Category Archives: Islam

English, Islam

Why I am not a Believer of Islam

Leave a comment

I’ll start this article by quoting an Islamic site, which says that Islam is the only true religion,and mankind need to follow Islam for salvation. It further goes to claim that all child are born sinless and a Muslim. Later their environment leads to unbelief and adopt practices which contradicts Islam.

It further says “Islam is known not only as a rational and moral way of life prescribed for all of mankind, it is known by the term ‘Din ul-Fitra’ or ‘the natural religion’. Islam is the religion designed by the Creator of mankind for the benefit of mankind and therefore fits human nature perfectly. Being Muslim is living in harmony with your human nature.” [Islamic Org/ Why Islam] 

However, I find this contradictory with authority of Islam, i.e. Qur’an. Qur’an in many verses say, that Allah is the reason of disbelief, also we will try to find why we are Disbelievers, Polytheists, Idolaters, Atheists, Agnostics, etc, who are the prime target of Islamic Jihadist, who kill innocent people in name of Allah.

Allah in Quran says Qur’an 6:111 

Sahih International

And even if We had sent down to them the angels [with the message] and the dead spoke to them [of it] and We gathered together every [created] thing in front of them, they would not believe unless Allah should will. But most of them, [of that], are ignorant.

Allah in this verse says, that even if he makes dead speak to Unbelievers that, Allah is the true GOD, and Muhammad is his messenger and send Angels to testify the message of the Prophet, still no unbeliever is going to believe in Qur’an and Muhammad. Now the question in mind of readers would be why they are not going to believe it? The answer is very plain and simple, it is because it is Allah’s will, that the unbelievers will not believe in him and his Message (Qur’an).[Source]

Ibn Abbas explains this verse as follows:

(And though We should send down the angels) as they have asked and testified in favour of that which they denied (unto them) unto those who sneer, (and the dead should speak unto them) from their graves, as they asked, telling them that Muhammad is Allah’s Messenger and that the Qur’an is Allah’s speech, (and We should gather against them all things) of birds and beasts (in array) face to face, testifying that what We say is the Truth and affirming that which they have denied, (they would not believe) in Muhammad and the Qur’an (unless Allah so willed) that they believe. (Howbeit, most of them are ignorant) that it is the Truth from Allah.

On the very same verse, Ali Dashti in his book 23 years, page 41-42 writes:-

Such being the case, certain questions arise. If these people’s future unbelief and persistence in polytheism had already been preordained, what useful purpose had been served by God’s appointment of a man to preach to them and guide them aright? Can a useless action be attributed to God who is wise, omniscient, and infallible? Formalists, who reject the application of reason to religious questions, interpret the statement as an ultimatum or test intended to make humans aware that they are wicked and deserve punishment in the next life. This interpretation, however, is inconsistent with the immediately following words “unless God so willed” in the same verse 111. The inescapable conclusion is these people were not going to believe because God did not wish them to believe, and this is confirmed by the clear statement “We shall confuse their hearts and eyes” in verse 110. Earlier in the same sura 6 it is stated, in verse 107, that “If God had so willed, they would not have been polytheists.” God must therefore have willed that  they should be polytheists. Surely Almighty God’s humble creatures cannot change His will. Not even Mohammad could dissuade from polytheism those whose polytheism was caused by God’s will. The idolaters in question were not to blame. Why, then, were they threatened with punishment after death?

Indirectly, the all Knowing, Omniscient, Merciful God, says that he has proof and evidence to prove Qur’an being a true revelation from GOD, and Muhammad is his messenger. But he did not want to show those proof, because Unbelievers will not believe in him and his Message, because its not his will. Now guess what sense it makes, and why Qur’an was revealed to a Messenger, when it was already preordained that Non-Believers are not going to believe in it. This is not the only verse, which claims such thing. There are many more such verse. Let’s have a look on them too.

Qur’an 32:13 

Sahih International

And if we had willed, We could have given every soul its guidance, but the word from Me will come into effect [that] “I will surely fill Hell with jinn and people all together.

It is good to hear that Allah has already said that he will fill the Hell with Men and Jinns together, that is why he need not to guide all the souls. In other words, if he will guide all souls, they will all go to Heaven, with rest of Believers. In this case his words will become due, which he has already decided. That is why Allah will guide only a few and leave the rest for hell fires in hereafter. [Source]

It would have been a much better choice of Allah, if he had willed to make all mankind his believers. I leave it on readers to guess why he left us without guidance, which leads to Bloodshed, Terrorist activities, Love Jihad, Suicide Bombing etc. I will also add that this God is very Unjust and Cruel, he wants to sent us to hell, just to keep his words.

Lastly, I would like to draw attention of all the unbelievers to a verse of Qur’an, which declares fate of those who disbelief in Allah.

Qur’an 2:161-162

Sahih International

Indeed, those who disbelieve and die while they are disbelievers – upon them will be the curse of Allah and of the angels and the people, all together,

Sahih International

Abiding eternally therein. The punishment will not be lightened for them, nor will they be reprieved.

So, our fate is decided and we will abide in hell hereafter eternally. Allah and his Angels will curse us too for our disbelief. Even our good deeds of this life will not benefit us in day of Judgement. Unbelievers’ good deeds won’t be accepted on the Day of Judgement because they lack devotion and consistency which are fundamental in Islamic Canons.  Good deeds are null and void if they are not compatible with the Islamic rulings or if they lack sincerity.  Unbelievers’ deeds lack one or both of the two conditions which consequently puts their deeds much farther from being accepted. [Source] 

Anyways, I on behalf of all Disbelievers thanks Allah for not guiding us, and making us follower of a Terrorist Prophet and his violent and hatred preaching book, Qur’an. I am even thankful to Allah, that he will send us in hell, because it will be much better and peaceful place without believers (Muslims), as they will go in heaven.

English, Islam, इस्लाम

DR AMBEDKAR ON ISLAM

3 Comments

pakistan or partition of india

DR AMBEDKAR IS REGARDED AS MOST POWERFUL VOICE OF DALITS IN INDIA.
HIS WORDS ARE TAKEN AS TAKE IT FOR FOR GRANTED BY EVERY DALIT OF THE COUNTRY.TODAY DALIT LEADERS ARE MORE INTERESTED IN POLITICS AND FILLING THEIR HOMES INSTEAD OF REAL DEVELOPMENT OF DALITS. SO THEY PLAYS CASTE BASED POLITICS AND THE LATEST ADDITION IS OF DALIT-MUSLIM NEXUS.

HOW DALITS COULD FORGET WONDEROUS TREATMENT BY FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM AGAINST HINDUS AND BUDDHISTS IN PAST?

HOW BUDDHIST DALITS COULD FORGET WIPE OUT OF BUDDHISM FROM AFGANISTAN, PAKISTAN, BANGALDESH BY MUSLIMS?

HOW COULD DALITS FORGET THE WORDS OF DR AMBEDKAR ON WONDEROUS TRATEMENT BY FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM AND JOIN THE DALIT BUDDHIST NEXUX?

FOLLOWING ARE THE QUOTES BY DR AMBEDKAR ON ISLAM

All quotations are from pakistan or the partition of india by Dr B.R.Ambedkar, 3rd edition ,1946 BAWS Vol. 8,1990 , govt of Maharashtra publication; previous name of the book: Thoughts on Pakistan
Hindu is a Kafir-Not worthy of respect-

“To the muslims, a Hindu (and any non-muslim) is a Kafir. A Kafir (non-believer in islam) is not worthy of respect. He is a low born and without status. That is why a country ruled by the Kafir (Non-muslim) is a Dar-ul-Harb (i.e. the land of war) to a Muslim, which must be conquered, by any means for the muslims and turned into Dar-ul-Islam (i.e. land of muslims alone). Given this, no further evidence seems necessary to prove that the muslims will not obey a Hindu (or for that matter any non- muslim) government ”
Ref-page 301

Brotherhood of muslims for the muslims only-

“Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between muslims and non-muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of islam is not the universal brotherhood of man.It is the brotherhood of muslims for muslims only. There is fraternity but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.
The second defect of islam is that it is a system of social self-government, because the allegiance of a muslim does not rest on his domicile in the country which is his but on the faith to which he belongs. To the muslim ibi bene patria is unthinkable. Wherever- there is the rule of islam, there is his own country.
In other words, Islam can never allow a true muslim to adopt india as his motherland and regard a hindu as his kith and kin. that is probably the reason why maulana Mahomed Ali, a great indian but a true muslim, preferred to be buried in Jerusalem rather than in India.’
(Ref-page 330-331)

Difficult to see difference between a communal and nationalist muslim:

“It is difficult to see any real difference between the communal muslims who form the Muslim league and the nationalist muslims. It is extremely doubtful whether the nationalist musalmans have any real community of sentiment, aim and policy with the congress which mark them off from the muslim league. Indeed many Congressmen are alleged to hold the view that there is no different between the two and that the nationalist muslim inside the congress are only an outpost of the communal muslims”
ref- page 408

Muslim invaders planted the seeds of Islam in India.

“The Muslim invaders, no doubt, came to India singing a hymn of hate against the hindus, but, they did not merely sing their hymn of hate and go back burning a few temples on the way. That would have been a blessing. they were not content with so negative a result. They did a positive act, namely, to plant the seed of islam. The growth of this plant is remarkable. It is not a summer sapling. It is as great and as stronger as an oak. Its growth is thickest in northern india. The successive invasions have deposited their ‘silt’ served as watering exercises of devoted gardners, its growth is so thick in northern india that the remnants of hindu and buddhist culture are just shurbs. Even the sikh axe could not fell this oak”
Ref page- 65

Muslim’s strategy in politics:

“The third thing that is noticeable is teh adoption by the muslims of the gangster’s method in politics. The riots are a sufficient indication that gangsterism has become a settled part of their strategy in polices”
Ref page- 269

Murderers are religious martyrs

“But whether the number of prominent Hindus killed by fanatic muslims is large or small mattes little. What matters is the attitude of those who count towards these murderes. The murderers paid the penalty of law where law is enforced. The leading moslems, however , never condemned these criminals. On the contrary, they were hailed as religious martyrs and agitation was carried on for clemency being shown to them. As an illustration of this attitude, one may refer to Mr. Barkat Ali , a barrister of Lahore, who argued the appeal of Abdul Qayum. He went to the length of saying that qayum was not guilty of murder of Nathuramal because his act was justifiable by the law of the Koran. This attitude of the moslems is quite understandable. what is not understandable is the attitude of Mr. Gandhi ‘

Ref page 157

Hindus and muslims are two distinct spiritual species from aspritual point of view, Hindus and Musalmans are not merely two classes or two sects such as protestants and Catholics or Shaivas and Vaishnavas. They are two distinct species.

page 193

Islam and Castism

“Everybody infers that islam must be free from slavery and caste. Regarding slavery nothing needs to be said. It stands abolished now by law. But while it existed much of its support was derived from islam and islamic countries.”
But if slavery has gone, caste among musalmans has remained, as an illustration one may take the conditions prevalent among the Bengal Muslims. The superintendent of the census for 1901 for the province of Bengal records the following interesting facts regarding the muslims of bengal:-

The conventional division of the Mahomedans into four tribes- sheikh, saiad, moghul and pathan- has very little application to this province (bengal). the mahomedans themselves recognize two main social divisions, (1) ashraf or sharaf and (2) ajlaf. ashraf means noble and includes all undoubted descendents of foreigners and converts from high castes hindus. all other mahamedans including the occupational groups and all converts of lower ranks ,are known by the contemptuous-terms. ‘ajlab’, ‘wretches’ or ‘mean people’: they are also called kamina or itar, ‘base’ or rasil, a corruption of rizal, “worthless’. in some places a third class, called arzal or lowest of all is added. With them no other mohomedan would associate, and they are forbidden to enter the mosque to use the public burial ground.
“within these groups there are castes with social precedence of exactly the same nature as one finds among the Hindus.”

1. ashraf or better class mahomedans.
(1) saiads (2) sheikhs (3) pathans (4) moghul (5) malik and (6) mirza

2. ajlaf or lower class mahomedans.
(1) cultivating sheikhs, and other who were originally hindus but do not belong to any functional group, and have not gained admittance to the ashraf community e.g. pirali and thakrai
(2) darzi, jolaha, fakir and rangrez
(3) brahi, bhathiara, cluk, chrihar, dai, dhawa, dhunia, gaddi, kalal, kasai, kula, kunjara, laheri, mahifarosh, mallah, naliya, nikari.
(4) abdal, bako, bediya, bhat , chamba, dafali,dhobi, hallam, mucho, nagarchi, nat, panwari, madaria,tuntia.

3. arzal or degraded class.
bhanar, halalkhor, hijra, kasbi, lalbegi, mougtra, mehtar.
similar facts from other provinces of India could be gathered from their respective census reports and those who are curious may refer to them. But the facts for Bengal are enough to show that the mahamoedans observed not only caste but also untouchability
page- 228-230

Muslim canon oppose social reform

The existence of these evils among the muslims is distressing enough. But far more distressing is the fact that there is no organized movement of social reform among the musalmans of india on a scale sufficient to bring about their eradication. The hindus have their social evils. But there is relieving feature about them namely, that some of them are conscious of their existance and a few of them are actively agitating for their removal. Indeed, they oppose any change in their existing practices. it is noteworthy that the muslims opposed the child marriage bill brought in the central assembly in 1930, whereby the age for marriage of a girl was raised to 14 and for a boy to 18 on the ground that it was opposed to the muslim canon law. Not only did they oppose the bill at every stage but that when it became law they started a campaign of civil disobedience against that act

Ref page-233

Muslim politicians oppose secular categories: “muslim politicians do not recognize secular categories of life as the basis of their politics because to them it means the weakening of the community in it fight against the hindus. The poor muslims will not join the poor hindus to get justice from the rich. Muslim tenants will not join hindu tenants to prevent the tyranny of the landlord. Muslim labourers will not join hindu labourers in the fight of labour against the capitalist. Why? the answer is simple. The poor muslims sees that if he joins in the fight of the poor against the rich, he may be fighting against a rich muslim. The muslim laborer feels that if he joins in the onslaught of labor against capitalist he will be injuring a muslim mill-owner. He is conscious that any injury to a rich muslim, to a muslim landlord or to a muslim mill-owner, is a disservice to the muslim community, for it is thereby weakened in outs struggle against the hindu community ”

Ref page -236

India cannot be common motherland of the hindus and muslims as per muslim laws:

According to muslim canon law the world is divided into two camps, dar-ul-islam (abode of islam) and dar-ul-harb (adobe of war). a country is dar-ul-islam when it is ruled by muslims. a country is dar-ul-harb when muslims only reside in it but are not rulers of it. that being the canon law of the muslims, india cannot be the common motherland of the hindus and the musalmans. it can be the land of the musalmans- but it cannot be the land of the ‘hindus and musalmans living as equals’. Further, it can be the land of the musalmans only when it is governed by the muslims. the moment the land become subject to the authority of a non-muslim power, it ceases to be the land of the muslims. instead of being dar-ul-islam it becomes dar-ul-harb.
I must not be supposed that this view is only of academic interest. For it is capable of becoming an active force capable of influencing the conduct of the Muslims.

Ref- page 294

Jihad to transform dar-ul-harb india to dar-ul-islam

It might also be mentioned that hijrat is not the only way of escape to Muslims who find themselves in adar-ul-harb. there is another injunction of Muslim canon law called jihad (crusade) by which it becomes incumbent on a Muslim ruler to extend the rules of Islam until the whole world shall have been brought under its sway. The world, being divided into two camps, dar-ul-islam (adobe of islam) , dar-ul-harb (adobe of war), all countries come under one category or the other. technically , it is the duty of the Muslim ruler, who is capable of doing so, to transform dar-ul-harb into dar-ul-islam.

The fact remains that India, if not exclusively under Muslim rule, is a dar-ul-harb and the musalmans, according to the tenants of Islam are justified in proclaiming a jihad.
The fact remains that India, if not exclusively under Muslim rule, is a dar-ul-harb and the muslamns, according to the tenets of Islam are justified in proclaiming a jihad.
Not only can they proclaim jihad but they can call the aid of a foreign Muslim power to make jihad success, or if the foreign Muslim power intents to proclaim a jihad, help that power in making its Endeavour a success.

Ref-page 295-296

Why is hindu-muslim unity a failure?

“The real explanation of this failure of hindu-muslim unity lies in the failure to realize that what stands between the Hindus and Muslims is not a mere matter of difference , and that this antagonism is not to be attributed to material cause. it is formed by causes which take their origin in historical, religious, cultural and social antipathy, of which political antipathy is only a reflection.”

Ref- page 329

Hindu-Muslim unity is out of sight

nothing i could say can so well show the futility of any hope of hindu-muslim unity. Hindu -Muslim unity up to now was at least in sight although it was like a mirage. Today it is out of sight and also out of mind. Even Mr. Gandhi has given up what, he perhaps now realizes, is an impossible task.

Ref- page 187

Transfer of minorities is the only remedy for communal peace.

“The transfer of minorities is the only lasting remedy for communal peace, is beyond doubt. if that is so, there is no reason why the Hindus and the Muslims should keep on trading in safeguards which have proved so unsafe. if small countries, with limited resources like Greece, turkey and Bulgaria, were capable of such an undertaking there is no reason to suppose that what they did cannot be accomplished by Indians”

The problem of majority-minority will continue

“the musalmans are scattered all over Hindustan-though they are mostly congregated in towns and no ingenuity in the matter of redrawing of boundaries can make it homogenous. The only way to make Hindustan homogenous is to arrange for exchange of population. Until that is done, it must be admitted that even with the creation of Pakistan, the problem of majority vs. minority will remain in Hindustan as before and will continue to produce disharmony in the body politic of Hindustan ”

 

English, Islam

Is there any peaceful verse in Quran?

Leave a comment

0Quran-550x334-450x303Many Muslims as well as Non-Muslims quote some verses from Qur’an which preaches peace, and Non-Violence, while discussing Violent teaching of Islam. These people simply copy-paste from some Islamic site, which is a very desperate move to prove Islam is a Peaceful Religion. In this article I’ll show the real meaning of those so-called peaceful verses, using their context and the historical reasons behind the revelation of those alleged peaceful verse of Quran.

But let us see first, what mainly Islamic sites say about Qur’an and Peace. “Islam as a religion is totally committed to peace and security. It views with great contempt, breach of peace, anarchy, rioting and terrorism. Muslims as Ummah are a peace-loving community. Jehad under Islam is allowed subject to certain conditions.” [Daroolum-Deoband]

One another site says, “The very word ‘Islam’ (from the Arabic silm) connotes peace. According to a tradition of the Prophet, ‘Peace is Islam’ (Al-Bukhari). This means that peace is one of the prerequisites of Islam. Similarly, a Hadith states: A Muslim is one from whose tongue and hands people are safe. One of the attributes of God described in the Quran is‘As-Salam’, which means peace and security.’ That is to say that God’s Being itself is a manifestation of peace. Indeed, God is Peace (Al-Bukhari). In the Quran divine guidance is likened to the paths of peace. (5:16)” [Islam 101]

Before I proceed I would like to clear one misconception of Muslims and the author of above quote. It is not necessary that a man named ‘Satyavan’, which literally mean ‘Observer of Truth’, is truthful. In very same way it hardly matters what the word ‘Islam’ means, because its teaching, practices and actions of Muslim are incompatible with its meaning, i.e. peaceful. Leave aside the hadith example for now, because it is said that those Hadiths contradicts Quran are unauthentic, so by end of article readers will be convinced that the above quoted Hadith is unauthentic.

So by the above example, we see what Islamic scholar say about Islam and Peace, I agree there are very few verse which can be interpreted as peaceful verse in Qur’an. The very common verse which Muslims quote to prove Islam is a peaceful religion is2:256, which reads:-

Yusuf Ali

Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things.

This verse is usually quoted by Islamic scholar because it says ‘let there be no compulsion in religion.’ But this verse is not as peaceful as it sounds, and to prove it, let’s see the historical context of the verse. One of Islamic site explains this verse as following:-

The scholars explained that these two verses [10:99 and 2:256], and other similar verses, have to do with those from whom the jizyah may be taken, such as Jews, Christians and Magians (Zoroastrians). They are not to be forced, rather they are to be given the choice between becoming Muslim or paying the jizyah.

Other scholars said that this applied in the beginning, but was subsequently abrogated by Allaah’s command to fight and wage jihad. So whoever refuses to enter Islam should be fought when the Muslims are able to fight, until they either enter Islam or pay the jizyah if they are among the people who may pay jizyah. The kuffaar should be compelled to enter Islam if they are not people from whom the jizyah may be taken, because that will lead to their happiness and salvation in this world and in the Hereafter. Obliging a person to adhere to the truth in which is guidance and happiness is better for him than falsehood. Just as a person may be forced to do the duty that he owes to other people even if that is by means of imprisonment or beating, so forcing the kaafirs to believe in Allaah alone and enter into the religion of Islam is more important and more essential, because this will lead to their happiness in this world and in the Hereafter. This applies unless they are People of the Book, i.e., Jews and Christians, or Magians, because Islam says that these three groups may be given the choice: they may enter Islam or they may pay the jizyah and feel themselves subdued. ” [Source]

As we see in above explanation, that in verse 2:256, Allah is giving Non-Muslims a choice, between Islam or Jizyah, which Muslims say as  ‘No Compulsion in religion’. If the above given explanation is true then we can’t say that this verse is peaceful. Many Islamic scholars also believe that Qur’an 2:256 is abrogated by Qur’an 9:5-6, which clearly says Muslims to fight and kill the polytheists, and leave them when they become Muslim. There is a Hadith recorded in Sahih Bukhari, which also supports Quran 9:5-6, which reads:-

Volume 1, Book 2, Number 25:

Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:

Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”

So, we see that either the verse is abrogated by later revealed verse of sword, or does not mean the same which Muslims wants us to believe. Even the Sharia Law proves that, Muslims don’t practice this verse. Non-Muslims are not allowed to preach, build their House of Worship, or propagate their religion in Islamic country. [Source]

Another verse which is widely quoted by Muslims to prove that their religion support peace, and Non-Violence is Qur’an 109:6, which says:-

“For you is your religion, and for me is my religion.”

But when we look back into Historical Background of this verse, it again turns to be less polite verse, than it is said by Muslims. This verse was revealed when some Meccan leaders, Abu Jahl, Walid and others suggested compromise with Muhammad, and they said to Muhammad, that he can worship his God at the same time as the Meccan deities, or alternatively each year. [Historical Development of Qur’an, page 9]

They (Meccans) wanted peace from Muhammad, and wanted to create harmony among Muslims and Non-Muslims, but Allah instantly revealed this Chapter to reply those leaders, who demanded Harmony and Peace. So, as we see this verse is not peaceful, but was revealed to reply an offer made by Meccan leaders for peace.

Further regarding this verse, Ibn Abbas says:-

(Unto you your religion) of disbelief and ascribing partners to Allah, (and unto me my religion) Islam and faith in Allah. The verses of fighting then abrogated this and the Prophet (pbuh) did fight them’

So, even if we consider this verse peaceful, early Islamic scholars thinks says that this verse is abrogated, and prophet did fight those who did not accepted Islam.

The above quoted verse is followed by Qur’an 8:61, which says:-

 And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah . Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing.

Ibn Jalalayan in his explanation to this verse says:-

And if they incline to peace (read silm or salm, meaning, ‘settlement’), then incline to it, and conclude a pact with them: Ibn ‘Abbās said, ‘This has been abrogated by the “sword verse” [Q. 9:5]’; Mujāhid said, ‘This [stipulation] applies exclusively in the context of the People of the Scripture, for it was revealed regarding the Banū Qurayza; and rely on God, put your trust in Him; truly He is the Hearer, of words, the Knower, of actions.

So, again we reached to the same conclusion that even if handful of verses in Quran like 8:61, 2:256,109:6 etc are  peaceful verses, but they are abrogated by Qur’an 9:5. Finally we can say that the Peaceful verses in Qur’an are of Meccan period when Muhammad had very less followers, so Allah did not dared to reveal violent verses, and most of peaceful verses in Qur’an is abrogated by the verse of sword which was last to be revealed when Muhammad became strong, then Allah commanded Muslims to kill Non-Believers, until they embrace Islam or pay Jizyah, and feel themselves subdued. [Qur’an 9:5 and 9:29]

So the answer to the question: Is there any peaceful verse in Quran?

Ans: There were few peaceful verses in Quran revealed in Meccan period when Muhammad hardly had 70 followers, but later when he formed a monstrous army of hooligans ,marauders and raiders, then eventually Allah the shock puppet of Muhammad abrogated all the peaceful verses with the violent ones, and ordered Muhammad and his army to kill those who dared to be different in religious views. 

[subscribe2]

English, Great Aryas, Islam

The Assassin

Leave a comment

Somehow to Abdul Rashid is being given credit for what he as an ordinary man could never have done. He owed no grudge to Swami Shraddhananda. The latter had done him no personal wrong. Till before the Counsel for him disillusioned him under the awe of legal justice, he is reported to have been proud of what he regarded to be greatest service he could have done to his religion.

And how do his co-religionists take it? We thought it was a misguided editor who justified the deed of Abdul Rashid as being in accordance with Islamic Law. The other day in a mass meeting in Lahore, speaker after speaker condemned Shraddhananda instead of Abdual Rashid for the murder. One went so far as to say that under a Muslim Government the sword ( it was a revolver which in the flow of Urdu oratory was termed sword) which killed Shraddhananda or a man like him should have been kissed with reverence and affection. Another, to match presumably the exhortation of Arya Samajists that the blood of the martyr will prove prolific in producing a corps of Shraddhanandas, declared that if Aryas persisted in their course, thousands of Abdul Rashidswould  forthcoming. The desire of the two communities will thus be most befittingly met.

One who has gone through Islamic literature will not be surprised at this ebullition of fanatic feeling. The tendency to kill non – Islamwith the sword dates from the time of Mohammad. We reproduce below a few of the commandments of the Quran in this regard with authoritative orthodox comment thereon and shall supplement these divine behests with quotation from books containing traditions of Prophet and excerpts from books of Islamic law governing Mohammadan jurisprudence to day.

  1. O! those who believe? If anyone you turn away from his faith, well, God will send a people whom you will love and who will love you (Quran VI54) The Wuran appears to have omitted to the state here what to do with the apostate. He was presumably to be left to his fate. Commentators on the Quran however fill up the gaps says Bezavi: God gave tidiings of these happenings before they took place. These tribes apostatized towards the end of Mohammad’s life. One of them was BanuMudlaj… The chief was killed by FairozBailami in the night of the prophet’s death. The news was carried to the prophet and Mohammadans rejoiced. Similar also was the fate of other tribes which Bezavi narrates in the lines that follow. In the verse that follows the Quran is itself explicit:- and if they turn away (from their faith), take hold of them and kill them where you find them (IV-89-9- and if they turn away (from their faith), take hold of them and kill them where you find them (IV-89-9- and if they turn away (from their faith), take hold of them and kill them where you find them (IV-89-9- and if they turn away (from their faith), take hold of them and kill them where you find them (IV-89-90) No comment is deeded on this passage. The words enclosed within brackets are taken from Bezavi to make the meaning of the text clear. The former of theses versed is explained in Bukhari, whose place among the collectors of traditions is foremost. In the chapter bearing on the Acceptance or Non acceptance of Repentance from Apostates this verse is quoted as deciding this important issues. Difference of opinion is shown to exist among alumni as to the final decree to be based on of the injunction of verses. That the apostate should be murdered all are unanimous. Whether to give him three days respite and allow him to recant if the will is the pint at issue. Dar Qitni is said to have reported on the authority of Jabir that the prophet ordered the murder of a woman who apostatized in his life time. A few pages further a man is stated to have come to th Prophet to take with him the governor whom the latter appointed over the province of Yaman. Moaz was sent to fill that office and as he saw a man bound hand and foot and learnt on inquiry that he was an apostate from Islam he refused to sit till the later was murdered as this he said was the behest of Allah and the Prophet.

  2. The same stories are repeated in other book of traditions. Asection among Mohammadans aver that these commandments and decisions brutal on the face of them were dictated by the exigencies of time which to day do not exist. We regard the whole Quran to have been dictated by exigencies of time which too fortunately do not exist today. The pity is that Mohammadan priests whose writings have regulated Mohammadan jurisprudence till this time and whose interpretation of Mohammadan law governs even today all codes of judicial laws for Mohammandans have perpetuated these exigencies into eternal demand of God appointed law. An excerpt from Hedaya will be found to the point. The compilation of this book does not belong to the age of Mohammad but to an age centuries later. Mohammadan low is even today framed in accordance with the decree of this book.

“when a mussulman apostatizes from the faith an exposition thereof is to be laid before him in such a manner that if his apostasy should have raised from any religious doubts or scruples those may be removed. The reason for laying an exposition of the faith before him is that it is possible some doubts or errors may have arisen in his mind. Which may be removed by such exposition and as there are two modes of repelling the sin of apostasy namely destruction or Islam and Islam is preferable to destruction the evil is rather to be removed by means of an exposition of the faith is not incumbent according to what the learned have remarked upon this head (since a call to the faith has already reached the apostate.)
“as apostate is to be imprisoned for three days; within which time if he returns to the faith it is well but if not he must be slain. It is recorded in the Jam’s Sagheer that ‘an exposition of the faith is to be laid before an apostate and if he refuses the faith he must be slain and with respect to what is above stated that he is to be imprisoned for three days, it only implied that if he requires a delay three days must be granted him as such is the term generally admitted and allowed for the purpose of consideration. It is recorded from Hanifa and AbouJusef that the granting of a delay of three days is land able whether that apostate requires it or not and it is recorded from Shafai that is not lawful for him to put th apostate to death before that lapse of this time . since it is most problem that a Mussulman will not apostatize but from some doubt or error arising in his mind; wherefore some time is necessary for consideration and this is fixed at three days. The arguments of our doctors upon this point are two fold. First God says in the Koran “Slay the unbeliever” without any reserve of a delay of three days being granted to him and the Prophet has also said “Slay the man who change his religion” without mentioning anything concerning a delay. Secondly an apostate is an infidel enemy who has received a call to the faith wherefore he may be slain upon the instant without any delay. An apostle is termed on this occasion an infidel enemy because he is undoubtedly such and he is not protected since he has not required a protection neither is he a Zimmee because capitation tax has not been accepted from him hence it is proved that he is an infidel enemy. It is to be observed that in these rules there is not difference made between an apostate who is a freeman and one who is a slave as the arguments upon which they are established apply equally to both description.

 

If an apostate dies or be slain in his apostasy his property acquired during his profession of the faith goes to his heirs who are Mussulman and whatever he acquired during the apostasy is public property of community of Mussulmans that is it goes to the public treasury. This is according to Hanifa….

All acts of an apostate with respect to his property such as purchases sale manumission mortgages and gift done during his apostasy are suspended in their effect. If therefore he becomes a Mussalman those acts are valid but if he dies or be slain or desert into a foreign country those acts are null.

“if any person kills an apostate before an exposition of the faith has been laid open to him. It is abominable that is it is laudable to let him continue unmolested. Nothing however is incurred by the slayer because the infidelity of an alien(?) renders the killing of him admissible and an exposition of the faith after a call to the faith is not necessary.

“ if a Mussulman woman becomes an apostate she is no put to  death but is imprisoned until she returns to the faith. Shafei maintains that she is to be put to death because of the tradition before cited and also because as men are put to death for apostasy solely for this reason that it is a crimes of great magnitudes and therefore requires that its punishment to proportionately savers (namely, death) so the apostasy for woman being likewise (like that of a man ) a crime of great magnitude it follows that her punishment should be the same at that of a man.

“if a husband and wife both apostatize and desert to a foreign country and the woman becomes pregnant there and brings forth a child and to this child another child be afterwards born and the Mussulman troops then subdue the territory the child and the child both are plunder and the property of the state the child is so  because as the apostate mother is made a slave her child is so likewise as a dependent on her and the child’s child is so because he is an original infidel and an enemy and as an original infidel is fee or the property of the state so is he woman’s child may moreover be compelled to become a Mussulman but not the child’s child. Hassan records from Haneefa that compulsion may be used upon the child’s child or so to make him embrace the faith as a dependent of the grandfather.

Our last quotation is from Sir Abdul Rahim’s Mohammedan Jurisprudence a recent complain which may be fairly thought to represent sound Muslim opinion as to the award of Islam in all matters of vital importance to that faith.

Apostasy  or change of faith from Islam to infidelity places the apostate outside the protection of law. The law however by way of indulgence gives the apostate a certain locus penitential. For instance he will be first asked to conform to the faith and if he entertains any doubt efforts must be made to remove it by argument he will be given an option of three days to re embrace the faith before the sentence is passed on him . but since by the very fact of apostacy a man losses the protection of law, if even before the chance of re embracing the faith has been given to him a Muslim kills an apostate it will be considered as an improper act but he would incur no penalty of the law. So long as the sentence has not been passed on an apostate he will be allowed according to the two disciple to retain possession of this property but according to Abu Hanfait passes to his heirs at the instance of apostacy.

Shraddhananda was surely not an apostate but a potent instigator to the crime (?) no doubt. Maulana Abdul Bari on the occasion of the Unity Conference which was a sequel to Mahatma Gandhi’s 21stdays fast id Delhi, demanded that apostacy from Islam should be punished also in India if not with death with at least imprisonment as it is in the Bhopal State.

What the advocates of religious liberty both Muslim and Non Muslim have to fight is this barbarous attitude of Islamic jurisprudence and not an individual Abdul Rashid who like millions of his misguided brethren is a victim of blind faith and deserves our pity rather than contempt and indignation.

English, Islam, इस्लाम

Jews asked Allah’s prophet three questions!

Leave a comment

jews

Jews asked Allah’s prophet three questions!

Posted by 

arab jews in the time of mohamed was asked by the pagans leaders to verify whether mohamed is a prophet or not by giving them some questions to ask him about.

they gave them this three questions and told them “if he know the answer of this three questions
the man is a prophet follow him,if not he is pretending do with him whatever you like.

the questions was
1-few youth in the first age ,what was there matter? these youth had an amazing matter

2-a man covered the earth till he reached its east and west,what was his matter?

3-what is the soul? http://yasharya.wordpress.com/2013/05/12/allah-quranic-embryology-and-the-soul/

the answer to the three questions was revealed to mohamed in Quran chapter 18 (the cave)

http://www.allahsquran.com/read/verses.php?ch=18

Q1.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091204010057AAfrnTt

018.010

Sahih International: [Mention] when the youths retreated to the cave and said, “Our Lord, grant us from Yourself mercy and prepare for us from our affair right guidance.”

018.025

Sahih International: And they remained in their cave for three hundred years and exceeded by nine.
Can any man sleep without food/water and live for 309 years?   You need to lock ur brain in a safe and forget it there to believe this !! 
Q2
Now who was dhul qarnein?
Sadly, the islamic scholars are not sure. Allah did not clarify the identity of dhul qarnein.
018.086

Sahih International: Until, when he reached the setting of the sun, he found it [as if] setting in a spring of dark mud, and he found near it a people. We [Allah] said, “O Dhul-Qarnayn, either you punish [them] or else adopt among them [a way of] goodness.”
So where did he go? To the place where he found the sun setting in a pool of muddy waters. Where is that place? Allah failed to clarify again!!
for more detail visit : http://yasharya.wordpress.com
English, Islam

Zakir Naik, Ayesha, The Prophet & Ayurveda.

Leave a comment

Illustration of the Death of Muhammad

Zakir Naik, Ayesha, The Prophet & Ayurveda.

Posted by 

Mulla Naseeruddinji

Listen to what Zakir naik says in this video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uAYq-5bmQfI

He says that MAYBE Ayesha attained puberty and thus the consummation of marriage by Mohammed was right.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
Narrated ‘Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

Sahih Bukhari 7.18
Narrated ‘Ursa:
The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “But I am your brother.” The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

Sahih Bukhari 9.140
Narrated ‘Aisha:
Allah’s Apostle said to me, “You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘Uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.

Sahih Bukhari 5.236.
Narrated Hisham’s father:
Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311
‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 41, Number 4915,  also  Number 4916  and  Number 4917
Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came. according to Bishr’s version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311
‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151 
Narrated ‘Aisha:
I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)

Compare this conduct with the teachings of with Ayurveda [upang of atharvaveda]

Sushruta Sutrasthane Adhyaya 35/10
panchvimshe tato varshe puman nari tu shodashe………kushalo bhishaka
The wise men agree that for marriage and conception the man should be at least 25 yrs of age and the woman should be at least 16 yrs of age.

Sushruta Sutrasthane Adhyaya 10/47-48
uunshodashvarshayamprapta:………na karyet.
In case a man aged less than 25 places his seed in a girl aged less than 16 ; either the child will be born dead , or will not live long or even if it lives it will have weak senses.

Further, Manu writes in Adhyaya 3/5

pumanpunsodhike shukre stri bhavatyadhike striya:……viparyaya:

That if a man’s discharge exceeds a woman’s he will get a boy……

NOW WHAT DO WE READ IN THIS HADITH:

Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:

Narrated Qatada:
Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, “Had the Prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men).” And Sa’id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven).

Mulla Naseeruddinji, tell me how many boys did your Prophet beget?
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_to_Muhammad .
“ None of Muhammad’s sons survived into adulthood” !!
I am sure that u would have understood why the Prophet lost many of his children before they attained maturity.!

Therefore, man should adhere to Brahmcharya till 25 yrs and marry girls above 16 to to beget sons & daughters who lead a long & healthy life. [brahmcharya is one of the yama(s) in Patanjali Yogasutras. In case a man indulges in too much sex he will contract diseases like PRAMEH & MADHUMEH or Diabetes which might render him IMPOTENT at a later stage].

Observe:

Brahmcharyen tapsa deva mrityumpagnata ! Atharva 11/5/19
By Fervour and by self-restraint the Learned/Erudite persons [deva=Vidwaan, Eeshwar, etc] drove Death away  from them.
R. Griffith  translates Deva=God here which is incorrect. The context is brahmcharya and AUM is pure Consciousness. Where is the relevance of brahmcharya for AUM? http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/av/av11005.htm

ahinsa satyaasteyabrahmcharyaparigraha yama: II2/30II

2.30 Self-restraint in actions (yama) includes abstention from violence, from falsehoods, from stealing, from sexual engagements, and from acceptance of gifts. http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/yogasutr.htm

CONCLUSION: Rishi Charaka & Rishi Manu who worshipped AUM knew much MORE than the Prophet of Allah.

namaste

for more details visit : http://yasharya.wordpress.com

English, Islam

Ayesha said: Are you not the one falsely claiming/presuming to be the Messenger of Allah?

Leave a comment

married-to-children

Ayesha said: Are you not the one falsely claiming/presuming

to be the Messenger of Allah?

Posted  by 

http://wilayat.net/index.php/en/shia-sunni/63-aisha-bint-abi-bakr/523-did-he-marry-his-aunt

Did Prophet Marry His Aunt???

Details
Parent Category: Shia/Sunni: Articles
Category: Aisha bint Abi Bakr
Published on Thursday, 06 August 2009 13:17
Written by Guided
In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful

We read in Musnad Ahmad 6/409, Hadith 26050:

عن سعيد بن المسيب : أن خولة بنت حكيم السلمية وهي إحدى خالات النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم

Narrated Sa’eed ibn al-Musayab:

Khaula bint Hakim al-Salamiyah was one of the aunts of the Prophet.

Shaykh al-Arnaut says:

حديث حسن

The hadith is hasan.

In short, according to Sunnis, Khaula bint Hakim al-Salamiyah was an aunt to the Holy Prophet

Then, we read this:

Narrated Hisham’s father:

Khaula bint Hakim was one of those ladies who presented themselves to the Prophet for marriage. ‘Aisha said, “Doesn’t a lady feel ashamed for presenting herself to a man?” But when the Verse: “(O Muhammad) You may postpone (the turn of) any of them (your wives) that you please,’ (33.51) was revealed, ” ‘Aisha said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! I do not see, but, that your Lord hurries in pleasing you.’ “
Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 48

For now, let us ignore Aisha’s blasphemous comments about Allah (swt). But, what does this seem to suggest? Well, to make things clearer, al-Hafiz al-Asqalani in his commentary of the above hadith in his Fath al-Bari (Dar al-Ma’rifat, Beirut) 9/164 states:

هي خولة بنت حكيم السلمية

She was Khaula bint Hakim al-Salamiyah.

If that is not clear enough, we read:

عن خولة بنت حكيم وكان رسول الله صلى الله عليه سلم تزوجها

Narrated Khaula bint Hakim, and the Messenger of Allah married her ….

Majma’ al-Zawaid 9/418, No. 15410 (declares its chain hasan)

Mu’jam al-Awsat 1/204

So, in other words, the Holy Prophet, according to Sunni books, probably married one of his own aunts?

As for Aisha’s verbal attack against Allah (swt), that should be nothing really. This is because she never believed in the prophethood of Muhammad . Well, before you make any objections, read this. This is from Musnad Abu Ya’la (Dar al-Mamun lil Turath, Damascus, first print, 1984; annotator: Husayn Salim Asad) 8/129 No. 4670. It is Aisha’s angry statement to the Holy Prophet :

ألست تزعم إنك رسول الله ؟

Are you not the one falsely claiming/presuming to be the Messenger of Allah?

This accusation hurt Abubakr, who was present, so much that he slapped her! Well, whatever the case, she said it. And whether Abubakr too was only pretending, in unclear.

Husayn Salim Asad, the annotator, states:

رجاله ثقات

Its narrators are trustworthy.

………………………………………..

Q1 : Is it right to marry one’s auntie? I mean where do u stop?

Q2. Why should we believe a man to  be a prophet of god when his [most beloved] wife did not consider/believe him to be one?

English, Islam

Age of Ayesha at marriage with Mohammed saheb

3 Comments

aisha

Age of Ayesha at marriage with Mohammed saheb

Posted on by 

#1798 – Dr. Ahmad Al-Mub’i, a Saudi Marriage Officianl: It Is Allowed to Marry a Girl at the Age of One, If Sex Is Postponed. The Prophet Muhammad, Whose Model We Follow, Married ‘Aisha When She Was Six and Had Sex with Her When She Was Nine
LBC TV (Lebanon) – June 19, 2008 – 03:08

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1798.htm

#4004 – Tragic Consequences of Child Marriage in Yemen Revealed in TV Report
Sky News Arabia (U.K./Abu Dhabi) – September 18, 2013 – 01:54

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/4004.htm

Aisha the Child Wife of Muhammad

By Ali Sina 

The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the Holy Prophet married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and consummated his marriage with her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.
Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
Narrated ‘Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65
Narrated ‘Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that ‘Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).” what you know of the Quran (by heart)’

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88 
Narrated ‘Ursa:
The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).

Some Muslims claim that it was Abu Bakr who approached Muhammad asking him to marry his daughter. This is of course not true and here is the proof.

Sahih Bukhari 7.18
Narrated ‘Ursa:
The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “But I am your brother.” The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

Arabs were a primitive lot with little rules to abide. Yet they had some code of ethics that they honored scrupulously. For example, although they fought all the year round, they abstained from hostilities during certain holy months of the year. They also considered Mecca to be a holy city and did not make war against it. A adopted son’s wife was deemed to be a daughter in law and they would not marry her. Also it was customary that close friends made a pact of brotherhood and considered each other as true brothers. The Prophet disregarded all of these rules anytime they stood between him and his interests or whims.

Abu Bakr and Muhammad had pledged to each other to be brothers. So according to their costoms Ayesha was supposed to be like a niece to the Holy Prophet. Yet that did not stop him to ask her hand even when she was only six years old.

But this moral relativist Prophet would use the same excuse to reject a woman he did not like.

Sahih Bukhari V.7, B62, N. 37
Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
It was said to the Prophet, “Won’t you marry the daughter of Hamza?” He said, “She is my foster niece (brother’s daughter). “

Hamza and Abu Bakr both were the foster brothers of Muhammad. But Ayesha must have been too pretty for the Prophet to abide by the codes of ethics and custom.

In the following Hadith he confided to Ayesha that he had dreamed of her before soliciting her from her father.

Sahih Bukhari 9.140
Narrated ‘Aisha:
Allah’s Apostle said to me, “You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘Uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.

Whether Muhammad had actually such dream or he just said it to please Ayesha is not the point. What matters here is that it indicates that Ayesaha was a baby being “carried” by an angel when the Prophet dreamed of her.

There are numerous hadithes that explicitly reveal the age of Ayesha at the time of her marriage. Here are some of them.

Sahih Bukhari 5.236.
Narrated Hisham’s father:
Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married ‘Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

Sahih Bukhari 5.234
Narrated Aisha:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

And in another Hadith we read.

Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 41, Number 4915,  also  Number 4916  and  Number 4917
Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came. according to Bishr’s version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.

In the above hadith we read that Ayesha was swinging, This is a play of little girls not grown up people. The following Hadith is particularly interesting because it shows that Ayesha was so small that was not aware what was going on when the Holy Prophet “surprised” her by going to her.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 90 
Narrated Aisha:
When the Prophet married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah’s Apostle to me in the forenoon.
Must have been quite a surprise! But the following is also interesting because it demonstrates that she was just a kid playing with her dolls. Pay attention to what the interpreter wrote in the parenthesis. (She was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty)

Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151 
Narrated ‘Aisha:
I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3311
‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

The holy Prophet died when he was 63. So he must have married Ayesha when he as 51 and went to her when he was 54.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 33 
Narrated ‘Aisha:
I never felt so jealous of any woman as I did of Khadija, though she had died three years before the Prophet married me, and that was because I heard him mentioning her too often, and because his Lord had ordered him to give her the glad tidings that she would have a palace in Paradise, made of Qasab and because he used to slaughter a sheep and distribute its meat among her friends.
Khadija died in December of 619 AD. That is two years before Hijra. At that time the Prophet was 51-years-old. So in the same year that Khadija died the prophet married Ayesha and took her to his home 3 years later, i.e. one year after Hijra. But until she grow up he married Umm Salama.

In another part Ayesha claims that as long as she remembers her parents were always Muslims.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 245

Narrated ‘Aisha:
(the wife of the Prophet) I never remembered my parents believing in any religion other than the true religion (i.e. Islam),

If Ayesha was older i.e. 16 or 18 as some Muslims claim, she would have remembered the religion of her parents prior to becoming Muslims.

Now someone may still claim that all these hadithes are lies. People are free to say whatever they want. But truth is clear like the Sun for those who have eyes.

for more detail visit :http://yasharya.wordpress.com

English, Islam

Allah, quranic embryology and the soul !

Leave a comment

Allah, quranic embryology and the soul !

Posted embryos by 

Arya siddhanti: Did allah tutor mohammed saheb about the soul?

Mulla Naseeruddin:

During the lifetime of the Prophet (saws) the Jews of Medina sent their allies, the Makkan infidels [idolators], to the Prophet (saws) to ask about the soul. In reply to their questions, the following Qur’anic verse was revealed:

“They ask you [O Muhammad (saws] concerning the Ruh (Soul). Say: ‘It is one of the things, the knowledge of which is only with my Lord. And of knowledge, you (mankind) have been given very little.”

[Qur’an Al-Israa 17: 85]

http://www.missionislam.com/knowledge/Soul.htm

Sahih Muslim Book 033, Hadith Number 6390.

Sahih Muslim Book 33. Destiny
Chapter : The growth of a child in the womb of a mother and his destiny in regard to his livelihood, his deeds. both good and evil.Abdullah (b. Mas’ud) reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) who is the most truthful (of the human beings) and his being truthful (is a fact) said: Verily your creation is on this wise. The constituents of one of you are collected for forty days in his mother’s womb in the form of blood, after which it becomes a clot of blood in another period of forty days. Then it becomes a lump of flesh and forty days later Allah sends His angel to it with instructions concerning four things, so the angel writes down his livelihood, his death, his deeds, his fortune and misfortune. By Him, besides Whom there is no god, that one amongst you acts like the people deserving Paradise until between him and Paradise there remains but the distance of a cubit, when suddenly the writing of destiny overcomes him and he begins to act like the denizens of Hell and thus enters Hell, and another one acts in the way of the denizens of Hell, until there remains between him and Hell a distance of a cubit that the writing of destiny overcomes him and then he begins to act like the people of Paradise and enters Paradise.
Scholars of Islam have concluded from this hadeeth that because the angel of life blows the soul into the fetus when it is 120 days old, abortion on very strict medical grounds is permissible only before the fetus is 4 months old. Once life has been blown into the fetus it becomes a living creature and to terminate its life is murder.
Arya Siddhanti: U r saying that the soul is blown into the fetus on the 121st day. How does the fetus grow for 120 days without the soul? If it can grow for 120 days then why can’t it grow till 250-280 days ?  Why does a person need a soul at all?
Mulla;

 Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim wrote in his scholarly work “Kitab al Ruh”,

” Ruh is an entity which differs totally from the physical body. It is a subtle, ecclesiastical, enlightened living and moving body which penetrates into the depths of the organs and flows into them like the water in the rose or the oil in the olive or the fire in the coal. As long as these organs remain able to accept the impressions of this subtle body, the ‘Ruh’ remains attached to these organs and provides them with feeling and movement. But when these organs are spoiled because of the dominance of diseased elements upon it, and they are no longer able to accept the impressions of the soul, it leaves the body and heads towards the world of the souls. “

There is some difference in the way the words ‘Ruh’ and ‘Nafs’ are used. The ‘Ruh’ is the subtle spirit, which resides in the heavens and needs a physical body to carry it on the earth. When this spirit is given a body, life begins and it is described as ‘Nafs’. The word ‘Nafs’ is used in a number of ways by the Qur’an, all of which imply the meaning of a soul with a body.

1. ‘Nafs’ meaning “Self.”

“You know what is in my self but I do not know what is in Your self”

(Qur’an Al-Ma’ida 5:116)

2. ‘Nafs’ meaning “Blood”.

“The (insect) which has flowing Nafs (blood).”

3. Nafs as a strong force in man, which can push him either towards good or evil. The concept of ‘Nafs al Ammara bis Su’ (‘Nafs’ which encourages evil) and ‘Nafs al Lawwama’(‘Nafs’ which blames) and ‘Nafs al Mutmainna’ (‘Nafs’ which is contented) .

Two deaths and two lives

The Qur’an mentions two deaths and two lives given to us by Allah

“How can you reject faith in Allah, seeing that you were dead and He gave you life. Then He will cause you to die, then He will bring you to life, then to Him will be your return.”

(Qur’an Al-Baqarah 2: 28)

“They will say: Our Lord, twice have You given us death and twice have You given us life…”

(Qur’an Al Mumin : 11)

When the soul is first created it has no physical body and is considered to be a dead creature. In this state it is referred to as ‘Ruh’, and this is the first death as even death is created by Allah.

“He is the one who created Death and life in order that He may try which of you is best in deeds , and He is the Exalted, the Forgiving.”

(Qur’an Al Mulk 67: 2)

The Qur’an also tells us that all the souls of mankind were created before the creation of Adam and were asked to testify to the Lordship of Allah.

“When your Lord drew forth from the loins of the children of Adam their descendants, and made them testify concerning themselves: ‘Am I not your Lord?’. They said, ‘Yes, we do testify.’ This lest you should say on the Day of Judgement: ‘We were not aware of this.’ “

(Qur’an Al A’raaf :272)

The first life begins when the soul is breathed into an embryo in the womb of its mother, and now the soul is referred to as ‘Nafs’. The word Nafs is also used for ‘blood’, and so women who are in a state of post-natal bleeding are known as ‘Nufasaa’. As long as blood surges healthily through the body, there will be life in that body.

Regarding the 121st day “Allah knows best”.
Arya siddhanti: U want me to believe that the fetal heart starts beating without the soul in it. Ur embryology is a sham.
The fetal heart activity is among the earliest signs that the pregnancy is viable. The fetal heart rate can be seen by transvaginal sonogram TVS as early as 22 days after fertilization/ovulation or 5weeks 1 day after the last menstrual period. However, many times it’s not seen until 6 weeks and 0 days. By the time the embryo measures 2 mm the fetal heart rate activity should be seen and normal embryos start at under 85 beats per minute heart rate.
After reading this mumbo-jumbo my conclusion is as follows:
Allah does not know what is the soul, what is its function or properties, what is its material of construction, when does it enter the body, whether it is unborn or made, etc. Therefore the prophet and his muslims could not answer the question of the jews and the infidels [although they might have tried to find the answers from other people discreetly] .  Allah can do well by learning from AUM  or by reading the vedas, shastras , upanishads and ayurveda and clearing doubts from learned men. one should always improve on one’s shortcomings.
for more details visit : http://yasharya.wordpress.com
English, Islam

I bear witness that certainly Mohammed is the messenger of Allah !!

Leave a comment

Jibrail

I bear witness that certainly Mohammed is the messenger of Allah !!

Posted  by 

Mulla Naseeruddin: A muslim must recite the kalma !

Arya: What is contained in it?

Mulla Naseeruddin: There are 6 in all. The 1st says :There is no god but Allah, [and] Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. 

The 2nd says: I testify that (there is) no partner for Him. And I testify that certainly Muhammad (is) His worshipper and His Messenger.

[http://www.khwajagharibnawaz.net]


Arya: What is the proof that Mohammed is the messenger of Allah?

Mulla N: The proof is here:


Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 3:

Narrated ‘Aisha:

(the mother of the faithful believers) The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah’s Apostle was in the form of good dreams which came true like bright day light, and then the love of seclusion was bestowed upon him. He used to go in seclusion in the cave of Hira where he used to worship (Allah alone) continuously for many days before his desire to see his family. He used to take with him the journey food for the stay and then come back to (his wife) Khadija to take his food like-wise again till suddenly the Truth descended upon him while he was in the cave of Hira. The angel came to him and asked him to read. The Prophet replied, “I do not know how to read.

The Prophet added, “The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read and I replied, ‘I do not know how to read.’ Thereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read but again I replied, ‘I do not know how to read (or what shall I read)?’ Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me, and then released me and said, ‘Read in the name of your Lord, who has created (all that exists) has created man from a clot. Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous.” (96.1, 96.2, 96.3) Then Allah’s Apostle returned with the Inspiration and with his heart beating severely. Then he went to Khadija bint Khuwailid and said, “Cover me! Cover me!” They covered him till his fear was over and after that he told her everything that had happened and said, “I fear that something may happen to me.” Khadija replied, “Never! By Allah, Allah will never disgrace you. You keep good relations with your Kith and kin, help the poor and the destitute, serve your guests generously and assist the deserving calamity-afflicted ones.”

Khadija then accompanied him to her cousin Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin ‘Abdul ‘Uzza, who, during the PreIslamic Period became a Christian and used to write the writing with Hebrew letters. He would write from the Gospel in Hebrew as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to Waraqa, “Listen to the story of your nephew, O my cousin!” Waraqa asked, “O my nephew! What have you seen?” Allah’s Apostle described whatever he had seen. Waraqa said, “This is the same one who keeps the secrets (angel Gabriel) whom Allah had sent to Moses. I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out.” Allah’s Apostle asked, “Will they drive me out?” Waraqa replied in the affirmative and said, “Anyone (man) who came with something similar to what you have brought was treated with hostility; and if I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly.” But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while.

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah Al-Ansari while talking about the period of pause in revelation reporting the speech of the Prophet “While I was walking, all of a sudden I heard a voice from the sky. I looked up and saw the same angel who had visited me at the cave of Hira’ sitting on a chair between the sky and the earth. I got afraid of him and came back home and said, ‘Wrap me (in blankets).’ And then Allah revealed the following Holy Verses (of Quran):

‘O you (i.e. Muhammad)! wrapped up in garments!’ Arise and warn (the people against Allah’s Punishment),… up to ‘and desert the idols.’ (74.1-5) After this the revelation started coming strongly, frequently and regularly.”

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/001-sbt.php#001.001.003

Arya: Did anyone else see Jibril ? I mean is their any other witness ?

Mulla: NO ! Jibril was visible to him alone. See:

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 48

Narrated Abu Huraira:

One day while the Prophet was sitting in the company of some people, (The angel) Gabriel came and asked, “What is faith?” Allah’s Apostle replied, ‘Faith is to believe in Allah, His angels, (the) meeting with Him, His Apostles, and to believe in Resurrection.” Then he further asked, “What is Islam?” Allah’s Apostle replied, “To worship Allah Alone and none else, to offer prayers perfectly to pay the compulsory charity (Zakat) and to observe fasts during the month of Ramadan.”…………Then that man (Gabriel) left and the Prophet asked his companions to call him back, but they could not see him. Then the Prophet said, “That was Gabriel who came to teach the people their religion.” Abu ‘Abdullah said: He (the Prophet) considered all that as a part of faith.

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Angel_Jibreel

Arya : So a muslim must  believe this story in which a man comes and says that he saw an angel -Gabriel/ jibril who gave him the message of allah/god.  His wife believes him and takes him to her old and blind cousin who is a christian [and dies a christian] for support, who readily agrees that it was jibril!

Frankly speaking, this is a family affair, where each one is taking care of the others ‘beliefs’ !!

Mulla: Then u tell how vedas were revealed?

Arya: The vedas were revealed not to one but 4 rishis, each was a witness to the other 3.

Rishi Dayanand says  [http://www.aryasamajjamnagar.org/chapterseven.htm] :

Q 36. Whose hearts did God reveal the Vedas in?

A.-”In the beginning, God revealed the four Vedas, Rig, Vayu, Sama, and Atharva, to Agni, Vayu, A’ditya and Angira, respectively.” SHAPATHA BRAHMAN 11: 4,2,3.

Q.But it is written in the Shwetashwetar Upanishad, ” In the beginning God created Brahma and revealed the Vedas in his heart.”

SHWETA UPANISHAD 6:18. Why do you say that they were revealed to Agni, and other sages?

A.- Brahma was instructed in the knowledge of the Veda through the medium of the four sages , such as Agni. Mark what Manu says: “In the beginning after human being had been created, the Supreme Spirit made the Vedas known to Brahma through Agni, etc., i.e., Brahma learnt the four Vedas from Agni, Vayu, A’ditya and Angira.” MANU: 1/23

Thus the vedic dharma stands on solid ground where the knowledge revealed to one rishi is checked and corroborated by 3 other rishis.

You are a blind follower of a man who was unsure and fearful of his experiences in the cave of Hira. He was convinced by his wife’s christian cousin  Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin ‘Abdul ‘Uzza that Gabriel/jibril came to him from allah  for instructing him.

Therefore the recognition of Angel Gabriel [and hence Islam] rests on the testimony of a single blind old  christian cousin of the wife of Mohammed [who did not convert to Islam in his lifetime]. At this juncture, we should ask the following 3 basic questions:

Q: What is the proof that Gabriel/jibril exists??

Q: What is the proof that Waraqa bin Naufal was correct in his identification of Gabriel/jibril ?

Q: Why didn’t the messenger of allah recognize gabriel? [ Hence Waraqa is wiser than Mohammed and therefore Mohammed is not the prophet.]

Mulla: I will find out and tell . I shall leave now.

Arya: I hope u will not bear false witness until u find the answers to the above 3 questions.

Namaste.

for more detail visit :http://yasharya.wordpress.com