी पर जो वर्तमान कुरआन की पहली सूरत है लिखा है –
 यह सूरत अल्लाह साहब ने भक्तो की वाणी से कहलवाई है की इस प्रकार कहा करें I
यदि यह सूरत होती तो इसके पूर्व कुल ( कह ) या इकरअ ( पढ़ ) जरूर पड़ा जाता I
 कुरआन की कई सूरतों का प्रारम्भ स्वयं कुरआन की विशेषता से हुआ है I  अतएव सूरते बकर के प्रारम्भ में जो कुरआन की दूसरी सूरत प्रारम्भ में ही कहा –
 ‘ जालिकल किटबोला रेबाफ़ीहे , हुडान लिलमुक्तकिन “
 यह पुस्तक है इसमें कुछ संदेह ( की सम्भावना ) नहीं ! आदेश करती परेहजगारों ( बुरियो से बचने वालों ) को I  तफ़सीरे इक्तकिन ( कुरआन भाष्य ) में वर्णन है की इब्ने मसूद अपने कुरआन में सूरते फातिहा को सम्मिलित नहीं करते थे I  उनकी कुरआन के प्रति का प्रारम्भ सूरते बकर से होता था I वे हज़रात मुहम्मद के विश्वस्त मित्रोँ ( सहाबा  ) में से थे I कुरआन की भूमिका के रूप में यह आयत आयत जिसका हमने ऊपर उल्लेख किया है ! समुचित है l  ऋषि दयानंद ने कुरआन के प्रारम्भ के लिए यदि इसे इल्हामी ( ईश्वरीय रचना ) माना जाए यह वाक्य प्रस्तावित किये है l यह प्रस्ताव कुरआन की अपनी वर्णन शैली  के सर्वथा अनुकूल है ओर अब्ने मसूद इस शैली को स्वीकार करते थे l मौलाना मुहम्मद अली अपने अंग्रेजी कुरआन अनुवाद में पृष्ठ ८२ पर लिखते हैं –
कुछ लोगो का विचार था की बिस्मिल्लाह जिससे कुरआन की प्रत्येक सूरत प्रारम्भ हुई हैं , प्रारम्भिक वाक्य ( कलमा ) के रूप में बढ़ाया गया हैं यह इस सूरत का भाग नहीं l
इक ओर बात जो बिस्मिल्ला के कुरआन शरीफ में बहार से बढ़ाने का समर्थन करती हैं वह हैं , प्रारंभिक वाक्य ( कलमा ) के रूप में बढ़ाया गया यह इस सूरत का भाग नहीं l
 इक ओर बात जो बिस्मिल्ला के कुरआन शरीफ में बहार से बढ़ाने का समर्थन करती हैं वह हैं सूरते तौबा  के प्रारम्भ में कालमाए तसीमआ ( बिस्मिल्ला ) का वर्णन
 ना करना I  वहां लिखने से छूट गया हैं I यह ना लिखा जाना पढ्ने वालों  ( कारियों ) में इस विवाद का भी विषय बना हैं की सूरते इंफाल ओर सूरते तौबा जिनके मध्य बिस्मिल्ला  निरस्त हैं दो पृथक सूरते हैं या इक ही सूरत के दो भाग – अनुमान यह होता हैं की बिस्मिल्ला कुरआन का भाग नहीं हैं I लेखको की ओर से पुण्य के रूप ( शुभ वचन ) भूमिका के रूप जोड़ दिया गया हैं और बाद में उसे भी ईश्वरीय सन्देश ( इल्हाम ) का ही भाग ही समझ लिया गया हैं I
यही दशा सूरते फातिहा की हैं यह हैं तो मुसलमानों के पाठ के लिए , परन्तु इसके प्रारम्भ में कुन  ( कह ) इकरअ ( पड़ ) अंकित नहीं हैं I और इसे भी इब्ने मसूद ने अपनी पाण्डुलिपि में निरस्त कर दिया था I
महर्षि दयानंद की शंका इक ऐतिहासिक शंका हैं यदि बिस्मिल्ला और सूरते फातिहा पीछे से जोड़े गए हैं तो शेष पुस्तक की शुद्धता का क्या विश्वास ? यदि बिस्मिल्ला ही अशुद्ध तो इंशा व इम्ला ( अन्य लिखने पढ़ने ) का तो फिर विश्वास ही कैसे किया जाए ?
कुछ उत्तर देने वालों ने इस शंका का इल्जामी ( प्रतिपक्षी ) उत्तर वेद की शैली से दिया हैं की वहां भी मंत्रो के मंत्र और सूक्तों के सूक्त परमात्मा की स्तुति में आये हैं ,और उनके प्रारम्भ में कोई भूमिका रूप में ईश्वरीय सन्देश नहीं आया I
वेद ज्ञान मौखिक नहीं – वेद का ईश्वरीय सन्देश आध्यत्मिक , मानसिक हैं मौखिक नही I ऋषियों के ह्रदय की दशा उस ईश्वरीय ज्ञान के समय प्रार्थी की दशा थी I उन्हें कुल ( कह ) कहने की क्या आवश्यकता थी I वेद में तो सर्वत्र यही शैली बरती गयी हैं I बाद के वेदपाठी वर्णनशैली से भूमिकागत भाव ग्रहण करते हैं | यही नहीं इस शैली के परिपालन में संस्कृत साहित्य में अब तक यह नियम बरता जाता हैं की बोलने वाले व सुननेवाले का नाम लिखते नहीं | पाठक भाषा के अर्थों से अनुमान लगता हैं | कुरआन में भूमिका रूप में ऐसे शब्द स्पष्टतया लिखे गए हैं क्योंकी कुरआन कुरआन का ईश्वरीय सन्देश मौखिक हैं जिबरालपाठ करतै हैं और हज़रात मुहम्मद करते हैं इसमें ” कह ” कहना होता हैं | संभव हैं कोई मौलाना ( इस्लामी विद्वान ) इस बाहा प्रवेश को उदाहरण निश्चिय करके यह कहे की अन्य स्थानों पर इस उदाहरण   की भांति ऐसी ही भूमिका स्वयं कल्पित करनी चाहिए | निवेदन यह हैं की उदहारण पुस्तक के प्रारम्भ में देना चाहिए था ना की आगे चलकर उदाहरण और वह बाद में लिखा जाए यह पुस्तक लेखन के नियमों के विपरीत हैं | महर्षि दयानंद  की दूसरी शंका बिस्मिल्ला
के सामान्य प्रयोग पर हैं | महर्षि ने ऐसे तीन कामों का नाम लिया हैं जो प्रत्येक जाती व प्रत्येकमत में निंदनीय हैं | कुरआन में मांसादि का विधान हैं और बलि का आदेश हैं |  इस पर हम अपनी सम्मति
ना देकर शेख खुदा बक्श M . A . प्रोफ़ेसर कलकत्ता विश्वविद्यालय के इक लेख से जो उन्होंने इद्ज्जुहा के अवसर पर कलकत्ता स्थानीय समाचार पत्रों में प्रकाशित करायी थी | निनलिखित हैं उदाहरण प्रस्तुत किये हैं देते हैं –
खुदा बक्श जी का मत – ” सचमुच – सचमुच बड़ा खुदा व दयालु व दया करने वाला हैं वह खुदा आज खून की नदियों का चीखते हुए जानवरों की असहा व अवर्णनीय पीड़ा का इच्छुक नहीं प्रायश्चित ….? वास्तविक प्रायश्चित वह हैं जो मनुष्य के अपने ह्रदय में होता हैं | सभी प्राणियों की और अपनी भावना परवर्तित कर दी जाए | भविष्य के काल का धर्म प्रायश्चित के इस कठोर व निर्दयी प्रकार को त्याग देगा | ताकि वह इन तीनों पर भी भी दयापूर्ण घृणा से दृष्टिपात करें | जब बलि का अर्थ अपने मन के अतिरिक्त किसी अन्य वस्तु अन्य सत्ता  का बलिदान हैं  ”  माडर्न रिव्यु  से अनुवादित ,
दयालु व दया करने वाले परमात्मा का नाम लेने का स्वाभाविक परिणाम यह होना चाहिए था की हम वाणी हैं जीवों पर दया का व्यवहार करते परन्तु किया हमने इसके सर्वथा विरोधी कार्य…..  |
मुजिहूल कुरआन में लिखा हैं –
जब किसी जानवर का वध करें उस पर बिस्मिल्ला व अल्लाहो अकबर पढ़ लिया करें कुरआन में जहाँ कहीं हलाल ( वैध )  व हराम ( अवैध ) का वर्णन आया हैं वहां हलाल ( वैध )  उस वध को निश्चित किया हैं जिस पर अल्लाह का नाम पढ़ा गया हो  |कलमा पवित्र हैं दयापूर्ण हैं परन्तु उसका प्रयोग उसके आशय के सर्वथा विपरीत हैं |
( २ ) इस्लाम में बहु विवाह की आज्ञा तो हैं ही पत्नियों के अतिरिक्त रखैलों की भी परम्परा हैं लिखा हैं – वल्लज़ीन लिफारुजिहिम हफीजुन इल्ला अललजुहुम औ मामलकात ईमानु हुम | सूरतुल
मोमिनन आयत ऐन और जो  रक्षा करते हैं अपने गुप्त अंगों की , परन्तु नहीं अपनी पत्नियों व रखैलों से | तफ़सीरे जलालेन सूरते बकर आयत २२३ निसाउक्कम हर सुल्ल्कुम फयातु हरसकम
अन्ना शीअतुम तुम्हारी पत्नियां तुम्हारी खेतिया हैं जाओ जिस प्रकार अपनी खेती की और जिस प्रकार चाहो | तफ़सीरे जलालेन  में इसकी व्याख्या करते हुए लिखा हैं – जिस बिस्मिल्ला कहकर – सम्भोग करो जिस प्रकार चाहो उठकर बैठकर लेटकर उलटे सीधे जिस प्रकार चाहो सम्भोग के समय बिस्मिल्ला कहलिया करो |                                                                                          बिस्मिल्ला का सम्बन्ध बहु विवाह से हो रखैलों की वैधता से हो | इस प्रकार के सम्भोग से यह स्वामी दयानंद को बुरा लगता हैं
( ३ ) सूरते आल इमरान आयत २७ ल यक्तखिजुमोमिंउनकफ़ीरिणा ओलियाया मिन्दुनिल मोमिना इल्ला अं तख़्तकु मीनहुम तुकतुन
ना बनायें मुसलमान काफिरों को अपना मित्र केवल मुसलमानोंको ही अपना मित्र बनाये |
 इसकी व्याख्या किसी भय के कारण सहूलियत के रूप में ( काफिरों के साथ ) वाणी से मित्रता का वचन कर लिया जाए और ह्रदय में उनसे ईर्ष्या
व वैरभाव रहे तो इसमें कोई हानि नहीं ….. जिस स्थान पर इस्लाम पूरा शक्तिशाली नहीं बना हैं वह अब भी यही आदेश प्रचिलत हैं | स्वामी दयानंद इस मिथ्यावाद की आज्ञा भी ईश्वरीय पुस्तक में नहीं दे सकते ऐसे आदेश या कामों का प्रारम्भ दयालु व दायकर्ता पवित्र और सच्चे परमात्मा के नाम से हो यह स्वामी दयानंद को स्वीकार नहीं |

 

CAN QURAN BE A WORD OF GOD? (PART -2): By Nishant Shaliwan

11

 

The objective is to find that whether Quran is a word of God and is Quran clear in its message or there are self contradictions and, Can the word of God be self contradictory? To know the answer read the second part of the article and decide yourself.

 
CAN QURAN BE A WORD OF GOD? (PART -2)
PART_2
 
By
Nishant Shaliwan

 

 

The objective is to find that whether Quran is a word of God and is Quran clear in its message or there are self contradictions and, Can the word of God be self contradictory? To know the answer read the second part of the article and decide yourself.

In Continuation to the first part of the Article the second part also focus on the contradictions within Quran for those who have not read the first part of the article are requested to first read the first part by following the below given link –http://thelogicalbeliever.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/can-quran-be-a-word-of-god/

OR

http://www.aryamantavya.in/2014/uncategorized/can-quran-word-god/comment-page-1/?subscribe=success#blog_subscription-2

The English translation of Quranic verses has been taken from reliable and authentic Islamic sources like www.quran.com and anybody who feels that the English translation of Quran is not correct  should actually question these Islamic sources from where the translation has been taken. Now as we have studied in the first part of the article that Quran claims itself to be the word of God and it says  in Chapter 4 – Surat An-Nisā’ (The Women) verse 82 which says –

Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah , they would have found within it much contradiction.

So here in this verse there is a very strong claim given by the Author of Quran that if it had been from anybody other than God (Allah) then we would have found many contradictory statements in Quran and no Muslim can refuse this statement in fact they very proudly mention this verse of Quran and challenge Non Muslims to prove one single contradiction in Quran. So if we find a single contradiction in Quran then it cannot be called as a word of God as per the claim of Quran only.

Now also In the first part of the article we have found that Quran claims itself to be a book explained in detail as per Surah 6 verse 114Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book explained in detail?” And those to whom we [previously] gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters”.

and this is not the only verse in Quran also in Surah 41 verse 3 it says that – A Book whose verses have been  detailed, an Arabic Qur’an for a people who know,

Apart from this it is not right for muslims to follow any other scripture as it is also stated in the Quran in Chapter 68 (Surah Al Qalam) verse 37 

Or do you have a scripture (other than Quran) in which you learn?

However, within the same article we have found that in the same book there was no mention of some of the major practices of Islam such as five times of Namaz, Eid after Ramzaan, circumcision and burial of dead bodies.

Now in the second part of the article we will analyze few other things of which the details are missing in the Quran.  It is mentioned in the Quran in Surah 17 verse 1 it says “Glory be to Him Who made His servant to go on a night from the Sacred Mosque to the remote mosque of which We have blessed the precincts, so that We may show to him some of Our signs; surely He is the Hearing, the Seeing”.

Now here are a few questions related to this verse first, who is this servant of which Allah is talking about in this verse? The Muslims might say it is Muhammad, in that case where is it mentioned that the servant is Muhammad? Show us the verse from the Quran itself where it says that the servant was Muhammad whom Allah sent for a night journey to the remote mosque?

Secondly which is this remote mosque mentioned in the verse? Where is it located? And how far is it? Give the details from the Quran itself as the Quran claims itself to be a book which has been explained in detail, If Quran is really explained in detail then why are the details of this night journey not present in the Quran? Is this not a contradiction to the verse 114 of Surah 6 and verse 3 of Surah 41?

Now lets move on the another verse of Quran in Surah 10 verse 47 it says To every people (was sent) a messenger: when their messenger comes (before them), the matter will be judged between them with justice, and they will not be wronged.

In this verse and also in Surah 16 verse 36 a similar claim has been made that a prophet was sent to every nation or community, The question is how many messengers or prophets were sent in how many nations ? What were there names of those prophets? Provide this detail from within the Quran as Quran itself states that it is a book explained in detail.

Sometimes a muslim might mention Surah 40 verse 78 in reply which states “And certainly We sent messengers before you: there are some of them that We have mentioned to you and there are others whom We have not mentioned to you”,

The muslim might say that Allah has not mentioned the detail to us, He has provided us with stories which were important for us to know, but if that is the case then Quran here itself has contradicted the claim mentioned in S-6 : V-114 and S-41 : V-3 where it claims to be be a book explained in detail because as per verse 78 of chapter 40 the complete detail of all prophets has not been given in the Quran itself then how can it be a book explained in detail?

Verse 78 of surah 40 is contradictory to verse 114 of surah 6 and verse 3 of surah 41, Now can we claim Quran to be a word of God? Because the Quran itself says in Chapter 4 – verse 82  Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? If it had been from [any] other than Allahthey would have found within it much contradiction. 

However  there is one more interesting point where I would like to draw your attention, Muslims very often state that the prophet mentioned that there 124000 prophets sent upon the face of earth and the quote  long hadith in Musnad Imam Ahmad, narrated by Abu Umamah al-Bahili relating a conversation that Abu Dharr had with the Prophet. This is some text from toward the end of that hadith: this says  I said “O Messenger of Allah, how many Prophets were there?” He replied “One hundred twenty four thousand, from which three hundred fifteen were jamma ghafeera.”

Now the point is that if Allah has not revealed in Quran the complete detail of prophets then who told Muhammad that 124000 Prophets were sent by Allah? Or the muslims will just use the common escape approach by saying this hadith is not authentic it has become a common trend among muslims, which so ever hadith becomes difficult for them to explain or answer they simply say its unauthentic.

I hope the escape approach would not be adopted this time and we might actually find a muslim who can answer the questions raised in this article.

The Purpose of writing this article is not to hurt anybodies religious beliefs but to accept what is truth and reject what is False.

ॐ असतो मा सद्गमय । Aum Asto Ma Sad Gamya

( O supreme Lord, Lead me from unreal to real )

तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय । Tamso Ma Jyotir Gamya

( Lead me From darkness of ignorance to the light of knowledge )

मृत्योर्मा अमृतं गमय । Mrityur Ma Amritam Gamya

(Lead me from fear of death to the knowledge of Immortality)

ॐ शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः ॥  Aum Shanti Shanti Shanti

(O lord, Let there be Peace, peace and peace )

In case of any query, suggestion or feedback feel free to write me at my email id – defenderoftruth1@gmail.com

 

 

Religion of Peace that orders to kill Non Muslims

In 2001 president Bush quoted at Islamic Center of Washington, D.C. that “Islam is Peace”.  General people who doesn’t have that much knowledge of Islam feels in similar manner. Various Muslim scholars also quote the same and say that Islam literally means “peace or submission” .Muslims who are keen to emphasize their rejection of violence have used the term “a religion of peace” as a description of Islam they says that “The Prophet  did not found a terrorist religion, but a religion of peace.” .but when we look at the history and the current affairs of various Muslim organizations like ISIS, BOKO Haram and Indian Muzahiddin etc, situation is totally different. On looking the activities of these organization and the similar emperors and organization in past it seems that it’s a different world which is shown to general public.

There is an uncanny irony here that many have noticed. The position of these Muslim organizations like ISIS in the face of all provocations seems to be: “Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say that it isn’t, we will kill you. “

Of course, the truth is often more nuanced, but this is about as nuanced as it ever gets: Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say that it isn’t, we peaceful Muslims cannot be held responsible for what our less peaceful brothers and sisters do. When they burn your embassies or kidnap and slaughter your journalists, know that we will hold you primarily responsible and will spend the bulk of our energies criticizing you for “racism” and “Islamophobia.”

The problem, however, is that the credo of these Muslim organizations like Taliban ISIS actually happens to be “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

It is strange that ISIS wants to establish Islamic state. They says that they are on path of Allah. Looking into their views. Its stranger that Allah, the Islamic God, wants to make people Muslims through a cruel scheme of terror. Being the Creator, he could have achieved this goal by creating everybody a Muslim.

It is amazing to maintain appearance, Islam does not include Jihad in its Five Basic Canons, that is the confession (Kalma), Namaz, Roza, Zukat and Hajj. The reason for this exclusion is to create ambiguity to baffle the followers so that freedom is given to carry out acts of barbarity as holy deeds without inquiring into the nature of religion

Jihad is the surest way of securing paradise. Look at the following Qur’anic Evidence to lure Muslims for Jihad.

 

Look at the hatred verses in Quran against the non-Muslims:

is3is3is3is3Sura Repentance 9:5

 “But when the sacred months expire slay those who associate others with Allah in His Divinity wherever you find them, and besiege them and lie in wait for them. But if they repent and establish the prayer and pay Zakah leave them alone. Surely Allah is all – forgiving ever merciful. And if any of those who associate others with Allah in His Divinity seeks asylum, grant him asylum that he may hear the Word of Allah and then escort him to safety for they are a people who do not know.”

AllamaShabbir Ahmad Usmani describes that it is told that though no covenant stood between the Muslims and the covenant breakers and the Muslims were justified to take any prompt actions against them befitting their crime, yet the reverence of the Holy Months demanded some toleration either because first action might have been forbidden in the holy months up to that time or because of some expedient reason that why confusion should be created among the people for a minor things since warring during these months was conventionally infamous among them. However they were given respite till the end of these month to manage their affairs as they liked.

He further explains that After that for the purification of Arabian Peninsula (an area of land that is almost surrounded by water but is joined to a larger piece of land:
the Iberian peninsula (= Spain and Portugal)) there would be no way out save war. And what is done in war – Killing, arresting, besieging, confining, lying in wait for ambush shall be done necessarily.

Look at the further explanations how clear they are in way of forcing the people to convert to Islam. :

 

According to Imam Ahmad, Imam Shafaee, Imam Malik repent it is obligation of an Islamic State to slay the offender of Salat if he does not repent and begin to pray. Imam Abu Haneefa(Be God’s mercy on him) says that he should be beaten harshly and sentenced to confinement till he dies or repents.

 

How poor that GOD is who is dependent on these terrorists to spread his views.

If he would have been that much of powerful why he didn’t created all the people as Muslims.

Why he is so helpless aginst the Shiatan who is creating obstacle in making the whole world an Islamic State.

Why Allah is Evil, Sadistic God?

While I was browsing Islamic Articles online, I came through a most horrifying, sadistic, cruel article on Non-Muslims. I didn’t expect an alleged god (Allah) to be that cruel and sadistic, as his revealed book and words of his holy Prophet suggests. Below I’ll quote the article, with my comments as explanation. The article is taken from ARAB News:


AS Hell has various levels, in some of which the torment and horror is greater than in others, so the people of Hell will be given different levels of punishment. According to a Hadith narrated by Muslim and Ahmad from Samurah, the Prophet (peace be upon him) said concerning the people of Hell: “There are some whom the Fire will take up to their ankles, others up to their knees, others up to their waists, and others up to their collarbones.”

According to another report, “up to their necks” (Muslim in Kitab Al-Jannah wa Sifaat Na’imiha, Baab Shiddat Harr an-Naar, 4/2185) [ARTICLE]


Are we sure, that these words are from Holy Prophet of most merciful god? It doesn’t seems so, because all it talks about burning Non-Muslims, and tormenting them, just because they didn’t believe in an imaginary god, when they were alive? I would also like to draw the attention of readers, that it is not our deeds, which determine whether we Non-Muslim (Kafirs) will be in hell or heaven. Its Allah’s prerogative to send anyone to hell or heaven. In this connection, Prophet Muhammad himself said, in Sahih Bukhari,  Volume 6, Book 60, Number 473 :

“There is none among you, and no created soul but has his place written for him either in Paradise or in the Hell-Fire, and also has his happy or miserable fate (in the Hereafter) written for him.”

If we need to believe on this Hadith, then for sure, Allah is the most merciless & brutal god, who first predetermine the fate and then punishes the Non-Muslims. This is just beginning, let’s see what more Non-Muslims will face in hell of Islam.


The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) has told us about those who will receive the lightest punishment in Hell. Al-Bukhari reports from Al-Nu’maan ibn Bashir who said: “I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) say, ‘The person who will have the least punishment among the people of Hell on the Day of Resurrection will be a man under the arch of whose feet will be placed a smoldering ember, and his brains will boil because of it’. [ARTICLE]


I am amazed to read that the least punishment in Allah’s sadistic torment house will be a man with burning feet & boiling brain. When we are talking of fire, I’ll not forget that the fire in Islamic hell is not the same which we usually see & feel. Because the merciful prophet said, “The Hell Fire is 69 times hotter than ordinary worldly fires.’ So someone said, ‘Allah’s Apostle, wouldn’t this ordinary fire have been sufficient to torture the unbelievers?” [Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 487]. Now we are getting little idea of Islamic hell, which is prepared by merciless, barbaric Allah to torture those who chose not to believe in his pseudo-scientific, illogical, violent rant. Below is the list of some extremely violent, inhumane, barbaric list of punishment, with reference from authentic scriptures of Islam, which will be given to Non-Believers of Islam.


Roasting of the skin
The Fire of the Almighty will burn the skin of the infidels. The skin is the site of sensation, where the pain of burning is felt, and for this reason, Allah Almighty will replace the burned skin with a new one, to be burned anew, and this will be repeated endlessly: “Those who reject Our Signs, We shall soon cast them into the Fire. As often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty. For Allah is Exalted in Power, All-Wise.” (Qur’an, 4:56)

Melting
One of the kinds of torment will be the pouring of Al-Hamim over their heads. Al-Hamim is ultra-heated water; because of its extreme heat, it will melt their innards and everything inside: “… then as for those who disbelieve, garments of fire will be cut out for them, boiling water will be poured down over their heads. With it will melt or vanish away what is within their bellies, as well as skins.” (Qur’an, 22:19-20)

At-Tirmidhi reported from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Al-Hamim will be poured on their heads and will dissolve through until it reaches their sides and all their innards will drop out, until it comes out of his feet, and everything is melted, then he will be restored as he was.” He (At-Tirmidhi) said, “It is a sahih ghareeb hasan Hadith.” (At-Takhweef min An-Naar, p.145, Jaami’ Al-Usool, 10/540)

Scorching (the face)
The noblest and most dignified part of a person is the face, hence the Prophet (peace be upon him) forbade us to strike the face. One of the ways in which Allah Almighty will humiliate the people of Hell is by gathering them on their faces, blind, deaf and dumb, on the Day of Resurrection: “…We shall gather them together prone on their faces, blind, dumb, and deaf; their abode will be Hell; every time it shows abatement, We shall increase for them the Fierceness of the Fire.” (Qur’an, 17:97)

Then they will be thrown on their faces in the Fire: “And if any do evil, their faces will be thrown headlong into the Fire: “Do you receive a reward other than that which you have earned by your deeds?” (Qur’an, 27:90)

The Fire will burn and cover their faces forever, with no barrier between them and it: “If only the unbelievers knew when they will not be able to ward off the Fire from their faces, nor yet from their backs, and no help can reach them!” (Qur’an, 21:39)

“The Fire will burn their faces and they will therein grin, with their lips displaced.” (Qur’an, 23:104)

“Their garments of liquid pitch, and their faces covered with fire.” (Qur’an, 14:50)

“Is then one who has to fear the brunt of the penalty on the Day of Judgement his face?” (Qur’an, 39:24)

Look at this horrific scene that makes one shudder!
“The Day that their faces will be turned upside down in the Fire, they will say, “Woe to us! Would that we had obeyed Allah and obeyed the Messenger.” (Qur’an, 33:66)
Do you not see that just as meat and fish are turned over when they are cooked, so their faces will be turned over in the Fire of Hell. We seek refuge with Allah Almighty from the punishment of the people of Hell.

Dragging
Another of the painful torments that the infidels will suffer is being dragged on their faces into Hell: “Truly those in sin are the ones straying in mind, and mad. The Day they will be dragged through the Fire on their faces: “Taste the touch of Hell.” (Qur’an, 54:47-48)

Their pain at being dragged will be increased by the fact that they will be tied up in chains and fetters: “…But soon shall they know, when the yokes round their necks, and the chains, they shall be dragged along, in the boiling fetid fluid, then shall they be burned.” (Qur’an, 40:70-72)
Qatadah said, “They will be dragged once in the Fire, and once in Al-Hamim.” (Ibn Rajab, at-Takhweef min an-Naar, p.147)

Blackening of the faces
Allah Almighty will blacken the faces of the people of Hell in the Hereafter: “On the Day when some faces will be white and some faces will be black; to those who faces will be black: “Did you reject Faith after accepting it? Taste then the Penalty for rejecting Faith.” (Qur’an, 3:106)

This is intense blackness, as if the darkness of night had covered their faces
“But those who have earned evil will have a reward of like evil, and ignominy will cover their faces. No defender will they have from Allah. Their faces will be covered, as it were, with pieces from the darkness of night. They are Companions of the Fire, they will abide therein [for aye!] (Qur’an, 10:27) [ARTICLE]


After reading these verses from Quran, and sayings of Muhammad, I don’t believe any sane, rational mind, will call Islam a religion of peace, or Allah the Most Merciful Lord of universe as Muslims say. These verses are evil & demonic, and it appears that these verses are written by the most demonic & sadistic man ever to live on face of Earth. I want to leave readers with choice, either they want to live a life-like hell with so-called peaceful Muslims like Osama Bin Laden & Hafiz Syed, or they want to eradicate this cancer called Islam.

CAN QURAN BE A WORD OF GOD?

quran word of god

Author – Aryavir

The Scholars of Islam claim Quran to be a word of GOD (Allah) and they bring forward some verses from Quran to support their claims. In this Short article, we will analyze one such claim and will prove that Quran is not a word of God in just three simple steps. The English translation of Quranic verses has been taken from reliable and authentic Islamic sources like www.quran.com and anybody who feels that the English translation of Quran is not correct  should actually question these Islamic sources from where the translation has been taken.

 

STEP NO 1:

 

It is written in Quran Chapter 4 – Surat An-Nisā’ (The Women) verse 82 which says –

 

Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah , they would have found within it much contradiction.

 

So here in this verse there is a very strong claim given by the Author of Quran that if it had been from anybody other than God (Allah) then we would have found  many contradictory statements in Quran and no Muslim can refuse this statement in fact they very proudly mention this verse of Quran and challenge Non Muslims to prove one single contradiction in Quran. So if we find a single contradiction in Quran then it cannot be called as a word of God.

 

STEP NO 2:

 

Now let us have at look on some other verse of Quran-

 

Chapter 6(Surah Al-anam) verse 114 says-

 

[Say], “Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book explained in detail?” And those to whom We [previously] gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters.

 

Chapter 68 (Surah Al Qalam) verse 37 –

 

Or do you have a scripture (other than Quran) in which you learn

 

Chapter 77 ( Surah Al-Mursalat ) verse 50 –

 

Then in what statement after the Qur’an will they believe?

 

 

So as per these verse Quran is a book which has explained things in detail so neither you should doubt the authenticity of Quran and nor you should follow any other book other than Quran because according to these verses Quran is a complete book and the best discourse and no Muslim can disagree with this statement.

 

STEP NO 3 –

 

Now in the first two steps we have studied that Quran claims itself to be a book from God and states that there are no contradictions and it is book which is itself complete and has been explained in detail now we will analyze a four well known practices of Islam and we will see whether they are explained in detail or not and whether they contradict the verse 114 of chapter 6.  Here are the four well known practices in the light of Quran-

 

a). FIVE TIME NAMAZ (PRAYER ) –

 

Salat (prayer) is one of the most important pillars of Islam and it is compulsory for a muslim to pray five times ( Namely Namaz fajr, Namaz zuhr, Namaz Asr, Namaz Maghrib, Namaz Isha ) in a day but surprisingly in Quran the holy book of Muslims which is book which has explained things in detail (As per Q 6:114 )  does not even mentions the number of times need to pray in a day there is not even a single verse in Quran which says that a muslim is suppose to pray 5 times a day and even more surprisingly even the names of five prayers are not mentioned in Quran, By name only Three Namaz are mentioned in Quran

 

1-      Salat Al-Fajr (Dawn Prayer)24:58

2-       Salat Al-Isha (Night Prayer)24:58

3-       Al-Salat Al-Wusta (The Middle Prayer) 2:238.

 

Chapter 2 verse238  mentions the middle prayer and also says to perform the obligatory prayers but does not mentions how many times in a day you need to perform the obligatory prayers.

So The five times of Namaz is not mentioned in Quran a book which is claimed to be explained in detail and claims no contradictions in it and does not even clearly mentions the minimum number of times one needs to perform Prayer in a day which is indeed one amongst the basic pillars of Islam. It seems like the Author of Quran got so busy in expressing his hate and intolerance for Non Muslims that he forgot to mention the minimum number of times a muslim needs to pray in a day and then the Fake story of flying donkey (Al-Burq) was created to justify the concept of Five time Namaz in a day.

 

b). Celebrating Eid on the end of Ramadan 

 

Unknown to many Muslims, the term ‘Eid’ has never been used by the Quran to mark the end of Ramadan or to celebrate the conclusion of the fasting period. For example, the requirements to fast in the month of Ramadan, to pay ‘zakat’ and to establish ‘salah’ are not learnt by ‘prophetic sunna’ or tradition. These are clear directives instituted by the Quran as are many other prescriptive laws and edicts. There is absolutely no ‘religious’ prescription to celebrate ‘Eid’ in the Quran

 

The term ‘Eid’ has only been used once in the entire Quran and possibly in the context of the Eucharist which is the Christian ceremony which commemorates the Biblical Last Supper of Prophet Jesus. According to the New Testament, the festival is celebrated by Prophet Jesus’s followers as per his instructions to remember him.

 

According to the Quran, Prophet Jesus in response to an initial request made by his disciples (5:112), prayed to Almighty God that He send from heaven a table spread (with food) as a festival (Eid). This festival would constitute a sign from God from the ‘first to the last of them’

 

In Chapter 5 verse 114 “Said Jesus the son of Mary: “O God our Lord! Send us from heaven a table spread, that there may be for us  a festival (Arabic: Eid(an)) for the first and the last of us and a sign from You; and provide for our sustenance, for You are the best Sustainer (of our needs).””

 

But  no where in Quran (a book which is claimed to be explained in detail and claims no contradictions in it) ‘Eid’ has been used to mark the end of Ramadan or to celebrate the conclusion of the fasting period.

 

 

c). PROCEDURE FOR BURIAL OF DEAD BODIES 

 

Now Burial of dead bodies is a very important concept in Islam Muslims believe that a person whose body has not been buried cannot enter heaven and Burial of the Dead in Islam as it is practiced today, deploys a rigid ritualized process which is performed in the name of ‘religion’. Depending on which school of thought one follows, the rituals can vary.

 

What is interesting to note is the fact that preparing the body in a specified manner for burial is not mentioned anywhere in the Quran . For example, the Quran states when  ‘ghusl’ (bathing) or ‘wudu’ (ablution) is required in chapter 5: verse 6 but this verse mentions no ghusl and wudu for the Dead.

 

There is complete silence on the matter regarding burial preparation and it is a matter left to society to prepare and bury the body in what is deems appropriate. There is no codified Quranic position with regards this. There is no right or wrong way to bury the dead, other than with respect and a matter to be performed with dignity.

 

d).  Circumcision 

 

Many Muslims never question whether this ritual has any basis in scripture (i.e. the Quran).  Instead, they blindly follow the traditions of their forefathers without rational thought, evidence or analysis subjecting their new born children to a part mutilation of their genitalia. The Quran on the other hand makes no mention of circumcision.

 

Instead, there are verses that indicate that God has already created the human shape in a perfected form (requiring no changes such as the removal of a male’s foreskin )

 

Chapter 95. verse 4

 

Transliteration

 

Laqad khalaqna al-insana fee ahsanitaqweem

 

“We have indeed created mankind in the best of stature (moulds ) (Arabic: taqweem)

 

The above verses beg the following question. Why then is the male incomplete and requires his foreskin to be removed if our Lord has revealed no decree for it nor hinted at it from His words which He has revealed to us?

 

In fact, the only source that  can be cited by Muslim is the ‘Sunna’, a practice carried forward from Abraham. But the question still remains. Where is the proof that this indeed was a practice instituted for humanity (men) when clearly God instructed Prophet Muhammad  to follow the commandments and warn by way of the Quran only (6:19; 50:45)?

 

At no place in the Quran does it mention that Abraham practiced circumcision and if they bring proofs from any other book than it proves that Quran cannot be called a book which is explained in detail.

 

In connection with the above, the desperation to prove this practice as a religious requirement of Islam is all too evident in Muslim thought when the Bible (which is claimed by Muslims to be a corrupted book) is used to invoke proof. It is clear that many Christians themselves do not see circumcision as a fundamental requirement of their faith and worship towards God and they posit their arguments from scripture. Jewish followers do much the same to support their particular stance for the commandment of circumcision.

 

The Quran on the other hand makes no mention of circumcision.

 

CONCLUSION –

 

Quran which as per chapter 4 verse 82 claims to be a book from Allah because by claiming itself to be free from contradictions and in another verse Quran says that it is book explained in detail (as per verse 114 of chapter 6) and Muslims require no other book then Quran (as per verse 37 of chapter 68 and verse 50 of chapter 77) as Quran in itself is a complete book for Muslims.

 

Now in step three we have analyzed that the basic and most well known practices of Islam like

 

1 Five times Namaz daily

2Celebrating Eid on the end of Ramadan

3 Procedure for Burial of dead bodies

4 Circumcision of male gentiles

 

Is not even mentioned in Quran then how can we claim this book to be a book explained in detail ? Is this not a contradiction to verse 114 of chapter 6 ? Is this not a contradiction?

 

Muslims themselves knew that Quran is an incomplete book and to justify there practices they compiled the books of Hadees, We today see that Hadees themselves are books full of contradictions Sunni Muslim reject Shia Hadees and Shia Muslim reject Sunni Hadees and the Aihl-e-Quran (Quran Aloners) reject all the Hadees. In any of the above case whether we include Hadees or not Quran itself remains an incomplete book and no justification and mention for many of the current day practices of Islam are found in Quran.

 

So the above three step analysis clearly proves that Quran is not a word of God infact it is a man made book filled with errors and contradictions.

 

[Note – To keep the length of this article short, I have briefly discussed only four well known practices of Islam which are not mentioned in Quran there are some other things also which are not mentioned in Quran and some more contradictions in Quran which will be discussed in the next part of this series CAN QURAN BE A WORD OF GOD?]

 

The Purpose of writing this article is not o hurt anybodies religious beliefs but to accept what is truth and reject what is False.

 

ॐ असतो मा सद्गमय । Aum Asto Ma Sad Gamya

( O supreme Lord, Lead me from unreal to real )

तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय । Tamso Ma Jyotir Gamya

( Lead me From darkness of ignorance to the light of knowledge )

मृत्योर्मा अमृतं गमय । Mrityur Ma Amritam Gamya

(Lead me from fear of death to the knowledge of Immortality)

ॐ शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः ॥  Aum Shanti Shanti Shanti

(O lord, Let there be Peace, peace and peace )

 

In case of any query, suggestion or feedback feel free to write me at my email id – defenderoftruth1@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrorism has a Religion, and that is Islam

Politically correct leaders, paid media, and pseudo-secular activists want us to believe that terrorism has no religion. They stress that no religion teaches terrorism, and it should not be linked with any faith. Grand Mufti of Egypt, Ali-Gomaa once wrote in his article:jihad-1024x522

“Terrorism cannot be born of religion. Terrorism is the product of corrupt minds, hardened hearts, and arrogant egos, and corruption, destruction, and arrogance are unknown to the heart attached to the divine.  Islam is a religion of tolerance and peaceful coexistence with all of humanity both as individuals and communities. Islam views people as honored creatures without regard for their religion, race, or color. “ 

If you ask any Islamic cleric or the politically correct leader about linking Islam with terrorism, their most probable answer would be, that terror has no religion or color. India’s External Affairs Minister, Mr. Salman Khurshid when asked the same question few months back, he answered:

“Terror does not have religion. We have said this very clearly. And religion should not be associated with color.  This we have said very clearly. It is terror that we have to fight. Terror directed against India that we are fighting.”

Ask this question to any of the above mentioned people, the answer would be absolute same. But the question is, are they factually correct? Does Terrorism really has no connection with any particular religion? Has terrorism no color? In this article I will try to answer these questions using evidences, and teachings from canonical scripture of Islam and by the facts provided by the terrorists (Jihadis) themselves.

There are loads of evidences which proves Islam is the religion of Terrorism, but it cannot be compiled in a single article. So I’ll try to provide some evidences which proves my point.  The Islamic clerics themselves admit that it is OK to kill the Non-Muslims (Kafirs) as per the teaching of Islam. In 2002 [WND], A London-based Muslim cleric has been caught on film urging his followers to kill non-Muslims – particularly Americans – and to commit other acts of terrorism.

Sheik Abu Hamza, affiliated with London’s Finsbury Park mosque, tells an audience that non-believers should be killed or sold into slavery in a tape converted to digital files and smuggled onto the Internet.

The tapes were reportedly given by Hamza to a researcher who posed as a supporter and infiltrated his inner circle. “If a kafir person (non-believer) goes in a Muslim country, he is like a cow,” explains Hamza. “Anybody can take him. That is the Islamic law.”

Another example is of Ajmal Kasab, the sole surviving gunman from 2008 Mumbai attacks admitted that hisAKAS (Islamic Leaders or Preachers) told him that killing ‘Hindu kafirs’ and getting killed while doing so is the most pious way to get to heaven, where a thousand million virgins will be waiting to serve them and take them even higher.

If these two example are not sufficient enough to prove that Islam is the religion of Terrorism, so let’s see what happened in West Gate Mall in Kenya.

According to an Eyewitness News who spoke to the Economist magazine’s Daniel Howden who is in Nairobi.

He said after the initial burst of firing was over, several witnesses said the attackers were calling on Muslims who were inside the mall to identify themselves so they could be allowed to leave.

The above report proves that the terrorists identified Muslims as their own, so they allowed them to leave the mall to kill all the other Non-Muslim inside the mall. As per another report:

“In one instance, it was described to me that an Indian man pretended he was a Muslim and was asked to provide the name of the mother of the Prophet Muhammad. When he couldn’t provide it, he was shot dead in front of everyone.”

It again proves that the terrorists wanted to know the religion of people who tried to escape, and they asked them questions, which are mostly known to Muslims. The Indian man was killed because, he didn’t knew the name of mother of Muhammad, whom terrorists adore as their Prophet, and his religion as their religion.

The evidence against Islam, becomes much stronger by the recent suicide bombing by Muslims in a Church in Pakistan, which was only attended by Christians. The sole intention of suicide bomber was to kill as many Non-Muslim he can.

These terrorist attacks are not alone evidence, there are dozens of verses too, which exhorts Muslims to become terrorists. Although I have discussed it many a times, still I’ll quote few verses which clearly commands Muslims to kill and fight those who accept not Allah as their Lord and Muhammad as his Prophet.

Quran 8:39 says, “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.”

The verse is self-explanatory, the author wants Muslims to fight the Non-Muslims until the religion is solely for Allah, i.e. Islam alone. Many Islamic scholars complain us of quoting the verses out of context, but unfortunately the verse itself says to fight the all the disbeliever until religion is only for Allah, which leaves no room for contextual interpretation.

Quran 9:14 says, “Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.”

It is amazing to read that it is Allah himself who is using the hands of these terrorists to punish innocent non-believers, still people say that religion should not be linked with terrorism.

Now I believe after going through these evidences, any rational mind, without a shadow of doubt will agree with me, that Islam is the religion of terrorism. Terrorists are born out of preaching of Quran, and yes terrorist have a religion a color, which is Islam.