Tag Archives: Vedas

Vedas For Beginners 7 : What is meant by ghosts and spirits[ Bhuths and pretaas]?

K:  Do bodies like ghosts and spirits exist?  Number of stories is told on ghosts and spirits.  Talismans, threads are tied in an attempt to ward off evils. Mantras are muttered to drive away the spirits. There are exorcists claiming similar action. Is it correct?

V:  Really speaking, ghosts and spirits do not exist. What people say on the subject are just imaginary stories. Time has three dimensions, present, past, and future. Bhoot means past i.e., what is elapsed.   A deceased does not exist anymore. He is counted to as belonging to the past (Bhoota). Therefore, Bhoot refers to the person who is dead and gone. There is nothing called pretha (spirit). A dead person is called as pretha ( pra+ ita) which would also mean as one who has already gone away. In other words Bhoot and pretha refer to that person who was there earlier but not now because he is dead. People who say that they have seen these ethereal bodies, normally also claim that they could be seen in night only. How? All phony things occur only in night. Whether these men claiming to have seen such unearthly bodies possess catty eyes or whether these airy bodies are made of radium type substance that could be seen only in dark is for anybody to guess. All the big and minute things in the world could be seen either with our naked eyes or thru specially made lenses. If Bhoots and Pretas were to be some sort of human bodies definitely they would have been visible or not visible at all. Fact however is, it is generally said to be seen by a person who normally suffers from deliriums or convulsions or whose mind is heavily influenced by stories of Bhoots and Pretas. Otherwise men who are sound, in body and mind do not claim for having seen them. As per principles of psychology when the man’s mind is subjected to certain bad influences (psychological trauma) he would be visualizing pictures of some weird objects and scenes.  What is to be seriously pondered over here is that when a man is dead his body gets merged in the five elements of nature. And the soul takes a new body as per law of Karma. Then where is the question of Bhoot or pretha? Wherefrom it can originate?


If it is said that Bhoot or prêt refers to the subtle body then it should be clarified that the soul cannot discharge any bodily functions without the medium of gross physical body.  If, talisman, black threads, mumbo-jumbo, exorcism were capable of warding off diseases, then the ward of the men indulging in such spurious practices should never succumb to any disease? Is it so? Their children also die and so also they vanish one day. If mantras or mumbo-jumbo could cure men from diseases then where is the necessicity for Doctors and Hospitals? Funnily, the cat will be out of the bag when a person who is said to be possessed of spirit is confronted with a difficult problem. Person desirous of examining them should ask for a Veda Mantra from a person possessing such spirits in case he is a Hindu or he must be asked to recite versions of Koran in case he is a Muslim. If done, these tricksters stand thoroughly exposed. Further these fraudulent men employ some smart tricks here to fool the credulous. So when the common man is unable to understand these phenomenons they tend to think that they (men of spirits) are capable of controlling the spirits. Frankly speaking there are no spirits, but these thoughts keep nagging the weak and the doubting thamases. The truth however is, every person shall reap what he sows and there is no escape from this law.  . The just God is present everywhere and his law that person is rewarded or punished as per his previous karma or sanskars stands unchanged.


Do planets influence men and cause pleasures and pains?




K. Good! There may not be objects like spirits. But pleasures and pains are definitely caused by planets. We have to undergo the punishments inflicted by these nine planets. Astrology can never go wrong. Astrology is so perfect that it can predict the cosmic phenomenon like lunar eclipse and solar eclipse well before hand.


V. pains and pleasures are not due to planetary influences. They occur because of the outcome of ones deeds. The planets that are present would give neither pain nor pleasures to anybody. Planets do influence the earth each in its own way. The changes like happiness or sorrow that occur are dependent on the strength of the objects.  For ex, Sun is a star. Its light is found everywhere. Utilizing the sunlight a plant is growing tall with roots firmly embedded in the soil.  At another place there is tree which lies after being cut. The sun falls equally on the growing tree as well as on the tree that is cut. But it is only the uncut tree that is growing big and the severed tree is withering away fast due to sunlight. Whereas the sun is falling equally on both why the uncut tree is flourishing well and other is getting dried up? The same sun falls equally on iceberg and stone.  The stone becomes harder because of sunlight but the iceberg melts. A healthy eyed man enjoys the beauty of Nature made more enchanting by the shades of light whereas the man with the diseased eye shuns the sight of sun and feels unhappy. Now tell me whether this difference was caused by Sun? Did he do any mischief here?  What was the fault of Sun?  The changes, the pleasures or pains occur because of the strength of the object. Now look!  There are two parts present in Astrology.  That part which is based on mathematical calculations is called Astronomy could be called as scientific. The other which is predictive in nature and dependent on speculations on planetary movements is a pure myth. The lunar and solar eclipses are related to Astronomy. Therefore they can be predicted well in advance i.e. before months and years. The Sun, the Moon have been at work as per physical laws and the Astronomy is accordingly written. Astronomers have the knowledge of the movement of planets and they could therefore accurately predict when the eclipses could take place. Where there is certainty in the movements of the objects its influence could be known at once by mathematical calculations. There is definiteness in the movements in a clock. Any boy who is conversant with the reading of the clock could say with certainty when 12 Noon occurs. When both the needles are getting together at 12.during the day he would instantly say that it is 12 Noon.  This is possible because there is an accurate movement in a clock. Truly speaking, Astronomy is mathematics based science.  Astrology is a predictive mumbo-jumbo and Astronomy has been associated with this by default.


 Note :  This is the translated version of the original Hindi  ”Do bahinonke bathe” written by late Pt. Siddagopal”Kavirathna” .


Vedas For Beginners : Why be devoted to God?

K:  Sister! Please reply to yesterday’s question.


V:  Why to remain devoted to God? And why should we praise and pray Him was your yesterday’s question.

Well.  All things in the world aspire to get drawn towards its Primary source or centre of Power. This is applicable equally to both Conscious [chetan] and non-conscious or inert [Jada] bodies. Fire moves up and up for the reason that the Sun is the primary source of heat or Fire. Now consider another example. Throw a mud ball towards the Sky and however high it is thrown up ultimately it lands on the earth because Earth is the prime source of mud. Water gets evaporated from sea, because of Sun and the water so evaporated becomes a cloud. It starts raining and the water enters the rivers which ultimately join the sea, because sea is the prime source of water. So is the case of other materials also. Every material has its prime source.

Ocean is the Prime centre of water

Sun is the treasure house/ source of Fire

Sky is the Prime centre of Wind

Earth is the source of soil


Similarly Knowledge also has its prime source in the world. That is god. All the knowledge that man has acquired has been got from God. If a man could acquire the knowledge by himself without others assistance there was no necessity for schools, colleges, universities etc. Teachers were also found then not necessary. But this is not the case. Parents teach their children to talk and make them aware of so many things that surround them. They teach their children, how to eat, drink, dress etc. Behavior, etiquettes, inter-personal relationships etc are also taught. When these children enter schools they learn many other things. Here it should be also noted that what the teachers teach is also not theirs but what they would have learnt while at home, Schools and colleges before becoming teachers. Here a question arises. When the knowledge the men acquire is thru others who taught the human beings or the primary man at the time of Creation when there were no people before them? The answer is they got the knowledge from God only. Then how the Knowledge was given? How he taught them since He had no body? Here it may be clarified, that there exists a difference between revealing the knowledge and imparting them.  Teaching is done through sound and knowledge is revealed in heart. Since God is all pervading He is present in the human beings created at the time of Creation. Accordingly, God reveals the Knowledge in the souls of chosen Rishis Viz, Agni, Vayu, Aditya and Angira. These Rishis in turn teach the knowledge for others through the medium of Sound. Then starts the mechanism of teaching, i.e. reading and hear them reading, reciting etc.

If God had not given the knowledge, the tradition of transmission of knowledge would not have come off. It is therefore clear that whatever knowledge that man has acquired is thru the process of transmission only and whatever enlightenment he has obtained has become possible thru god given intelligence and by observing the nature of world created by god. Man can enhance the boundaries of knowledge but so long he is not administered knowledge he cannot obtain himself. In the beginning of Creation God has revealed the knowledge in the hearts and minds of Rishis in seed form. Subsequent growth of knowledge in expanded form [Tree form] is rendered possible thru the efforts of Rishis   and intelligent men. This is the rule from time immemorial and the same will continue in future also. When all things in the world are aspiring to get drawn to its prime source and still at it, why the soul with finite knowledge would not wish to move towards God who is the repository and source of infinite knowledge? This is because his evolution is not at all possible sans God. Conscious bodies evolve with conscious bodies and unconscious [inert] bodies with inert bodies.


The welfare of conscious soul is not possible by any inert things in the world. It is true however, that by intelligently utilizing the inert matters the well being of body is definitely ensured. The soul however, bound as it is by limited knowledge [i.e. remaining Alpagna] seeks improvement in the worldly things but fails.  Hence he remains restless. Ignorance is the reason for unhappiness in the world. If soul were to understand the true nature of materials obtaining in the world, he will not experience unhappiness or sorrow. The soul becomes enmeshed in sorrow and shackles so long it keeps equating untruth to truth, ignorance to knowledge and conscious to inanimate. God who is the source of knowledge is the real source of happiness. Removed from God happiness does not lie in worldly things. If happiness could be found in worldly things then the entire world should have looked happy and cheerful. But the actual position is different. Every conscious being in the world seeks happiness, because it is not with him.  Why he should seek happiness if he already had?  He becomes  liberated with worldly sorrows and bondages and attains eternal happiness called Bliss[Ananda] in the end when while remaining devoted  keeps on doing praise[ Stuti] prayer[ Prarthana]and communion[ Upaasana]


K: It is wrong to say that there is no pleasure or happiness in the worldly things. If there were to be no happiness in them, then why they should be much sought after by men? If money were not to bring happiness why people would have struggled to accumulate it? If food were not cause happiness why they would have consumed it? Why wear clothes if they were not to cause happiness? Why construct Homes if they were not to bring in pleasure and happiness?  All this indicate that there is happiness in worldly things. Hence, people desire to have them and do not want to give them up. He finds happiness in their acquisition and feels unhappy at its loss. Then how to believe that happiness is not found in material things?


V:  Sister! What you find happiness in worldly objects is not real happiness but illusion of it. Happiness is in the minds of men. When a man makes use of things he feels comforted and comes to believe that happiness is obtained from them only. But frankly speaking, happiness is not obtained from a particular thing. He feels happy so because of

mind’s concentration. When a dog bites a dry bone, its gums starts bleeding and the dog [unaware of the fact that dry bone cannot have a blood] keeps on sucking the blood oozing from its own gums! Similarly where is the happiness in the worldly things outside? Happiness lies inside. This is known. If money were to spell happiness, then no rich man would have been unhappy. But the extent of worries that the rich man has is not there with the poor man. A rich man down with diseases could buy medicines but not health. That rich man   could employ teachers, workers, buy books but can he earn knowledge? No. He can earn knowledge and wisdom only thru hard intensified study. Likewise he may buy food but cannot buy hunger.


There are millionaires in the world who are unable to digest even one meal a day. Now tell me whether there is happiness inherent in money. If food were to bring happiness the quantum of happiness one derives by eating four chapattis should be four times by eating 16 chapattis. This is because happiness should be proportionate to the quantum of food eaten. But does this happen? By eating more than that satisfies his hunger he becomes sick requiring medication. Dry, tasteless food tastes like nectar when one is hungry, whereas, nectar tastes bitter when not hungry. Similar is the position about clothes. If clothes were to cause comfort, the same cloths that are comfortable  in winter should continue to be so in summer also and vice versa. If causing comfort were to be the nature of clothes then it should cause comfort in all seasons. Why warm clothes are not suited in summer and winter clothes are not suited for winter? The nature and character of a thing should remain constant under all circumstances. For ex, to burn a thing is the nature of Fire. This nature will not undergo change. Sweetness is the quality of sugar. Eat sugar at any time. You taste sweet only. Likewise, if causing happiness is the nature of worldly things, then people would not have sought happiness even after their possession. They should be feeling happy every second. Now be clear!  Will the problem of a person running high temperature could be overcome by putting him on a soft, silky bed? Never. Hence I tell you, that happiness does not lie in the worldly things. God is the source of Happiness and that is obtained by being nearer to Him.


K: If happiness were to be within, and real joy does not rest with the worldly things, then why a person derives happiness in eating sweets? Why he does not derive happiness by eating Mud? There is joy in eating Rotis but not sand. Sugar tastes but not grass. What is the reason for this?


V:  The feeling of happiness which we derive in eating sugar candy etc is because of the character of the latter and this does not constitute real happiness. The sweetness is felt when this is concentrated in mind. Then only he experiences joy in it. If sugar candy were to cause happiness then it should cause same happiness during fever also whereas sugar tastes bitter during fever. Similar is the case of chillies. Persons not habituated to taking chillies find it as poison. So is the case of other worldly things. Now about person not finding happiness in eating mud. If mind is concentrated in it then eating mud also becomes enjoyable. We might have seen some women eating mud balls. Some animals eat sand stones also. Leave this matter aside. We find people taking liquor which is awfully smelling, astringent and bitter. Opium is highly bitter but some people consume

it. People find happiness in these things. Does joy lie in these things? No. Man derives happiness in these things as long as his mind gets concentrated in them. A question may arise as to how the mind gets concentrated in an object. When a man becomes used to a thing he starts concentrating therein albeit temporarily is the answer. Because of habit, the inherent culture or the sanskars of that object leaves a strong impression on the mind. The sanskars of a particular thing instigates a person to use them often and often. Similar is the case of beautiful scenario. Man in order to see his mind gets relaxed goes to forests, Sea, Parks, mountains etc. But when he is entangled in a criminal case he does not derive joy in these places of interest. Strikingly good places appear to be drab, worthless places for him for the reason his mind is restless resulting in lack of concentration. A person goes to a music concert, Film show etc to enjoy. But if he finds his son being sick he does enjoy the show even though present. This is because the sickness of son has disturbed him. At times when our mind is busy roaming elsewhere, we are unaware of taste of food being eaten. Hence it is clear that happiness rests with when accompanied by concentrated mind and not in objects.


K: First you said that God is a prime source of all Happiness and now you are telling that happiness lie in concentrated mind. Why this dichotomy?


V: Only in the concentrated mind the blissful God is felt. The ignorant finds that happiness lie in the external things. This is not dichotomy. What is important to be known here is, because of habit man obtains   transient concentration in worldly things. Hence transient happiness is obtained. We may ultimately realize God if we start concentrating mind in comprehensive form in worship. This is the ultimate aim of life. Precisely for this reason, praise [Stuti] prayer [Prathana] and communion [Upaasana] is necessary, the object being let mind gets concentrated and thereby derive more and more happiness.


K: What is the proof that the more the mind is concentrated, the more happiness is derived?


V: I give a proof based on state of being while in wakeful {Jagrit] state and in deep slumber [Sushupthi] state. During wakeful position man’s transactions [vrithis] are spread over towards worldly things. Hence concentration is not attained. The mind rushes to one object or the other. But in sleep condition his mind’s activities are in concentrated, restful mode, and he feels happy after a good sleep. Getting up in the morning he says that he is happy because he got a good sleep overnight. The happiness he got in sleep was due to the mind’s concentration. The soul is relieved off the connection with worldly objects and rapprochement is done with God. The soul is attached either to worldly things or with God. The more he is attached to worldly things the more sorrow he experiences. The more he cultivates relationship with God he derives more happiness. This becomes clearer from the example. A person is in jail. He is ailing. He is pained at the loss of his wife and children. He is having lot of other worries.  He is disturbed but till when? These things drag him to restlessness as long he is in wakeful state.  Once he manages to get sleep all the troubles disappear and he enjoys the same amount of happiness that a king

enjoys. Even animals enjoy happiness in sleep. This is because that in Sleep his mind’s transactions are not scattered over, but remain concentrated. Control of mind’s transactions is called “YOGA” i.e. communion with God. When an intelligent communion is established with God thru Stuti, Prarthana, and Upaasana it is said that there is spiritual elevation. This spiritual upliftment reaches its zenith thru Samadhi where Soul becomes immersed with God. This is the ultimate aim of life.


K:  Which is called Stuthi, Prathana and Upaasana?


V:  Praising the God with full devotion and faith is called Stuthi. Seeking God’s help for the removal of his foibles or weaknesses from those Godly qualities is called Prarthana. Keeping away from the worldly things that involves his pride in self called Ahankar and strongly invoking a feeling that he is nearer to God is called Upaasana.


K: You believe that God has no Form. But large number of people in the world thinks otherwise and offer prayer to the Form. What is wrong in understanding that God has a Form or having a Body?


V: You will get answer to this question tomorrow.


Vedas For Beginners : IS GOD IS THERE OR NOT?

K; Sister! You have been telling me to pray daily. I am asking you to whom we should pray? And where is that God?


V: God is everywhere. There is no place which is free from God.


K: You have told the wonderful. If god were to be everywhere then where are other things? All space  are occupied by God and if there is no place free from God then there is no place for other things. Were the other things  remaining  without a space ?


V: It is not that way sister! When it is said that there is no place free from God, it means that God is everywhere. This is my opinion and that is how it is told in a common language. God being there  is not dependent on space. It is the   physical  elements that occupy the space.

Earth, water, air, fire and their atoms, are those things that occupy space. But God pervades them all. Hence it is said that God is everywhere.


K: O.K. If God were to everywhere  why He is not seen? When  not seen, where is the proof of  his presence?


V: Are there are no objects present which are not seen? There are so many things in the world which are not seen. cold, hot,  happiness, sorrow, time, direction, hunger, thirst, itching, pain, etc are there which are not seen. There may be many reasons for a thing not to be seen.  Like far off places say, like  Europe, America etc, many things are not seen. Are we able to see the kite or a bird flying at  a far off distance? Because of closeness of proximity also, eye is not able to see a thing. There are hundred of subtle things like atoms. Some like  bacteria or virus could be seen only thru microscope. Water being covered with  algae is not seen because of algae  and like wise there are so many unseen because separated by cover.  Because of dirt, a mirror is not seen and because of presence of a wall the man sitting across the wall is also not seen. Milk and water are both liquids and because of this water in milk is not seen. If there were to be trouble in the eye many things are not seen. A man affected with jaundice cannot see white objects. Hence it is not correct to say that  things are not present  just  because they are un seen.


K:  For me, I don’t believe in anything without seeing.


V: This shows your obduracy. I have already said that there are many things which are not seen and yet   we have to believe them.  Good! Now,  are you listening to  what I am telling?


K: Yes listening.


V: By which?


K: By ears of course


V: Are you sure that what I am telling?


K: Yes. Why not?


V:Are you seeing my words thru your eyes? Okay. Look here, I am having a flower in my hands. Which is that flower?


K: It is Rose.


V: Does  the flower has a fragrance  or not?


K: Yes. It has a fragrance.


V: How did you come to  know about  this?


K:  Through my nose.


V:  Tell me one thing. Did sugar was there in the milk that  you drank overnight?


K:  Yes. It was there.


V:  How did you come to know about  it?


K: Thru My tongue.


V:  Now I point out, that the sound was perceived thru ears,  fragrance thru nose, and sugar thru tongue. Why this way? Why not did eyes perceive sound,  ears the fragrance and nose the sugar?  Even though the smell and fragrance was present why not the same was seen by eyes?


K;  The senses perceive its subjects only and grasp knowledge. God is not perceivable by any sense organs. How could we believe that He  is present at all?


V: God is not seen and therefore he is not present  was your initial argument. Now you have turned over.  You have agreed that there could be things not seen. It is separate  issue that the knowledge of such unseen things  could be had by  other sense  organs. Now, you are asking how the presence of   God could be accepted when he is not perceivable by any sense organ. If you believe that God could not  exist as He is not understood by senses, then how you understand these senses? If you believe that sense organs are understood by sense  organs only then it constitutes what is known as Atmashrya Dosha. This is because thru what is seen is not seen by itself. When their subjects are different by themselves how sense organs could understand the  sense  organs? The subject matter of eye is sight; ears sound;  nose smell; tongue taste; skin touch. Nose cannot understand the eyes nor the  tongue can understand the ears.




K:  How it cannot be  understood? When I hold mirror before me,  the eyes, ears, nose , tongue etc are forthcoming. The eyes are more forthcoming about knowledge of other organs.


V:  Sister! This is your wrong understanding. What you see from your eyes is only a form or sight not the subjects. Will you see the subjects of other sense organs in the mirror? The eyeballs can see places of  sense organs which have a form. The strength of these senses are present in that places.  Can eyes disclose  the entire knowledge about other sense organs? Eyes cannot see by itself. You are of the opinion that  eyes are seen in a mirror. Now, I put a question. Tell me  what is in my hand?


K:  Mirror.


V:  How did you see that there is a mirror in my hand?


K; Thru eyes of course.


V: When you said  that you saw mirror thru eyes , it means before seeing a mirror eyes  had a knowledge. In other words it means to say that without eyes mirror would not have seen. Now tell me, whether thru  eyes mirror is understood or vice versa?  If eyes are understood thru mirror, even when eyes are dried up, the mirror should have caused  the knowledge of the dried up eyes. When eyes are dried up , let alone causing the knowledge of eyes, mirror  cannot cause the knowledge of itself. If you think deeply, even eyes see the others with the help of other aids and not independently. It is however  true that sight cannot be seen without eyes  but the knowledge of  sight  cannot be made  by eyes themselves.


K; What other  aids are required for eyes? Eyes sees the Forms independently. The subject matter of eyes are sight. How do you say that eyes don’t see independently?


V: Yes.  Now I am seeing all objects. But  if there  is a thick darkness surrounding can I see things?


K:  No, It cannot be seen.


V: Hence it is clear that eyes are not just enough to see. It requires light. If there were to be no light  eyes are helpless. And even if both light and eyes were to remain present  and the object is not stationary then also we cannot see. If you place the book too close to your eyes you cannot read. Similarly also we cannot read letters in a book held at a distance. Therefore to read letters  book is to be held at a definite distance and place. Further, even the object at a place and light were to be there and  if eyes were removed from the mind, in that event also we cannot see. There are many occasions where mind is involved in some work, the objects are not seen by the eyes even though they  may pass thru our front. In such circumstances, if you were to ask a person whether he observed certain things he would say “ no, I did not watch”. Now you would have understood what are the aids that are required to see a particular object.


K:  What do you mean by all this?


V: Have you not understood as yet?  If you cannot perceive God thru sense organs, you cannot understand sense organs thru sense organs. But even then we have to accept the sense organs. Then why doubt about  the  acceptance of existence of God.


K: How we can understand the senses?


V: Sense organs are understood by the Soul thru experience. When he perceives sound, smell, Form,etc he understands  “ That there are aids within me and I am getting the benefit thru them”


K: And how we could understand the God?


V: God could be understood by experience.


K: How the experience is got?


V: God is felt thru Soul.


K: When  this feeling is felt?


V: When mind is got rid of three faults.


K: What are these faults?


V:  Mala,  Vikshepa, and Avarana


K: What are its characteristics?


V: The thinking of doing bad to others and  the effects of  Sins fallen on Soul [sanskars] is called Mala.  Constantly thinking over  the worldly objects[materialism] and lack of firmness in mind is referred to as Vikshepa. The impact formed on mind about the pride of temporary worldly things is referred to as Avarana.


K: How can we overcome the above three faults?


V:  There are three ways thru which we can overcome these three hurdles.


K: What are they?


V: Knowledge, [Jnana]  Action[Karma] and Communion [ Upaasana]


K: What you mean by Knowledge, Action and worship?


V:  Understanding the matter as it is,  i.e. to treat inert matter  as inert[Jada] Conscious entities [ Chetan] as Conscious[Chetan] and transitory things  as transitory  things marks the  Knowledge.  To work for the welfare of  Soul, Body and  Society and to try for the acquisition of ennobling things  is referred to as Action. To approach  a material  and  overcoming his shortcomings based on the strength of that  material   is referred to as Communion.  Consider for a while, that  a person is down with cold. If he approaches water for the removal of cold it betrays  his ignorance, not knowledge. If he is aware of fire and  tries to obtain fire thru Action and approaches fire for the removal of cold then  only he gets rid of cold. From Knowledge, the Mala is overcome, from Action, Vikshepa, is got rid of and finally thru Communion  the effect of Avarana is kept away. Then only God is felt.


K: Make this point more clear. How the faults of Mala, Vikshepa, and Avarana are removed respectively by Knowledge, Action, andCommunion respectively?


V: With the help of  Knowledge, it should be understood that all worldly things, all living beings are not permanent. For this reason, not entertaining the  feeling of  snatching away  the rights of others is a step in the direction of removal of evil  of Mala. By  thinking that worldly things are the end all and be all  and appropriating them with that spirit  would cause infirmity of mind  or Vikshepa. It is true that materials in the world are means to an end. But they are not end by themselves nor they could be life ideals. According to this principle, the action of man should be dispassionate, like a lotus in a water pond. This is type of  Karma which drives away Vikshepa. Looking upon the God gifted things as something his own is the thing that makes a deep imprint on the mind of man and this prompts him to treat money, women, land as his own which   causes self-pride and this cast spell over his  mind. Further with the strength of these material possessions  he starts tormenting  the others. He thinks there are no superior to him. But instead, when  he does Action with full Knowledge then he withdraws all forces inside  and with concentration thinks that “ God is with me and I am with God” in his heart  then he gets away from the evil ofAvarana. Hence by constant efforts and resorting to Knowledge, Action and Communion he is able to drive away the three evils Mala, Vikshepa and Avarana. Then only he can the feel the presence of God.


K; Sister, you are very clever and good at logic. Now tell me why God is necessary to this world at all?


V: Why God is  necessary to the world? Very good question. If God were not to be there then how is the world is created?. Who can create Sun, Moon, mountains, rivers, Air, water, ether, stars, forests, Trees, fruits, Milk, honey animals, birds, water creatures, snakes, etc. Who else can create these things and species?


K: Why God is necessary for the creation of these things? They are self-formed and has been there always.


V: If  things in the world could form themselves without the help of creator, then food should  have there without a cook, pot without a potter, ornaments without a goldsmith, sweet without sweet maker, dress without a tailor etc.  Secondly any thing in the world does not remain permanently. Every thing in the world has a origin, growth, decay, and ultimately destruction. All big to very big things have been created and gets destroyed in the end..


K:  I don’t see that God creates things. It does not appear as such. All things are formed by themselves and this order is there from time immemorial. Earth, water, Air, Fire, and their atoms are in existence in the world. These elements keep on joining  themselves in the creation of new and newer things and getting destroyed separately. Where is the work of God involved  here?


V:  Your opinion does not stand  to facts. The Earth and the other elements  and their atoms are inert matters. They don’t join themselves without joining them and do not disintegrate without getting disintegrated. Joining and Unjoining  are mutually hostile qualities. These qualities do not stay together. There may any number of qualities in a matter but not mutually  hostile qualities. If the nature of a thing  is to associate they keep on associating. and on the other hand disintegrating is their quality they keep on disintegrating. They do not join with mutually hostile qualities. If you were to say that joining and disintegrating  are the nature of a matter,  those qualities which are  predominant will have a say over the other. For ex, if joining is the  predominant quality, it never allows the world to disintegrate. If disintegrating is the nature of a matter and remains predominant it never allows the world  to stay together. If both qualities are held to be  equal then no object can be formed in the world. But we are seeing where an object is formed, remains for a while and gets destroyed. You may imagine any number of qualities in physical matters, but without God, Creation, sustenance, and dissolution is not possible in the matter called Prakrithi. There is difference in Conscious[ Chetan] and Non-Conscious[ Jada}forces. The Non-Conscious cannot do anything on their own. It keeps working with the help of Conscious forces only. The Conscious being  is capable of doing, not doing or undoing anything. This is the natural qualities of  Conscious beings.


K: The person who creates a thing in the world is directly  visible. The goldsmith, potter, the sweet maker,  the bird which builds the nests are  all seen. If God were to be creator of this world he would have been visible.


V: Believe me. The maker in the world is not at all visible. It is totally false to say that the goldsmith, Sweet maker, potter are visible. You may ask how? Listen. People like Potter, Goldsmith etc are creators who are made of twin elements, Body and Soul, The body to a soul is an instrument to do a function. Only when soul uses the  instrument called body a material  is formed. Without the instrument called body a material cannot come off. The goldsmith, potter etc are  physical bodies which are visible and are made of five elements called earth, water, fire, air and sky. But the soul who makes use of this body is not at all visible. The body without the soul cannot create things. Likewise without body, a soul cannot do anything either. His strength is of limited character. Hence God grants him a body which is visible. But God is of  limitless potentialities, omnipresent and omniscient. He does things without a body. The soul is also a creator like God, albeit with a limited strength and abilities . God is a creator of all. Both God and Soul  are not visible.


K: If God  is without Body then how is that  He can create the world. No function is ever possible without an instrument called  body.


V: Now the time is over. Tomorrow morning answer to this question will be given.


K: Okay. Let it be on tomorrow.

Note : This is the the translated version of the original  ” Do bahinonke bathe” written by  late Siddagopal “kaviratna”.

Translated by Vasudev Rao.

The origin of the Vedas: Dr. Vidhu Mayor

Veda 1

The idea that ‘the Rig Veda is the oldest book of mankind’ was first stated by Max Muller in the late 19th century.  Sadly, such statements have since been accepted uncritically, even within some Arya Samaj circles. It is sad because this contradicts the age-old theist Indian conviction that all four of the Vedas were revealed to mankind when humans were first created by God.  Each one of the four ‘books’ were revealed to four different humans.

The founder of the Arya Samaj movement, Svami Dayanand Sarsavati, expounds on the origin of the Vedas in his book Rigvedadibhashyabhumika, at the beginning of which he explains that God did not, however, produce the Vedas in the form of books in the beginning, but that ‘He revealed them to the consciousness of Agni, Vayu, Aditya and Angirasa’.  Amongst the first humans, these were four rishis of such great merit that they were the most worthy of this honour. The author further cites the Shatapatha Brahamana XI. 5-8-3: that from them, when they meditated, were produced the three Vedas, viz., from Agni was produced the Rigveda, from Vayu, the Yajurveda, and from Surya the Samaveda. God inspired their consciousness and produced the Vedas through them….God gave them knowledge in the shape of the Vedas. Dayanand stresses this point to emphasize that these four did not compose the Vedas; he further writes:

The Samhitas are called Veda because all men know all true sciences in or through them, or because all true sciences exist in them, or because all true sciences exist in them, or because men become learned by studying them. The Samhitas are called
‘Shruti’ because from the beginning of creation to the present day Brahma and others have heard all true sciences read out of them. The Vedas, having been revealed by God who has no bodily organs, were never composed by a being having a corporeal body. God used Agni, Vayu, Aditya and Angirasa as His instruments only for revealing the Vedas….The Vedas are not the products of their minds. God, being possessed of perfect knowledge, the relations between the Vedic words and their meanings also were established by Him.

Dayanand then goes on to rationalise his assertion that this act of revelation took place over 1.96 billion years ago.  So, in this sense it would be partially true to say that ‘the Rig Veda is the oldest book of mankind’.  Two errors in this statement, however, are that (i) it suggests that the Rig preceded the other three Vedas which – as has been explained above – is not true, for all four Vedas were revealed simultaneously and (ii) the false notion that these four samhitas began life in the form of ‘books’ of paper with ink-pen writing.  Obviously, at some point in history later on, this knowledge was written down into the form of books instead of it remaining solely imprinted in the memories of humans with unimaginably powerful intellects (even today wecan find men in India who are able to recite all 20000 mantras of the Vedas orally).

A third error implicit in Max Muller’s contention is that these books were written a few thousand years ago during the so-called Vedic era of India’s history. The case for debunking this as a myth now follows.

Textbooks of history used in schools in India even today teach that the people of India originate, racially, from an invasion of ‘Aryans’ into India over 3500 years ago – this version of history being a legacy left behind by the British rule over India for over two centuries.  The evidence for this theory is based mainly on the work done by European archaeologists and linguists during the time of Britain’s domination of India as its colony. The theory of Indo-Aryan migration was proposed in mid-19th century by German linguist and Sanskrit scholar Max Muller who proposed that these invaders introduced the ‘Indo-European languages’ and the caste system into India.

It is admittedly biased to summarily and contemptuously dismiss, here, these theories (which are predicated on proffering fossils of chariot technology as evidence, amongst other, of such an invasion) as being totally false. However, an author as eminent as GK Chesterton penned the following indictment of archaeology not being an exact science: the case in the 1920’s in the USA when the finding of a fossilised tooth was heralded – with much media excitement – as more proof that man had descended from apes because the tooth had characteristics of both man and ape.  However, in 1927 other parts of the skeleton were found – to reveal that this tooth was not that of `Nebraska Man’ but that of a pig!

Max Muller’s work will be critiqued later.  Firstly, however, Svami Dayanand’s powerful objection in his 1883 book ‘Light of Truth’ must be reiterated: In no Sanskrit book – historical or otherwise – is it recorded that the Aryas emigrated here from Iran, fought with and conquered the aborigines, drove them out, and became the rulers of the country. How can then these statements of the foreigners be true?  Why, indeed, did the Aryan invaders go to such lengths as to conceal or destroy all evidence of their origin in Central Asia? An analogy would be of there being, in three thousand years time, no surviving documentary evidence whatsoever, of the people of America today having emigrated there from Europe, in both those continents! Further, such a scenario would also require no evidence to survive of the virtual genocide of the indigenous American Indians by the European invaders. Why has no evidence emanated from Central Asian countries such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan of such a migration?  Would one not expect them to present such evidence – of their exporting to India of its rich Vedic civilisation – with justifiable nationalistic pride?

Modern – Western – historians are notably silent in addressing or rebutting these objections; this silence is positively deafening in light of the allegations, by the likes of De Riencourt, of disingenuity on Dayanand’s part. Two discrepancies that become clear are (i) why is there such an enormous difference in the interpretation of the Rig Veda between today’s historians and Dayanand and (ii) why are there similar differences in the account of Indian history by Dayanand, an Indian, and the version – accepted as true today – proposed by ‘visiting’ western historians and archaeologists?

A brief digression is warranted here. The explanation offered by the Occident for the paucity of historical documents to be found in India is that, somehow, a peculiar characteristic of the Indian psyche is to have no need or interest in history!  Max Muller was not the first German to suggest this. One far more eminent, none other than the great German philosopher Hegel, remarked: ‘Its strikes everyone in beginning to form an acquaintance with the treasures of Indian literature, that a land so rich in intellectual products and those of the profoundest order of thought, has no History; and in this respect contrasts most strongly with China….’ [The fascinating fascination that Germany discovered for India 200 years ago is another story that Indians of today must reflect upon].  Amaury de Riencourt, in his 1960 book The Soul of India further develops this – quite preposterous – notion as elaborated on page 9 of that book – ‘With the arrival of the Aryan war bands, all historical evidence vanishes; script disappeared, and the wooden structures of the Aryans rotted away in time without leaving any traces. From the very first, the invaders manifested the most remarkable trait of Indian psychology: a complete, instinctive indifference to history and the preservation of historical records. The Aryans in India had no memory.  And instead of historical treatises such as the Chinese have left to posterity , the Aryans left us myths – the transmutation of time-bound historical events into timeless tales in which fact and fancy are almost inextricably mixed.’

So, there we have it: Indians not only have a peculiarity in their make-up that precludes them from having a penchant for their own – or anyone else’s – history but are also asked to accept that it is necessary for foreigners to teach it to them.

Why, then, did Svami Dayanand devote well over a hundred pages in Chapter XI of the Light of Truth, a book primarily devoted Vedic theology and philosophy, to an examination of the history of India?  Why were as many as six of the 50-odd lectures he delivered in Pune in 1875 devoted to history? One of these began: ‘Today’s topic is history.  I shall talk about history in an orderly sequence.  Itihaasa means itihaaso naama vrittam, that is, it is a narration of past events. It started since the creation and it continues today.’  What were the sources he used – or is it inferred that a man revered for his colossal integrity fabricated his version?

De Riencourt finds it necessary to disparage Dayanand’s book as a ‘bird’s-eye view of world history’ and describes his interpretation of the Vedas as ‘his narrow-minded superficial metaphysics’.  Not mentioned at all is Dayanand’s simple explanation as to why the historical records in India have been decimated, that is, that they were destroyed by successive hostile ‘colonisers’ of India over a period of two millenia – beginning with the Buddhists and ending with the Islamic Mughals (and as is well-known today the British also seized literary records, amongst other things).

In debating which translation (Dayanand’s or Max Muller’s) of the Vedas should be believed, the starting point is that the Western world – and thus Indian text-books of history – accepts Max Muller’s contention that the compilation of the Vedas was started during the invasion of India by the Aryans circa 1500 BC and that their hymns, in the words of De Riencourt, ‘undoubtedly reflect the feelings of victorious and warlike barbarians.’

Dayanand translated (i) Rig Veda’s mantra 5:82.5 (Aum vishvaani deva savitur….) and (ii) God’s injunction in Rigveda 8-49-2 as follows:

(i)                  O, Omnipresent and benevolent Creator, disabuse us of our vices.  Secure in us that which is for our betterment [God, O all-pervading kindest Creator, take away our evils (and) inculcate goodness in us].

(ii)                 Acquire duly the Dharma preached by me, which is quintessentially devoid of bias and partiality, and is truthful by definition.

Come together to give up all conflict, so that the best of your happiness may increase and all suffering may be destroyed.

Having met together, hold discussions; ask questions and answer them, lovingly.  Avoid perverse reasoning such as sophistry, prejudiced and untrue arguments, so that noble qualities and true knowledge may forever increase amongst you.

Acquire wisdom to enable your minds to become replete with knowledge and always be filled with joy. Always follow Dharma and never practice Adharma. You should follow the same Dharma as has always been followed by learned, wise and impartial men -whether of past times or of the present age, that is, whether dead or living – maintaining a love for the preaching of the Divine Dharma.

They worshipped me as the Almighty and adorable God and followed the Dharma laid down by me. You also must do the same, so that you may know the Dharma inculcated by the Vedas and have no doubts about it.

Can these examples, indeed, be the work of Aryan savages?  Is the quality of this wisdom not, at least, on a par with the highest echelons of European metaphysics? Alternatively, is it not far more plausible that  Dayanand was correct in, echoing the message of India’s great ancient sages such as Patanjli, that God revealed the Vedas to the first humans He created?

An affirmative answer to that question, that is that the Vedas are of Divine Authorship and not the work of Aryan ‘bards’ imagined by the European colonist-missionary axis of the 18th and 19th centuries ,requires the presentation of further evidence to expose the notion of an Aryan invasion of India as being a fiction.


Vidhu Mayor, August 2014, Birmingham, UK.

वर्तमान युग में वेदों की प्रासंगिकता : शिवदेव आर्य, पौन्धा, देहरादून



परमपिता परमेश्वर ने जब सृष्टि का निर्माण किया तब सृष्टि में अनेकविध जड़-चेतनों का निर्माण किया। इन नाना विध जड़-चेतनों में यदि कोई सर्वश्रेष्ठ है तो वह है मनुष्य। जैसे परमात्मा ने अपनी सर्वोत्तम कृति मनुष्य को बनाया है ठीक वैसे ही मनुष्यों ने भी अपनी सर्वश्रेष्ठ रचना के रुप में संसार का निर्माण किया है। इसीलिए मनुष्य को सामाजिक प्राणी कहा जाता है। मनुष्य ने जिस प्रकार के नियम और व्यवस्था की है उसे देखकर ऐसा प्रतीत होता  हैै कि उसने पूर्णरुप से परमात्मा की नकल की है क्योंकि परमेश्वर अपने द्वारा निर्मित सृष्टि के नियमों के सदैव अनुकुल रहता है वैसे ही मनुष्य अपने द्वारा निर्मित समाज के नियमों में बंधा हुआ होता है। इस प्रकार हम इसके मूल को खोजे  तो हमें ज्ञात होता है कि अनुशासन में इसकी बहुत महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका है। परमेश्वर अपने द्वारा निर्मित सृष्टि नियमों के सर्वदानुकुल रहता है। क्योंकि परमेश्वर अपने आपमें अनुशासित होता है। यदि परमेश्वर अनुशासित नहीं होता तो प्रतिदिन प्रलय और निर्माण करता रहता। वह १४ मनवन्तरों के इतने लम्बे समय की प्रतीक्षा नहीं करता। जिस समय जो चाहता वहीं करता। इसी अनुशासन को हम जड़-चेतन दोनों में ही देख सकते हैं। जड़रुपी सूर्य यदि अनुशासन के अन्दर नहीं होता तो वह अपनी इच्छा से निकलता और डूबता, परन्तु ऐसा नहीं है।

इसीलिए अनुशासन की नितान्त अनिवार्यता है। इसी कारण अनुशासन के अभाव में अव्यवस्था न फैल जाये । इस प्रकार सोचकर परमपिता परमेश्वर ने सृष्टि के आदि में चार सर्वश्रेष्ठ आत्माओं को वेद का ज्ञान दिया। इस वेद के ज्ञान से सम्पूर्ण प्राणी मात्र अनुशासन सहित अनेक विध ज्ञान-विज्ञान को प्राप्त करे व करावें और धर्म-अर्थ-काम और मोक्ष को प्राप्त होवे।

पशुओं को अपने जन्म के पश्चात् माँ के स्तनपान करना सीखना नहीं पड़ता। पशुओं में जन्म से ही तैरने का गुण विद्यमान होता है। पशुओं की संवेदन शक्ति बहुत तीव्र होती है। इस बात को वैज्ञानिक लोग भी स्वीकार करते हैं। इसीलिए तो जब कोई मन्त्री या नेता आदि लोग आते हैं  उनके सेवक गण गुप्त स्फोटक पदार्थों को ढूढ़ने के लिए मशीन के साथ-साथ कुत्तों को भी लेकर आते हैं। इसप्रकार हम कह सकते है कि पशु जन्म से ही पूर्ण है। वो भोगों को भोगने के लिए इस सृष्टि पर आये हैं न कि कर्म करने के लिए। इसीलिए पशुओं को भोगयोनि की श्रेणी में रखा जाता है। अतः परमेश्वर ने वेदों का ज्ञान प्राणीमात्र के लिए प्रदान किया है।

सृष्टि के आदि में परमेश्वर ने चार सर्वश्रेष्ठ आत्माओं को वेद का ज्ञान दिया। ऋग्वेद का ज्ञान अग्नि ऋषि को, यजुर्वेद का ज्ञान वायु ऋषि को, सामवेद का ज्ञान आदित्य ऋषि को, अथर्ववेद का ज्ञान अंगिरा को प्रदान किया। इन्हीं ऋषिओं की परम्परा से वेदों का शुध्द ज्ञान आज हम को प्राप्त हो रहा है। इन चारों वेदों में प्रत्येक विषय का ज्ञान है। पुनरपि मुख्य रुप से ज्ञान, कर्म और उपासना ये तीन वेदों के विषय हैं।

माता-पिता जिस प्रकार अपनी सन्तान को कार्य करने के लिए सुख, सुविधा के लिए उसकी आवश्यकताओं  की पूर्ति करते हैं वैसे ही संसार के लोगों के लिए उस  परमेश्वर ने आवश्यक वस्तु वेद को मानव समाज को दिया। इन वेदों में वो सम्पूर्ण सामग्री है जिसे पाकर मनुष्य सुख-शान्ति व समृध्दि को पा कर अत्यन्त परमधाम मोक्ष को प्राप्त कर सकता है।

जब हमारा जन्म होता है तब हमारी माता जी हमें बताती हैं कि अमुक व्यक्ति तुम्हारा भाई हैं, पिता हैं इत्यादि। जितना माता अपने  बच्चों से प्यार करती है, उतना और कोई कदापि नहीं कर सकता।

वेदों को भी इसीलिए वेदमाता प्रचोदयन्ताम्…..मन्त्र से माता के नाम से सम्बोधित किया जाता है। क्योंकि वेदमाता परमपिता परमेश्वर के विषय में जितना बता सकती है, उतना और दूसरा कोई नहीं बता सकता  इसलिए परमपिता परमेश्वर को अच्छी प्रकार से जानने के लिए वेद को जानना और मानना नितान्त अनिवार्य है। मानव समाज के लिए वेद की भूमिका में सबसे महत्वपूर्ण बात है आस्तिक बनना। जब व्यक्ति आस्तिक हो जायेगा तो समाज अत्यधिक उन्नति करेगा। आस्तिकता के आते ही मनुष्य अनुशासित हो जाता है। अनुशासन के अन्तर्गत ही मनुष्य नियम पूर्वक कार्य करने लगता है। आस्तिक होने का सीधा-साफ अर्थ है-परमेश्वर को सर्वव्यापक मानना। इसी से मनुष्य जब भी कोई कार्य करता है तब यही महसुस करता है कि उसे परमेश्वर देख रहा है। परन्तु वर्तमान समय में अनुशासन नहीं हैं, इसका कारण है कि हम आस्तिक नहीं है, वेद को नहीं मानते  (नास्तिको वेद निन्दकः)

इसी अनुशासन के आभाव में दुराचार, व्यभिचार, भ्रष्टाचार व्याप्त हो रहा है। इन सब समस्याओं से छुटकारा पाने के लिए हमें वेद की शरण में जाना पडे़गा। वेदों की महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका मनुष्य की आवश्यकताओं को पूर्ण करने में है। प्रत्येक मनुष्य चाहता है कि – मेरा घर परिवार सुखी हो, समृध्दि से भरा हो, पुत्र आज्ञाकारी हो, पत्नी मधुरभाषी हो। इन्हीं बातों को वेद में इसप्रकार व्यक्त किया गया है –

अनुव्रतः पितुः पुत्रो मात्रा भवतु संमनाः।

जाया पत्ये मधुमतीं वाचं वदतु शान्तिवान् ।।

                                                    ( अथर्व.-३/३॰/२)

अर्थात् पुत्र पिता का अनुव्रती होवे अर्थात् पिता के व्रतों को पूर्ण करने वाला हो। पुत्र माता के साथ उत्तम मन वाला हो अर्थात् माता के मन को संतुष्ट करने वाला हो। पत्नी पति के साथ मधुर एवं शान्ति युक्त बोले। इसी बात को चाणक्य ने लिखा है कि –

यस्य पुत्रो वशीभूतो भार्या छन्दानुगामिनी।

विभवे यश्च संतुष्टस्तस्य स्वर्गम् इहैवहि


मनुष्य को सुखी रखने के लिए चाणक्य जी कहते हैं कि-

ते पुत्रा ये पितुर्भक्ता स पिता यस्तु पोषकः।

तन्मित्रं यस्य विश्वासः सा भार्या यत्र निवृत्तिः।।

पुत्र वही है जो पिता का भक्त हो और पिता  का भक्त हो और पिता वही जो पुत्र का पालन पोषण करता हो, मित्र वही जिस पर विश्वास किया जाये और पत्नी वही है जिससे सुख प्राप्त किया जाए।

इस प्रकार वेद तथा ऋषिग्रन्थ यही बताते हैं कि सुखी जीवन के लिए परिवार में परस्पर उत्तरदायित्व तथा सहयोग की भावना बनी रहे।

मानव समाज को व्यवस्थित रखने के लिए लोगों के कार्य भी व्यवस्थित होने चाहिए। इसीलिए वेद में कहा गया है-

ब्राह्मणोऽस्यमुखमासीद् बाहूः राजन्यः कृतः।

उरु तदस्य यद् वैश्यः पद्भ्यां शूद्रो अजायत्

इस मन्त्र से सिध्द होता है कि सम्पूर्ण संसार के मनुष्यों को कर्म के आधार पर चार भागों में बाँटा गया है।

ब्राह्मण: वेद आदि शास्त्रों का अध्ययन-अध्यापन करना-कराना, यज्ञ करना-कराना, दान लेना तथा देना करना कर्मों को करना ब्राह्मणों का परम कर्तव्य है;-

अध्यापनमध्यनं यजनं याजनं तथा।

दानं प्रतिगृह´चैव ब्रह्मणनामकल्पमत्।। (मनु.-१/८८)

क्षत्रिय: प्रजा का रक्षण, दान देना, यज्ञ करना, वेदाध्ययन करना एवं विषयों में आसक्त न होना आदि कर्मों को करना क्षत्रियों का परम कर्तव्य है।।

प्रजानां रक्षणं दानमिज्याऽध्ययनमेव च।

विषयेष्वप्रशक्ति क्षत्रियस्य समासतः।। (मनु.-१/८९)

वैश्य: पशुओं का रक्षण, दान देना, यज्ञ करना, वेदाध्ययन करना, वाणिज्य-व्यापार आदि कर्मों को करना वैश्यों का परम कर्तव्य है।

पशूनां रक्षणं दानमिज्याध्ययनमेव च।

वाणिक्पथं कुसीदं च वैश्यस्य कृषिमेव च।। (मनु.-१/९॰)

शुद्र: उपर्युक्त तीनों वर्णों की सेवा शुश्रूषा करना शूद्रों के कर्म हैं।

एकमेव तु शुद्रस्य प्रभुः कर्म समादिशत्।

एतेषामेव वर्णानां शुश्रूषामनसूयया।। (मनु.-१/९१)

इस प्रकार की वर्ण व्यवस्था समाज में होने से सुख-शान्ति का माहौल बना रहता है।

मनुष्य ही एक ऐसा प्राणी है जो कर्म योनी के अन्तर्गत आता है। मनुष्यों को कार्य करने की स्वतन्त्रता है परन्तु फल भोगने की स्वतन्त्रता नहीं है। जैसे योगेश्वर श्रीकृष्ण जी कहते हैं कि-

      कर्मण्यवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन।

      मा कर्मफल हेतुर्भूमा ते संगोस्त्वकर्मणि।।

मनुष्य कर्म करने में सर्वदा स्वतन्त्र है परन्तु फल भोगने में परतन्त्र है। इसीलिए उसे सत्य-असत्य, धर्म-अधर्म का ज्ञान होना चाहिए क्योंकि इन्हीं कर्मों के अनुसार मनुष्यों को फल मिलता है। अच्छे बुरे कर्मों की पहचान के लिए कहा गया है कि आत्मनः प्रतिकूलानि परेषां न समाचरेत्’ अर्थात् स्वयं को जो व्यवहार अच्छा न लगे, उसे अन्यों के साथ कदापि नहीं करना चाहिए। हमारी आत्मा सही गलत का सही निर्णायक है। इसीलिए जब अपनी आत्मा को कोई कार्य अच्छा न लगता हो भला वह कार्य दूसरों के लिए कैसे हितकर हो सकता है? ऐसी विचारधारा के होने से हम गलत कार्यों के करने से रुक जायेंगे।

मनुष्य का सदाचारी होना बहुत जरुरी है। सदाचारी मनुष्य ही समाज में सुखी रह सकता है और दूसरों को सुख दे सकता है। वर्तमान समाज में सदाचार की नितान्त अनिवार्यता है। इसके लिए वेद हमें उपदेश देते हुए कहता है कि-

सप्त मर्यादाः कवयस्ततक्षुस्तासामेकामिदभ्यं हुरो गात्।

आयोर्ह स्कम्भ उपमस्य नीतो पथां विसर्गे धरुणेषु तस्थौ।। (ऋग्वेद-१॰/५/६)

अर्थात् हिंसा, चोरी, व्यभिचार, मद्यपान, जुआ, असत्य भाषण और इन पापों के करने वालों दुष्टों का सहयोग करने का नाम सप्त मर्यादा है। इनमें से जो एक भी मर्यादा का उल्लंघन करता है अर्थात् एक भी पाप करता है, वह पापी होता है और जो धैर्य से इन हिंसादि पापों को छोड़  देता है, वह निस्संदेह जीवन का स्तम्भ ;आदर्शद्ध होता है और मोक्षभागी होता है।

उलूकयातुं शुशुलूकयातुं जाहि श्वयातुमुत कोकयातुम्।

सुपर्णयातुमुत गृध्रयातुं दृषदेव प्र मृण रक्ष इन्द्र।। (ऋग्वेद-७/१॰४/२२)

अर्थात् गरुड़ के समान मद (घमंड), गीध के समान लोभ, कोक के समान काम, कुत्ते के समान मत्सर, उलूक के समान मोह (मूर्खता) और भेडि़या के समान क्रोध को मार भगाना अर्थात् काम, लोभ, मोह, मद, मत्सर आदि छह विकारों को अपने अन्तःकरण से हटा दो।

आज संसार में सत्यता का अभाव है इसी लिए कहा जाता है कि – सत्यं ब्रूयात् प्रियं ब्रूयात्………’ सत्य बोलने के साथ-साथ मधुर भाषण होना चाहिए। अतः कहा गहा है कि-

जिह्नाया अग्रे मधु मे जिह्नामूले मधूलकम्।

     ममेदह क्रतावसो मम चित्तमुपायसि।।   

     मधुमन्मे निक्रमणं मधुमन्मे परायणम्।

     वाचा वदामि मधुमद् भूयासं मधु संदृशः।।        (अथर्ववेद-१/३४/२-३)

अर्थात् मेरी जिह्ना के अग्रभाग में मधुरता हो और जिह्ना के मूल में मधुरता हो। हे मधुरता! मेरे कर्म में तेरा वास हो और मेरे मन के अन्दर भी तू पहुँच जा। मेरा आना-जाना मधुर हो, मैं स्वयं मधुर मूर्ति बन जाऊॅ।

हमारी किसी भी इन्द्रिय से अभद्र, असभ्य व्यवहार न होवे इसके लिए वेद बारम्बार आदेश देता है –

भद्रं कर्णेभिः शृणुयाम देवा भद्रं पश्येमाक्षभिर्यजत्राः।

स्थिरैरंगैस्तुष्टुवां सस्तनूभिव्र्यशेमहि देवहितं यदायुः।। (यजुर्वेद-२५/२१)

समाज में शराब पीना व जुआ खेलना एक शौक हो गया है। इन कृत्यों से समाज का निरन्तर पतन ही हो रहा है। एतदर्थ इनकी रोकथाम के लिए वेद कहता है कि –

हत्सु पीतासे युध्यन्त दुर्मदासो न सुशयाम्। ऊधर्न नग्ना जरन्ते।।

अर्थात् दिल खोलकर शराब पीने वाले दुष्ट लोग आपस में लड़ते हैं और नंगे होकर व्यर्थ बड़बड़ाते हैं, इसीलिए शराब कदापि नहीं पीनी चाहिए।

जिसप्रकार शराब पीना बुरा है, उसी प्रकार जुआ खेलना भी बुरा है। वेद उपदेश देता है:-

जाया तप्यते कितवस्य हीना माता पुत्रस्य चरतः क्वस्वित्। 

ऋणावा विभ्यध्दनमिच्छमानोऽन्येषामस्तमुप नक्तमेति।।

अर्थात् जुआरी की स्त्री कष्टमय अवस्था के कारण दुःखी रहती है, गली-गली मारे-मारे फिरने वाले जुआरी की माता रोती रहती है,  कर्जे से लदा हुआ जुआरी स्वयं सदा डरता रहता है और धन की इच्छा से वह रात के समय दूसरों के घरों में चोरी करने के लिए पहुँचना है, इसलिए जुआ खेलना अत्यन्त बुरा है।

इसी प्रकार चोरी को भी बुरा बतलाया गया है। अतः अथर्ववेद में कहा गया है कि-

येऽमावास्यां रात्रिमुदस्थुव्र्राजमत्रिणः।

अग्निस्तुरीयो यातुहा सो अस्मभ्यमधि ब्रवत्।।

अर्थात् जो मुफ्तखोरे, भूखे और भटकने वाले रात्री में बस्ती के भीतर चोरी करने और डाका डालने के लिए आते हैं, उनसे बचने के लिए राजपुरुष सबको सचेत करता है और उन्हें पकड़कर मार डालता है। इसीलिए कभी भी किसी की चोरी नहीं करनी चाहिए।

वास्तव में यह सत्य प्रतीत होता है कि हम यदि वेद के द्वारा निर्दिष्ट मार्गों का अनुसरण करने तो निश्चित ही आज समाज में फैली बुराईयाँ समाप्त हो जायेंगी। इसीलिए हम सबको वेदों की प्रासंगिता को समझते हुए संगच्छध्वं संवदध्वम्’ की भावना से ओत-प्रोत होते हुए वेद के द्वारा दिखाये गये मार्ग का अनुसरण करना चाहिए।

वेदों की श्रेष्ठता के बारे में श्री अटलबिहारी वाजपेयी जी कहते हैं कि-

वेद-वेद के मन्त्र मन्त्र में,

                मन्त्र मन्त्र की पंक्ति-पक्ति में।

                पंक्ति-पंक्ति के अक्षर स्वर में,

                दिव्य ज्ञान आलोक प्रदीप्त।।

आर्यों! वेदनिधि को पहचान कर स्वयं को वेदानुकुल बनावें और दूसरों को भी वेद मार्ग का अनुसरण करने का उपदेश देवें।


– श्रीमद् दयानन्दार्ष-ज्योतिर्मठ-गुरुकुल,

दून-वाटिका-२, पौन्धा, देहरादून

Making of Bharat According to Vedas By Subodh Kumar

AEL Maurya

Bharat varsh according to Vedas.

वेदों के अनुसार भारत देश.
राजा द्वारा भारत देश निर्माण
गौ ,शिक्षा और राजा के आचरण, इन तीन का राष्ट्र निर्माण मे महत्व
Making of Bharat Desh RV5.27

ऋषि:- त्रैवृष्ण्याष्ययरुण:,पौरुकुत्सस्त्रसदस्यु:, भारतोश्वमेधश्च राजान: ।
अग्नि:, 6 इन्द्राग्नी। त्रिष्टुप्, 4-6 अनुष्टुप्।
ऋषि: = 1. त्रैवृष्णा:= जिस के उपदेश तीनों मन शरीर व आत्मा के सुखों को शक्तिशाली बनाते हैं
2. त्र्यरुण:= वह तीन जो मन शरीर व आत्मा के सुखों को प्राप्त कराते हैं
3.पौरुकुत्स त्रसदस्य: = जो राजा सज्जनों का पालक व तीन (दुराचारी,भ्रष्ट , समाज द्रोही)
दस्युओं को दूर करने वाला
4. राजान भारतो अश्वमेध: ;
भारतो राजान: – राजा जो स्वयं की यज्ञमय आदर्श जीवनशैलि से प्रजा को भी यज्ञीय
मनोवृत्ति वाला बना कर राष्ट्र का उत्तम भरण करता है .
अश्वमेध: – अश्व- ऊर्जा और मेधा- यथा योग्य मनन युक्त आत्म ज्ञान को धारण करने वाली
परम बुद्धि

इन्द्राग्नी = इन्द्राग्नि: = उत्साह और ऊर्जा से पूर्ण सदैव अपने लक्ष्य को प्राप्त करने मे विजयी व्यक्ति Have fire in their belly to be ultimate Doers

COWS’ role in Vision for Bharat varsh Nation

1. अनस्वन्ता सत्पतिर्मामहे मे गावा चेतिष्ठो असुरो मघोन: ।
त्रैवृष्णो अग्ने दशभि: सहस्रैर्वैश्वानर ष्ययरुणश्चिकेत ।।RV5.27.1
(गावा चेतिष्ठ:) गौओं से प्राप्त उत्तम चेतना द्वारा (सत्पति: ) सज्जनों के पालन के लिए भूत काल की उपलब्धियों के अनुभव के आधार पर वर्तमान और भविष्य के लिए (तीनों काल )(त्रैवृष्ण:)में शरीर, मन, बुद्धि तीनों को शक्तिशाली बनाने वाली (असुरो मघोन:) ऐश्वर्यशाली प्राण ( जीवन शैलि ) को (त्र्यरुण:) शरीर , मन और बुद्धि के लिए ज्ञान ,कर्म और उपासना द्वारा (दशभि: सहस्रैर्वैश्वानर) समस्त प्रजा की प्रवृत्तियों की धर्म अर्थ और काम की उन्नति के लिए (अनस्वन्ता) उत्तम वाहनों से युक्त समाज, (मामहे) उपलब्ध कराओ.
Excellent cows should be ensured to build physically healthy, peaceful and high intellectual society. Current and Future planning should be based on experience of past working results, to obtain excellent Health, Mentality and Intellect in the nation to provide for a prosperous life style. Such a nation is self motivated in following the path of righteous behavior, charitable disposition and God loving conduct in their daily life.
Among other things excellent infrastructure of communication, transport should be provided.

Hundreds of well fed cows
2. 2.यो मे शता च विंशतिं च गोनां हरी च युक्ता सुधुरा ददाति ।
वैश्वानर सुष्टुतो वावृधानोऽग्ने यच्छ त्र्युरुणाय शर्म ।। RV 5.27.2
3. (वैश्वानर) धर्म अर्थ और काम को प्राप्त कराने वाली ऊर्जा और (वावृधान: अग्नि:) निरन्तर प्रगति देने वाले यज्ञ (त्र्यरुणाय) शरीर, मन और बुद्धि के लिए सेंकड़ों गौओं और बीसियों उत्तम शकटों से (हरी:) जितेंद्रिय पुरुषों से –भौतिक साधनों और श्रेष्ठ समाज से युक्त हो कर (शर्म यच्छ) विश्व का कल्याण प्राप्त करो
4. Urge for continuous strong positive motivation based activities in individuals creates a prosperous, peace loving, healthy, self disciplined sustainable society with hundreds of cows and dozens of carts loaded with green fodder for cows for aorganic food, and good infrastructure base. Nation provided with such infrastructure has a society that is rich in physical resources, and has well behaved people for welfare of the world.

Planning in Nation

3. एवा ते अग्ने सुमतिं चकानो नविष्ठाय नवमं त्रसदस्यु: ।
यो मे गिरस्तुविजातस्य पूर्वीर्युक्तेनाभि ष्ययरुणो गृणाति ।।RV 5.27.3
तेजस्वी विद्वान प्रकृति के विधान और अनुभव से प्राप्त ज्ञान के उपदेशों की कामना करता हुआ सब वासनाओं से मुक्त समाज के निर्माण द्वारा भविष्य के लिए उत्तम नवीन समाज की आवश्यकताओं की पूर्ती और तीनो प्रकार तम , मन और आत्मा से सुखी समाज का निर्माण करता है और सब से ऐसी विचार धारा का सम्मान करने को कहता है.
Bright enlightened intellectual leadership seeks guidance from Nature the environment friendly and traditional empirical wisdom to build a hedonism free culture for the growing needs and aspirations of future generations. By honoring and propagating such wisdom only an ideal and happy society is evolved.
Education in Nation

4. यो म इति प्रवोचत्यश्वमेधाय सूरये ।
दददृचा सनिं यते ददन्मेधामृतायते ।।RV 5.27.4
(राजा का दायित्व है कि ) जो विद्वद्जन (राष्ट्र की उन्नति के लिए) समाज में ऊर्जा (भौतिक और आत्मबल ) के विस्तार और सत्य असत्य के निर्णय करने मे समाज को सक्षम करने के वेद विद्यानुसार उपदेश करते हैं,उन को सम्माननीय पद दे और उन का सत्कार करे.
For growth of the nation it is responsibility of King recognize, honor and promote intelligent teachers that develop the society by educating it in growth conservation of physical energies and their mental energies, with ability to discern truth from untruth.
Bulls make excellent Nation
4. 5. यस्य मा परुषा: शतमुध्दर्षयन्त्युक्षण: ।
अश्वमेधस्य दाना: सोमा इव त्र्याशिर: ।। RV5.27.5
5. (यस्य मा शतम्‌ उक्षण: परुषा:) जो मेरे लिए , सेंकड़ो क्रोध से रहित सधे हुए वीर्य सेचन में समर्थ उत्तम वृषभ और कठिन परिश्रम साध्य बैल, (त्रयाशिर:) तीनों – बालक, युवा, वृद्ध तीनों प्रजाजनों के लिए – राष्ट्र में (अश्वमेध-ऊर्जा और मेधा) – तीनों वसु (भौतिक सुख के साधन) रुद्र रोगादि से मुक्त,आदित्य सौर ऊर्जा के द्वारा, तीनों दूध,दही और अन्न (सोमा: इव) श्रेष्ठ मानसिकता तीन प्रकार से शरीर को नीरोग,मन को निर्मल बुद्धि को तीव्र बनाते और (दाना:)इन दानों से (उद्धर्ष्यन्ति ) उत्कृष्ट उल्लास का कारण बनते हैं .
Bulls that have excellent breeding soundness for providing excellent cows and oxen that are strong and mild mannered to provide power to the nation
Provide excellent health nutrition and intellect to all the three ie. infants youth and old persons with three bounties of happiness ie. Healthy environments, cheerfulness and solar energy by the three items of cows milk, curds and organic food to provide the three bounties of healthy disease free life, positive attitudes in life and sharp intellect to spread happiness all round.

6. इन्द्राग्नी शतदाव्न्यश्वमेधे सुवीर्यम् ।
क्षत्रं धारयतं बृहद् दिवि सूर्यमिवाजरम् ।।RV 5.27.6
उत्साह और ऊर्जा से पूर्ण सदैव अपने लक्ष्य को प्राप्त करने मे विजयी, योग्य मनन युक्त आत्मज्ञान को धारण करने वाली परम बुद्धि से युक्त समाज, असङ्ख्य पदार्थों से सूर्य के सदृश उत्तम पराक्रम तथा बलयुक्त नाश से रहित महान राष्ट्र का निर्माण होता है.
Thus is created a Nation that is strong to protect itself from all destructive internal and external enemies, where the society consists of a prosperous, self motivated well behaved intelligent people.