मुंशी केवल कृष्ण

123      

मुन्शी केवल  कृष्ण 

डा अशोक आर्य

आर्य समज के आरम्भिक विद्वनों को आर्य समज के सिधान्तों तथा ऋषि  दयानन्द  जी के विचारों पर पूरी आस्था थी । इस का यह तात्पर्य नहीं  कि आज एसे विद्वान नहीं मिलते किन्तु यह सत्य है कि उस समय के विद्वान बिना किसी किन्तु परन्तु के आर्य समाज के लिए कार्य करते थे तथा सिधान्त से किंचित भी न हटते थे । एसे ही विद्वानों , एसे ही दीवानों में मुन्शी केवल कृष्ण जी भी एक थे । मुन्शी जी का जन्म मुन्शी राधाकिशन जी के यहां अश्विन पूर्णिमा १८८५ विक्रमी तद्नुसार सन १८२८ इस्वी को हुआ । इन की विरासत पटियाला राज्य के गांव छत बनूड से थी । भाव  यह है कि इन के पूर्वज बनूड के निवसी थे । परिस्थितिवश मुसलमनी शासन कल में  यह रोहतक आ कर रहने लगे ।

उस काल में मुसलमानी प्रभाव से हमारे हिन्दु लोगो में भी अनेक बुराइयां आ गई थीं । एसी ही बुराईयों के मुन्शी जी भी गुलाम हो गये थे । यह बुराईयां जो मुन्शी जी ने अपना रखी थीं , उनमें मांसाहार करना, मदिरा पान करना । इस सब के साथ ह साथ यह वैश्गयामन तक भी करने लगे थे ।

इन बुराईयों में फ़ंसे मुन्शी जी पर एक चमत्कार हुआ । हुआ यह कि इन दिनों ही स्वामी द्यानन्द सरस्वती का पंजाब में आगमन हुआ । । इन दिनों मुन्शी जी शाहपुर मे मुन्सिफ़ स्वरुप कार्य कर रहे थे । मुन्शी जी ने स्वामी जी के उपदेश सुने । इन उपदेशों पर मनन चिन्तन करने पर इन का मुन्शी जी पर अत्यधिक प्रभाव हुआ । वह स्वामी जी के उपदेशों से धुलकर शुद्ध हो गये । स्वामी  जी के प्रभाव से उन्होंने मांसाहार का सदा के लिए त्याग कर दिया , मदिरा के बर्तन उटा कर फ़ैंक दिये तथा भविष्य मे इस बुराई को भी अपने पास न आने देने का संकल्प लिया तथा वैश्यागमन , जो कि से  बडी बुराई मानी जती है , उसे भी परित्याग कर दिया । इस प्रकार स्वांमी जी के प्रभाव से मुन्शी जी शुद्ध व पवित्र हो गये ओर आर्य समाजी बन गये ।

जब कोई व्यक्ति भयानक बुराईयों को छोड कर सुपथ गामी बन जता है तो लोगो मे उस का आदर स्त्कार बट जाता है, उस की ख्यति दूर दूर तक जती है तथा जिस सधन से उसने यह दोष त्यागे होते हैं , अन्य लोग भी उसका अनुगमन करते हुए उस  पथ के पथिक बन जाते हैं । हुआ भी कुछ एसा ही ।

मुन्शी जी  ने अपने आप को आर्य समाज के सिद्धान्तों के साथ खूब टाला तथा इन्हे अपने जीवन का अभिन्न अंग बना लिया । आप ने यत्न पूर्वक उर्दू में परंगकता प्राप्त की तथा अपने समय के उर्दू के उ च्च कोटि के कवि बन गये । आप ने आर्य समाज के सिद्धान्तो व मन्तव्यों के प्रचार के लिए अनेक कवितायें लिखीं ।

मुन्शी जी अनेक वर्ष आर्य समाज गुजरांवाला के प्रधान भी रहे । आप के ही प्रभाव  से आप के भाई नारायण  कृष्ण भी  आर्य समाज को समर्पित हो गए तथा आप के सुपुत्र  कर्ता  कृष्ण भी अपने पिता  के अनुगामी बन कर आर्य समाज के सदस्य बन गए । जिस परिवार में कभी बुराईयों के कारण सदा कलह क्लेश रहता था , वह परिवार आज उत्तमता का ,स्वर्गिक आनंद का एक उदाहरण था  ।

जब लाहोर में डी.ए.वी कालेज की स्थापना हुई , उस समय इस संस्था को चलाने के लिए धन का आभाव सा ही रहता था । इस कमीं के दिनों में आपने कालेज के सहयोगी स्वरूप एक भारी धनराशी इसे सहयोग के लिए अपनी और से दी ।

आप उर्दु के सिद्ध हस्त कवि थे किन्तु आर्य समाज मे प्रवेश से पूर्व आप ने प्रचलित परम्परा को अपनाते हुए श्रंगारिक रचनायें ही लिखीं किन्तु आर्य समाज में प्रवेश के साथ ही जहां आप ने अपने जीवन की अनेक बुराईयों का त्याग किया  , वहां अपने काव्य को भी नया रूप दिया आप ने अब शृंगार रस को सदा के लिये त्याग दिया तथा इस के स्थान पर शान्त रस को अपना लिया । अब शान्त रस के माध्यम से आप उर्दू मे काव्य की रचना करने लगे । आप ने अपने काव्य में जो विशेष शब्द , जिन्हें तखलुस कहते हैं , वह उर्दू में ” उर्फ़” होता था जब कि हिन्दी मे ” केवल ” होता था ।

मुन्शी जी ने आर्य समाज के प्रचार प्रसार में अपनी लेखनी का भी खूबह सहारा लिया तथा अनेक पुस्तकें भी लिखी तथा  दिसम्बर १९०९ को इस जीवन लीला को समप्त कर चल बसे ।ध्यान मंजूम,आर्यभिविनय मंजूम, आर्य विनय पत्रिका ,संगीत सुधाकर, भजनमुक्तवली,इन पुस्तकों के अतिरिक्त कुछ एसी पुस्तकें भी लिखीं जो मांसहर आदि दुर्व्यस्नों तथा इन के परिणम स्वरुप होने वले झगडों आदि पर भी प्रकाश दलती हैं । एसी पुस्तकों में विचर पत्र, राजेसरबस्ता,हारेसदाकत या जबाबुलजुबाब आदि ।

इस प्रकर जीवन प्रयन्त  आर्य समाज की सेवा करने वाला यह दीवाना आर्य समज की सेवा करते हुए अन्त में १५ दिसम्बर १९०९ इस्वी को इस चलायमान जगत से चल बसा ।

 

पंडित काशीनाथ शास्त्री

123 

ओ३म

पण्डित काशीनाथ शास्त्री
डा. आशोक आर्य
पण्डित काशीनाथ शास्त्री आर्य समाज के उच्चकोटि के लेखकों व प्रचारकों में से एक थे । आप अपने जीवन का एक एक पल आर्य समाज के प्रचार व प्रसार के लिए ही लगाया करते थे । आप का जन्म गांव कोडा जहानाबाद जिला फ़तेहपुर में दिनांक १ मई १९११ इस्वी को हुआ था । आपके पिता श्री रघुनाथ जी थे ।
पण्डित जी के पिता जी अनुरूप ही द्रट सिधान्तवादी द्रट समाजी थे । पिता के विचारों का ही आप पर प्रभाव था , जिसके कारण आप न केवल आर्य हुए बल्कि सिद्धान्त वादी आर्य समाजी हुए तथा आर्य समाज के लिए कोई भी कुर्बानी देने के लिए तैयार रहते थे ।
अपने व्यवसाय के निमित आप फ़तेह्पुर छोड कर गोंदिया ( महाराष्ट्र के विदर्भ क्शेत्र) में चले गये । गोंदिया में आप आर्य समाज के स्तम्भ थे तथा यहां रहते हुए आप ने चिकित्सा का कार्य आरम्भ किया तथा इस व्यवसाय में ही आजीवन निर्वहन करते रहे ।
आपके नाम के साथ जो शास्त्री शब्द जुडा है , उससे स्पष्ट है कि शास्त्री तो आप ने उतीर्ण की ही थी किन्तु गोंदिया आने के पश्चात आप ने नागपुर विश्व विद्यालय से एम. ए. की परीक्शा भी उत्तीर्ण की । इससे पता चला है कि उच्च शिक्शा प्राप्ती के लिए आप निरन्तर प्रयत्नशील रहे ।
आर्य समाज मध्य प्रदेश व विदर्भ का कार्यालय नागपुर में है तथा इस का मुख पत्र आर्य सेवक भी यहां से निकलता है । इस पत्र के सम्पादक का कार्य आर्य समाज के उच्च कोटि के आर्य रहे हैं । हिन्दी की सुप्रसिद्ध कवयित्री सुभुद्रा कुमारी चौहान के पति भी इस पत्रिका के सम्पादक रहे हैं । हमारे पण्डित काशी नाथ शास्त्री भी अपनी उच्च हिन्दी व आर्य समाज समबन्धी योग्यता के कारण इस पत्र के सम्पादक रहे तथा इस पत्र को बहुत आगे ले गये ।
आप को आर्य समाज से इतनी लगन थी कि आर्य समाज के प्रचार व प्रसार के कार्य के लिए सभा की योजना के अनुरूप तो प्रचार करने जाते ही थे , इसके अतिरिक्त भी आप संलग्न क्शेत्रों में प्रचार के ;लिए घूमते ही रहते थे तथा युवकों को उत्साहित करते ही रहते थे । इस सम्बन्ध में जब मेरे श्वसुर लाला कर्मचन्द आर्य जी ने महाराष्ट्र के विदर्भ क्शेत्र के नगर भण्डारा में आर्य समाज की स्थापना की तो आप का इस समाज मं आना जाना आरम्भ हो गया तथा कर्मचन्द जी से पारिवारिक मित्रता का सम्बन्ध जुड गया । आप ही के प्रयत्न का परिणाम था कि मेरा सम्बन्ध इस परिवार से जुड गया । यह आप ही थे जिन्होंने मेरा विवाह संस्कार करवाया । इस अवसर पर पण्डित प्रकाश चन्द कविरत्न जी का रचा गया वैवाहिक सेहरा उन्हीं के शिष्य पं. पन्ना लाल पीयूष आर्योपदेशक जी ने पटा था ।
१२ जनवरी १९७५ से १४ जनवरी १९७५ तक नागपुर में प्रथम विश्व हिन्दी सम्मेलन हुआ । आप इस सम्मेलन में प्रतिनिधि स्वरुप सम्मिलित होने वाले थे । आप की प्रेरणा व प्रयत्न के परिणाम स्वरूप मुझे भी पंजाब के प्रतिनिधि स्वरूप इस सम्मेलन में सम्मिलित होने का अवसर व सौभाग्य प्राप्त हुआ । मैं जब भी भण्डारा जाता आप मुझे मिलने के लिए अवश्य ही भण्डारा आया करते थे ।
आप शुद्ध हिन्दी लेखव प्रयोग के पक्श में थे । उन्होंने मुझे बताया कि आज हम किस प्रकार से गलत टंग से हिन्दी श्ब्दों का प्रयोग कर रहे हैं कि हमें पता ही नहीं चलता । उन्होंने बताया कि आज स्कूलों में महिला अध्यापक के लिए अध्यापिका शब्द प्रयोग करते हैं किन्तु यह गल्त है । जिस प्रकार वकील की पत्नि को हम वकीलनी कहने लगते है ,जिसका भाव होता है वकील की पत्नी । इस प्रकार ही अध्यापिका का अर्थ हुआ अध्यापक की पत्नी । पटाने वालों के लिए केवल एक ही शब्द है और वह है अध्यापक , चाहे वह पुरूष हो या महिला ।
आपने आर्य समाज का प्रवचनों व लेखनी द्वारा खूब प्रचार किया तथा अनेक पुस्तकें भी लिखीं । आप की पुस्तकों में वैदिक संध्या, रामायण प्रदिप मीमांसा , जल्पवाद खण्डन ,आर्यों का आदि देश , सत्य की खोज, इसाइ मत की छानबीन , वैदिक कालीन भारत , अनुपम मणिमाला आदि थीं । वैदिक कालीन भारत पुस्तक में उन्हों ने भारतीय संस्क्रति का समग्र इतिहास दिया था , यह पुस्तक मुझे भी भेंट स्वरूप दी थी ।
आप का मध्यप्रदेश के होशंगाबाद में यदा कदा जाना होता ही था । एक बार जब आप होशंगाबाद गए हुए थे कि आक्स्मात दिनांक ४ आक्टूबर १९८८ इस्वी को देहान्त हो गया ।

 

Offensive Battles of Prophet of Islam

Muhammad in his entire life time undertook unlimited battles and fought some eight of them. [1] When we ask these things to an Islamic scholar that why the Prophet of Most Peaceful religion fought so many battles, their instant reply will be that these battles which Muhammad undertook and fought were all in self defense. Some Scholars even say that “not a single battle was offensive, or he (Muhammad) fought because Allah informed his messenger with the help of Archangel Gabriel that the Non-Believers were plotting and planning against him to kill him.”

But how can we trust these Scholars without going through the evidence of their claim. So in this article we will see that whether really Muhammad fought his battles in Self Defense or were offensive battles. Lets start with the Battle of Badr.

Battle of Badr

Background

This battle took place when Muhammad commanded some his men to go to the place called Nakhlah, which is situated between Makkah and At-Ta ‘ if and asked them to lie in wait for Quraish and bring their news. When these Muslims on command of Muhammad reached Nakhlah, they found a caravan of Quraish, which passed from near by. [2] The Quraish men in that Caravan were Amr Ibn Al-Hadrami, Uthman Ibn Abdullah, and his brother Naufal, and Al-Hakam Ibn Kaisan. When the Muslims saw these Quraish with their Caravan, they decided to attack them in the Prohibited month, and one of Muslim named Waqid Ibn Abdullah shot Al-Hadrami. Uthman Ibn Abdullah and Al-Hakim were captured and Naufal was successful in escaping from Muslims.[3]

When Muhammad came to know that his followers have looted the Caravan in prohibited month and killed one of the Quraish, he denied to take anything from the Loot. On this Allah suddenly revealed a verse, which is Qur’an Ch 2 Verse 217, which reads:-

They ask you about the sacred month – about fighting therein. Say, “Fighting therein is great [sin], but averting [people] from the way of Allah and disbelief in Him and [preventing access to] al-Masjid al-Haram and the expulsion of its people therefrom are greater [evil] in the sight of Allah . And fitnah is greater than killing.” And they will continue to fight you until they turn you back from your religion if they are able. And whoever of you reverts from his religion [to disbelief] and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter, and those are the companions of the Fire, they will abide therein eternally.

One of the famous commentator of Qur’an, Ibn Jalalayan says on this verse:-

Thus the Prophet (s) sent forth the first of his raiding parties under the command of ‘Abd Allāh b. Jahsh. They fought against the idolaters and killed [‘Amr b. ‘Abd Allāh] Ibn al-Hadramī in [the sacred month of] Rajab, thinking that it was the last day of Jumādā II. The disbelievers reviled them for making fighting lawful in a sacred month, and so God revealed the following: They ask you about the sacred, the forbidden, month, and fighting in it (qitālin fīhi, ‘fighting in it’, is an inclusive substitution [for al-shahri l-harāmi, ‘the sacred month’]). Say, to them: ‘Fighting (qitālun is the subject) in it is a grave thing (kabīr, ‘grave’, is the predicate), that is, heinous in terms of sin; but to bar (saddun is the subject), people, from God’s way, His religion, and disbelief in Him, in God, and, to bar from, the Sacred Mosque, that is, Mecca, and to expel its people, the Prophet (s) and the believers, from it — that is graver (the predicate of the [last] subject), [that is] more heinous in terms of sin than fighting in it, in God’s sight; and sedition, your idolatry, is graver than, your, slaying’, in it. They, the disbelievers, will not cease to fight against you, O believers, until, so that, they turn you from your religion, to unbelief, if they are able; and whoever of you turns from his religion, and dies disbelieving — their, good, works have failed, that is, they are invalid, in this world and the Hereafter. Thus they will not count for anything and will not result in any reward. The specification of death as a condition is because if that person were to return to Islam [again], his original deeds would not be invalidated, and he will be rewarded for them, and he would not have to repeat them, [deeds] such as [performing] the Pilgrimage: al-Shāfi‘ī is of this opinion. Those are the inhabitants of the Fire, abiding therein. [Source]

Here we see how Allah justifies killing of Quraish in prohibited month by saying that Non-Believers were the first to bar the way of Allah and were the reason of  Fitna, but when we look in to the historical context of the verse, we can clearly see that this verse was revealed only for Muhammad. As he denied to accept the booty, because his companions killed people of Quraish in prohibited month and the Jews and people of Quraish started opposing him and considering it as a bad omen. [4] So Muhammad took help of his lord, and made him justify killing of Al-Hadrami, so that he can take the 1/5 part of the war booty. ( As mentioned in Qur’an Ch 8 Verse 1)

So we see the background of the fight and it cannot be said that Muslims fought a defensive fight, as we clearly see that Muslims were the first to attack, kill and loot the Caravan and people of Quraish. After this incident Ibn Ishaq says, that Messenger of Allah heard Abu Sufyan Ibn Harb was coming from Syria, with large Caravan of Quraish, containing their money and merchandise, accompanied by some thirty or forty men. The Messenger of Allah summoned the Muslims and said,

“This is caravan of Quraish which contains their money. Go out to attack it; perhaps Allah will give it as a prey.” [5]

When Abu Sufyan came to know about Muhammad’s plan, he hired Damdam Ibn ‘Amr to go to Mecca to order Quraish to come out to save their property from Muhammad and his companions. In this context Ibn Kathir relates Bukhari narrating a hadith, Vol 5, Book 59, No 286, which reads:-

Abu Jahl addressed Sa`d saying, “I see you wandering about safely in Mecca inspite of the fact that you have given shelter to the people who have changed their religion (i.e. became Muslims) and have claimed that you will help them and support them. By Allah, if you were not in the company of Abu Safwan, you would not be able to go your family safely.” Sa`d, raising his voice, said to him, “By Allah, if you should stop me from doing this (i.e. performing Tawaf) I would certainly prevent you from something which is more valuable for you, that is, your passage through Medina.” On this, Umaiya said to him, “O Sa`d do not raise your voice before Abu−l−Hakam, the chief of the people of the Valley (of Mecca).” Sa`d said, “O Umaiya, stop that! By Allah, I have heard Allah’s Apostle predicting that the Muslim will kill you.” Umaiya asked, “In Mecca?” Sa`d said, “I do not know.” Umaiya was greatly scared by that news. When Umaiya returned to his family, he said to his wife, “O Um Safwan! Don’t you know what Sa`d told me? “She said, “What has he told you?” He replied, “He claims that Muhammad has informed them (i.e. companions that they will kill me. I asked him, ‘In Mecca?’ He replied, ‘I do not know.”Then Umaiya added, “By Allah, I will never go out of Mecca.” But when the day of (the Ghazwa of) Badr came, Abu Jahl called the people to war, saying, “Go and protect your caravan.” But Umaiya disliked to go out (of Mecca).

So it is clear by the above authentic narration that Quraish fought the battle of Badr to protect their property from looters and raiders of Prophet Muhammad.People of Quraish answered the call of Damdam and got ready to protect their property and money. On this occasion Quraish men said, “Do Muhammad and his companions think this is going to be like Caravan of  Ibn Hardami.” All most every man of Quraish went to fight Muhammad and his companions for saving their property.

Conclusion:-

This was the background of Muhammad’s fight of Badr and according to the evidence from canonical scriptures and biography of Muhammad we can now say without the shadow of Doubt that this fight of Muhammad was not defensive, but was very offensive. He tried to loot the caravans of Quraish and in that process his companions even killed some Quraish men and looted their property. Quraish fought back to protect their property and that too when Muhammad again tried to to loot their caravan. In this case Quraish were defensive, not Muhammad.

Now this is sufficient evidence to prove that Muhammad was a Looter, a Thug, and we can also discard the claim that he led a peaceful and simple life.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

References:-

[1] Battles of the Prophet by Ibn Kathir. Page No – 1 to 3

[2] IBID, Page No- 4 to 5

[3] Muhammad The Messenger of Allah, by Muhammad Ridha, Page No – 207

[4] Battles of the Prophet by Ibn Kathir. Page No – 7

[5] Ibid, Page No – 12

 [subscribe2]

Contribution of Swami Shraddhanad to Kerala Socio-religious-reform Movements

om swami

Contribution of Swami Shraddhanand to Kerala Socio-religious-reform Movements

By : KM Rajan

23 rd Dec is the martyrdom day of great educationalist, veteran freedom fighter and Vedic scholar, Swami Shraddhanand who was closely connected to socio-religious – reform movements in Kerala. But the glorious role played by him in Kerala during the first quarter of last century is missing from our history books. Mahatma Munshi Ram was born at Talwan Village in Jalandhar (Punjab) on February 2, 1856. The magic of great social reformer and vedic scholar, Maharshi Dayanand Saraswathi totally changed a spoiled young Munshiram (later Swamy Shradhanand) into an Arya Missionary and a national leader. He actively participated in freedom struggle and motivated many revolutionaries to fight against the alien rulers. He was the Chairman of reception committee of Amritsar Congress session in 1919 just after Jalyanwala Bagh massacre and successfully conducted this session. He established Gurukul Kangri with one teacher (himself) and two students (his two sons) which is now a famous university. He was the first non muslim to deliver sermon from the rampart of Jama Masjid of Delhi.

 

Above all he was a preacher of vedic dharma. He spearheaded the shudhi movement which resulted the return of thousands of converted Hindus to vedic religion. During the 1921 Malabar rebellion he came to Kerala for rescue works and brought back thousands of forcible converted Hindus to their parent religion. The Arya Samaj at Ponnani in Malappuram district was the main re-conversion centre during 1921 rebellion. Swamiji and his brave followers risked their life and gave a strong presence in Ponnani, the so called Mecca of Kerala to succor the poor Hindus. The hapless Hindus were massively converted by force there. At present also Ponnani is a main conversion centre to Islam.  The landed property and buildings of erstwhile Arya Samaj at Ponnani is now encroached by some one. When new Khilafat commemorative buildings are coming up in many parts of Malappuram district, there is no one to take up the case of this encroached historical Arya Samaj property which stood great relief for riot victims.

 

Swamy Shradhanand was also the inspirational force for upliftment of so called lower casts in Kalpathi village of Palakkad district. When these downtrodden people were denied their right to take part in yearly conducted Kalpathi Ratha Yathra, Swamiji took up the matter in the Court of Law and obtained a Judgment from Madras Court in their favour before the start of that year’s Rath Yathra.  He also actively participated in Vaikkom Sathyagrah. But it is very unfortunate that the contribution of Swamiji and other Arya Missionaries like Pt. Rishi Ram are missing in our history books. Even a photograph of Pt. Rishi Ram who established Calicut Arya Samaj also not available now in any historical libraries of Kerala. When there was a mass function to commemorate the 85th anniversary of Vaikkom Sathyagrah with much fanfare, there were not even a mention of Swamy Sradhanand and his colleagues. This is a great insult to those brave souls like Swamy Shradhanand who was behind the socio-religious reform movements in Kerala.

 

He established Bharatheeya Hindu Shudhi Sabha alongwith Pt.Madan Mohan Malavia in 1923. The shudhi movement spearheaded by Swamiji brought back lakhs of converted Hindus to Vedic Religion. This enraged the muslim extremists. As a result of that he succumbed to the stabbing by a fanatic Muslim named Abdul Rasheed on 23rd  Dec 1926. The British court sentenced Rasheed with death penalty. It was very unfortunate that Mahatma Gandhi (whom the honour ‘Mahatma’ was given my Swamy Shradhanand) sought relaxation for death sentence given to Abdul Rasheed from British authorities. But same Gandhiji refused to take up a similar case for great freedom fighters Shaheed Bhagat Singh, Sukh Dev and Rajguru. But the British authorities did not care Gandhiji’s suggestion and hanged the assassin of Swamy Shradhanand as per the court verdict.

 

Now Kerala is passing through a tough time. Mass conversion like love jihad etc.is going on in different parts of Kerala. In these circumstances let us pay homage to this immortal Arya Missionary and dedicate ourselves for the cause of propagation and protection of vedic dharma!

 

Om krinvantho vishwamaryam!

 

स्वामी दयानन्द एक महान व्यकितत्व…………..

 

dayanand

स्वामी दयानन्द एक महान व्यकितत्व………….. -शिवदेव आर्य

इतिहास साक्षी है कि जीवन की छोटी-छोटी घटनाओं से संवेदनशील व्यकितयों के जीवन की दिशा बदल जाती है। हम प्रतिदिन रोगी, वृध्द और मृत व्यकितयों को देखते हैं। हमारे ह्र्दय पर इसका कुछ ही प्रभाव होता है, परन्तु ऐसी घटनाओं को देखकर महात्मा बुध्द को वैराग्य हुआ। पेड़ों से फलों को धरती पर गिरते हुए किसने नहीं देखा, परन्तु न्यूटन ही ऐसा व्यकित था जिसने इसके पीछे छिपे कारण को समझा और ‘गुरुत्वाकर्षण के नियम का आविष्कार किया और प्रतिदिन कितने शिव भक्तों ने शिव मनिदर में शिव की पिंडी पर मिष्ठान्न का भोग लगाते मूषकों को देखा होगा, परन्तु केवल )षिवर दयानन्द के ही मन में यह जिज्ञासाजागृत हुर्इ कि क्या यही वह सर्वशकितमान, सच्चे महादेव हैं। जो अपने भोजन की रक्षा भी नहीं कर सकते हैं। इस घटना से प्रेरणा लेकर किशेार मूलशंकर सच्चे शिव की खोज के लिए अपनी प्यारी माँ और पिता को छोड़कर घर से निकल पड़े। मूलशंकर सच्चे शिव की खोज में नर्मदा के घने वनों, योगियों-मुनियों के आश्रमों, पर्वत, निर्झर, गिरिकन्दराओं में भटकता रहा। अलखनन्दा के हिमखण्डों से क्षतविक्षत होकर वह मरणासन्न तक हो गया परन्तु उसने अपने लक्ष्य को पाने का प्रयास नहीं छोड़ा। चौबीस वर्ष की आयु में पूर्णानन्द सरस्वती से संन्यास की दीक्षा लेकर मूलशंकर दयानन्द बन गए। अन्तत: इन्ही प्रेरणा से वे प्रज्ञाचक्षु दण्डी विरजानन्द के पास पहुँचे और तीन वर्ष तक श्री चरणों में ज्ञानागिन में तपकर गुरु की प्रेरणा से मानवमात्र के कल्याण एवं वेदों के उ(ार के लिए तथा अज्ञान-अन्धकार और समाज में व्याप्त कुरीतियों को दूर करने के लिए कार्यक्षेत्र में उतर पड़े। उस समय भारत में मुगल साम्राज्य का सूर्य अस्त हो गया था। और अंग्रेजों का आधिपत्य सम्पूर्ण भारत पर हो चला था। स्वामी दयानन्द इस विदेशी प्रभुत्व से अत्यधिक क्षुब्ध थे। जिसकी अभिव्यकित सत्यार्थ प्रकाश के अष्टम समुल्लास में हुर्इ। उन्होंने लिखा कि देश के लोग निषिक्रयता और प्रमाद से ग्रस्त हैं। लोगों में परस्पर विरेाध व्याप्त है और विदेशियों ने हमारे देश को गुलामी की जंजीरों में जकड़ा हुआ है इसलिए देशवासियों को अनेक प्रकार के दु:ख भोगने पड़ रहे हैं। यह ऐसा समय था जब देश मे ंसर्वत्र अज्ञान का अन्èाकार व्याप्त था। जनमानस अन्धविश्वासों और कुरीतियों से ग्रस्त था। अंग्रेजी शासकों ने भारतीय सभ्यता और संस्Ïति को समाप्त करने के लिए मैकाले की शिक्षानीति को लागू कर भारतवासियों में हीन भावना का संचार कर दिया था। निराश देशवासी पशिचमी राष्ट्रों की भौतिक समृध्दि की चकाचौंध से प्रभावित होकर अपने गौरवशाली, अतीत, धर्म, और जीवन के नैतिक मूल्यों से विमुख हो रहे थे। इसलिए उन्हें पाश्चात्य जीवन प्रणाली के अनुकरण में ही अपना हित मालूम होता था। ऐसी विकट परिसिथतियों में महर्षि ने आर्य समाज की स्थापना करके जर्जर निष्प्राण हिन्दू समाज में प्राण फूंकने का उसकी धार्मिक, सामाजिक, राष्ट्रीय एवं सांस्Ïतिक चेतना को उदबु( करने का प्रयास किया। नारी जाति की दुर्दशा को देखकर उनमें शिक्षा का प्रसार करने तथा अछूतों को हिन्दू समाज की मुख्यधारा में लाने और इस्लाम एवं र्इसाइयत में हिन्दुओं के धर्मान्तरण को रोकने का महत्वपूर्ण कार्य किया। )षि के जीवन का मुख्य उददेश्य वेदों का उत्तर और उसका प्रचार-प्रसार करना था उनका कहना था कि वेद ज्ञान भारत तक ही सीमित न रहे अपितु सम्पूर्ण विश्व में उसका प्रचार हो। उनका कहना था कि वेदों का ज्ञान किसी एक धर्म, जाति, सम्प्रदाय या देश के लिए नहीं है अपितु सम्पूर्ण मानव जाति के कल्याण के लिए है। इसीलिए उन्होंने ”Ïण्वन्तो विश्वमार्यम अर्थात सम्पूर्ण विश्व को श्रेष्ठ बनाने का सन्देश दिया है हमें उनके जीवन से प्रेरणा लेनी चाहिए। आओं! हम सब मिलकर उनके द्वारा दर्शाये मार्ग का अनुगमन कर स्वामी जी की कमी को पूर्ण करने का प्रयास करें।

Whether Christ is Omniscient By Chattampi Swamikal

make man of his image

Initial Creation

Oh! Christian preachers,

Why did Jehovah create the primeval man and woman devoid of discrimination? Had they discrimination, why did they eat the forbidden

fruit and fail to know that to refrain from doing forbidden things right and to do them is wrong? Why weren‟t they initially bestowed with the

knowledge of good and evil that they gained after eating the forbidden fruit?

Why did Jehovah plant a useless tree in the Garden of Eden where they were sent to live though they had no discrimination? Suppose a father brings home a pretty looking poisonous fruit, bids his children to stay away from it and in his absence the children get tempted, eat the fruit and fall sick, will you blame the children instead of the father? Similarly, would not the blame for the primeval man and woman turning sinners fall Jehovah instead of the man and woman?

Is Jehovah justified in not killing the man and woman after they ate the fruit forbidden by Him (though on eating the fruit they were to die on the same day)? If it was out of compassion for the man and woman, why didn‟t omniscient Jehovah foresee the events?

 

If eating forbidden fruit was to give knowledge of good and evil, is it not cheating on the part of Jehovah that He did not want them to acquire this knowledge? If it is said that it was not so, the tree had no power of bestowing such knowledge and that it was merely a symbol to indicate that abiding by Jehovah‟s commands is good and violating them is evil, this interpretation not being contained in the scripture cannot be accepted. The scripture further says, “After eating the forbidden fruit, their eyes opened”.

 

Why did Jehovah plant that tree in the Garden of Eden and forbid the man and woman from eating its fruit? If His purport was to make them realize that to obey His commands is good and to disobey them is bad, why did He give this command which was of no use to either Himself or others?

 

Had God provided them with discrimination at the time of creating them, they would have known that God is the ultimate cause and that it is good to obey Him and bad to violate. The tree of knowledge then becomes redundant. If Jehovah forbade man from eating the fruit of the tree in order to know whether or not the man would obey his command, it would mean He lacked foreknowledge and was, therefore, not omniscient.

 

If it is argued that Jehovah had given free will to man and man alone is responsible for his mistakes and that Jehovah was not to be blamed, it is not acceptable. For, if a father allows freedom to his innocent children and the children commit grave mistakes, who is to blame, the children or the father? Is He justified in giving freedom to persons devoid of discrimination? Can Satan have power to beguile and to bring to harm the man whom Jehovah created in His own image? If Jehovah was absent when Satan tempted the woman, it is evident that Jehovah is not  omnipresent. If He was not aware of that Satan was to tempt the woman, it is evident that Jehovah Is not omniscient. If He knew about Satan‟s intention, but failed to prevent the happenings, it is evident that Jehovah is not omnipotent. If He was aware of the happenings and allowed them to take place, it is evident that Jehovah is without compassion.

 

Can he who, even after seeing his child being attacked by a beast, does not try his best to rescue the child and remains quiet, be called a father? Never! Is it justified to consider Jehovah as father of all beings?

 

If intention of Jehovah was to punish Satan and redeem the man later, it can be deemed as an eccentric act, since it is unwise to acquire both disease and medicine.

 

It is said that it was Satan who spoiled man‟s mind. If it is so, there should have been an evil spirit who should have spoiled an angel‟s mind and turned him into Satan. Since there was no such spirit in existence at that time, Jehovah should be the evil spirit who spoiled everyone. Why did Jehovah curse the serpents as a whole while it was Satan who came in the form of serpent and beguiled men? Is it justified that the innocent serpents were victims of the curse whereas the actual culprits, i.e. Satan, the tree of knowledge and Jehovah who created them received no such curse?

While it was only the primeval men who disobeyed Jehovah‟s command, why did He decide to extend the curse on all their descendants? And the LORD was sorry that he had made humankind on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart. He was sorry that He made them – Genesis 6:6, 7.

Having created men of His own accord, why should Jehovah feel sorry about that? His sadness over the degradation of men from pure souls to sinners is understandable. After all, Men only turned into sinners and did not cause any other harm. But, in the case of Satan who was initially an angel created by God, not only did the angel sin and turn himself into Satan but he turned men also into sinners. Thus Jehovah ought to have felt sad about the grave misdeeds of Satan, which he did not, but He chose to worry about men‟s deeds. Why is it so? It can be concluded that if Jehovah could not foresee, at the time of creation, the occurrence of these troubles, He is not omniscient, if He had the foreknowledge of these events, He is devoid of compassion and His later repentance is only pretence.

 

If one knows the certain events will take place in certain manner, will he not decide a definite course of action to be taken to achieve the end? If so, won‟t everything happen as planned by Jehovah and not go awry? If it goes wrong won‟t it mean that Jehovah is devoid of omniscience and omnipotence? If nothing has gone wrong, it would mean that things happened as per Jehovah‟s design. So, there is no justice at all in attributing all sins to men instead of to Jehovah. There is scriptural evidence that everything was predetermined by God – According as he hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love – Ephesians 1-4, In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of Him who worketh all things after the counsel of His own will

Ephesians 1:11, And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to His purpose – Romans 8:28, For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be

conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren – Romans 8:29, Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he

justified, them he also glorified – Romans 8:30, Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain – Acts 2:23, What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction; And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory – Romans 9:22,23, But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth – Thessalonians 2:2:13.

 

It can be seen from the above that Jehovah had decided that things should occur in a certain manner. It is therefore clear that all ill occurrences

took place just as designed by Jehovah. Therefore, punishing the souls for the sins committed Jehovah is grave injustice.

 

From the above analysis of „initial creation‟, it is proved that Jehovah doesn‟t have characteristics of God.

 

Whether Crist is Omnipotence by Chattampi Swamikal

 

omnipotent

 Material Cause

 Oh! Christian preachers,

Does not your Bible say that Jehovah created the world out of void? Cause should always precede an effect. The effect is, however, contained in latent

form in the cause and it  becomes manifest when efficient cause comes into action later. For instance, the pot was in latent form in the clay and it  became manifest when the potter created it out of  clay. Bible mentions only efficient cause (Jehovah) for Creation which is an effect and is silent about material cause of Creation. This is no way logical.

 

If it is argued that God could create the world out of void because He is omnipotent, it doesn‟t fit. Omnipotence is the power to make everything function smoothly without any obstacles. Doing thing in an improper way instead of adopting right means is not a sign of omnipotence. For instance, to put a mountain within a mustard seed without changing their respective vastness and smallness is not possible. Not doing such a feat, doesn‟t strip God of His omnipotence. Otherwise, just because God doesn‟t have the power to create another omnipotent God or to destroy Himself, He would be deemed not omnipotent. Since this would not be acceptable to you,  creating world from a material cause would not take away God‟s  omnipotence.

If it is said that God Himself is both material cause and efficient cause of the world, it is not logical. Logic is that an effect is a modified material

cause. Just as the thread used to weave a white cloth should itself be white, the God, who is the material cause of the world which is both sentient

and insentient, should necessarily possess these characteristics. This is possible because one cannot possess opposite qualities at the same time.

Were God to be part sentient and part insentient, He would be comprised of parts, hence an effect and would cease to be the supreme cause. As per the basic dictum in logic, यद्यर्् सावयवम् र्त्तर्् कायतम्, यथा घटिटाद्दद, whatever is made up of parts isan effect such as pot, cloth, etc. From the above analysis of material cause of Creation, it is proved that Jehovah doesn‟t have characteristics of God.

Whether God is Selfish ? by Chattampi Swamikal

selfish

 Purpose of Creation

Oh! Christian preachers,

Jehovah created this world comprising of sentient and insentient beings. Logic is that every effect has a cause. So, this world, being an effect, must have a cause and therefore a purpose behind it because no one will do an action without a motive. “प्रयोजनमनुद्दिश्य न मन्दोऽिि प्रवर्तर्े” – even a fool does not act without a purpose. As regards whether the motive behind the Creation is selfish or unselfish, it is beyond any doubt that this Creation is only for the benefit of Jehovah as it is said in Bible that “for I have created him for my glory” (Isaiah 43:7). Moreover, as per basic principles of  Christianity there were no souls before the beginning of Creation and it cannot, therefore, be said that Creation was for the benefit of anyone else except Jehovah. The only alternative is that Jehovah created this world for His own benefit.

Jehovah, in the beginning, created two humans who were ignorant and were not endowed with pure knowledge, planted in their vicinity a tree which apparently was of no use, forbade them, with no justification, from eating the fruits of thistree and instead of prohibiting or destroying Satan,

Jehovah let him roam freely on Earth to tempt men. Misguided by Satan, the primeval men became deluded and being tempted for pleasure they

violated the divine command and thus became sinners.

Thereafter, without resorting to any other means of creating souls, God allowed all souls be born as progenies of primeval men who were sinners and so all the souls became sinners. Because they were sinners, they needed to be redeemed. Since Creation gave rise to sinners, it became the indirect cause for redemption. Ways of Salvation were also revealed as a form of testing the sinners. The souls were given life on Earth, which is subject to annihilation, so as to know as pure those souls who accept the means of Salvation and have the virtue of obeying God and know the

rest of the souls as impure and also about the reward and punishment they will be awarded in the next world. Creation as well as annihilation, thus, necessitates divine Grace. In order to instil fear in the pure souls in Heaven so that they do not stray from their devotion to Jehovah, punishments

are inflicted upon impure souls to suffer endlessly. Thus, souls seek redemption out of fear of punishment in Hell. Those thus redeemed will

praise God and He will shine in all His glory.Ultimate object is Jehovah‟s gratification. It can be concluded from the above that the purpose behind

the Creation was selfishness of Jehovah.

Because Jehovah created the world so that the souls will know His glory, praise Him and bow down to Him with fear and He will shine in all His

glory, it can be concluded that before the creation of the world Jehovah did not shine in all His glory. He saw this surely as a limitation in Him and

desiring to remove this inadequacy, He proceeded to create the world.

If His glory was complete before the creation, then it was needless to do a deed to increase His glory. This deed, if it was meant to reveal His glory

to the souls, was not devoid of selfishness.

Neither could He have created world to reveal His glory for the sake of the souls, because that will  contradict the fact that there were no souls  before the creation of the world.

Had Jehovah desired to augment His glory by shining through the souls He was going to create, the acts of shining and creation will become

mutually cause and effect and this will lead to a logical fallacy known as “mutual dependency –anyonyashrayam”.

Because He Himself was there to experience His glory, it would be improper to say that Jehovah‟s glory was shining completely prior to

creation but remained unappreciated and He created souls so that they will experience and praise His glory. Whatever way we may view at it,

we can conclude that Jehovah did feel an inadequacy as His glory was not shining. Because He had a sense of inadequacy, He cannot be whole

(poorna); because He worried about the inadequacy and tried to remove it, He cannot be eternally Joyful; because He started creation for His own joy, He has attachment or aversion towards that which pleases or displeases Him and thus He is suffering from delusion which is the root cause of attachment and aversion; because He did not know the means to remove his inadequacy in the beginning, he did not have beginning-less

knowledge; because He did not create the souls in the beginning, he does not have beginning-less doership; because He acquired doership later, his

doership is an „effect‟ and there must be another person as its „cause‟; because He gained „doership‟ from someone else He does not possess

sovereignty; because He lost His nature by gaining „doership‟ from someone, He is not changeless; because He is neither changeless nor adequate, He is neither without a beginning nor is He eternal or

pervading; because He created souls for His own joy and caused them to commit sin and suffer in eternal Hell, He is bereft of justice, compassion and goodness; because He did not know which souls were pure and had to find this out by testing them by giving them commandments after they were made to take birth on Earth as sinners, He is without omniscience; because He could neither be joyful nor the make souls praise Him without

making them sinners and causing them sorrow, it is evident that He is without omnipotence. Since He has defects such as inadequacy, sorrow, desire, hatred, delusion, dependence, changeability, nonpervading,

injustice, hard-heartedness, vice, limited knowledge and limited power, Jehovah does not possess Godliness. He is proved to be a sinner. Since our8 scriptures declare that these defects are the results of the bondage of “ego,

karma and Maya9”, Jehovah is indeed subject of bondage and therefore not independent. When we analyze the above characteristics of Jehovah from

the standpoint of Saiva Siddhanta10, it could be concluded that Jehovah is a mere being (pashu) who, as per karmas accumulated from His past lives, is born with a physical body; is subject to limitations in knowledge, power and capacity to experience joy and sorrow and dies at the end of his life term like any other human being.

It is the opinion of some Christian scholars that Jehovah from time immemorial had made a resolve, without any reason, to create the world at a certain point of time, at a certain location and in a certain manner and that accordingly He created the world, without any reason, at a certain point of time. But this is not acceptable because it is not  contained in Bible and is contradictory to scriptural statements such as “I made man for my glory”.

If it is true Jehovah had the resolve from time immemorial, without any reason, to create the world at a certain point of time, at a certain location and in a certain manner, He should have had a similar resolve regarding sustenance and annihilation of the world. This implies that Jehovah will grant Heaven or Hell to souls as per the above resolve and not based on their sins or merits. Souls need not strive to become worthy of Salvation and the Bible, which bids the souls to have faith and make efforts towards this end, bears therefore no relevance. Therefore, Jehovah who revealed Bible to the world is unwise. Some might say that it is not befitting the

souls to question the purpose behind God‟s creation and that God‟s actions are beyond human logic. This would give rise to logical fallacy known as “anishtaprasangam”. Persons belonging to every religion would hold their scriptures as God‟s own words. If anyone, after a critical study of scriptures of a religion, points out any flaw and declares them as false and worth rejecting, he is countered with an argument by the faithful of that religion that scriptures are God„s work and are beyond the logic of souls whose knowledge is limited and that God can act as per His wish. If so, all religions have to be considered as true and equal. The Christians‟ claim that their religion is the only true religion does not therefore hold water.

If one says that purpose of creation is beyond comprehension of souls it cannot be accepted as Bible clearly states Jehovah made this word for His glory. For that matter, no scripture deals with subjects which are incomprehensible. In spite of Jehovah‟s admitting creation of world for His own glory, if one says that purpose of creation is beyond words, it is equivalent to one calling his mother barren. From the above analysis of purpose of Creation, it is proved that Jehovah doesn‟t have characteristics of God.

 

 

ओउम नाम की माला लेकर, फूल हमेशा खिलते हैं |

भला किसी क कर न सको तो ,बुरा किसी का मत करना ।
पुष्प नहीं बन सकते तो तुम, कांटे बनाकर मत रहना ।।
बन न सको भगवान अगर तुम , कम से कम इंसान बनो ।
नहीं कभी शैतान बनो तुम, नहीं कभीहैवान बनो ।।
सदाचार अपना न सको तो , पापों में पग मत धरना ।।
सत्य वचन न बोल सको तो, झूठ कभी भी मत बोलो ।।
मौन रहो तो ही अच्छा कम से, कम,विष तो मत घोलो ।
बोली यदि पहले तुम तोलो तो , फिर मुंह को खोला कारो ।।
घर न किसी का बसा सको तो , झोंपड़ियाँ न जला देना ।
मरहम पट्टी कर न सको तो, घाव नमक न लगा देना ।।
दीपक बनाकर जल न सको तो ,अंधियारा भी मत करना ।।
अम्रात पिला सको न किसी को ,जहर पिलाते भी डरना ।
धीरज बंधा नहीं सकते तो, घाव किसी के मत करना ।।

ओउम नाम की माला लेकर , फूल हमेशा खिलते हैं ।।
सच्चाई की रह में बेशक, कष्ट अनेकों मिलते हैं ।
पर काँटों के बीच में देखो , फूल हमेशा खिलते हैं ।।
सूरज की भांति खुद जलाकर , सब जग को रोशन करना ।।पुष्प …

भजन कविता

सब के गुण , अपनी हमेशा गलतियाँ देखा करो |

जिन्दगी की हुबहू तुम झलकियाँ देखा करो ||

 

हसरतें महलों की तुमको गर सताएं आनकर |

कुछ गरीबों की भी जाकार बस्तियां देखा करो ||

 

खाने से पहले अगर तुम हक़ पराया सोच लो |

कितने भूखों की है इन में रोटियां देखा करो ||

 

आ दबोचें, गर कहीं तुम को सिकंदर सा गरूर |

हाथ खाली आते जाते अर्थियां देखा करो ||

 

ये जवानी की अकाद सब ख़ाक में मिलाजावेगी |

जल चुके जो शव हैं उनकी अस्थियाँ देखा करो ||

 

जिंदगी में चाहते हो सुख अगर अपने लिए दूसरों के गम में अपनी सिसकियाँ देखा करो |

मिलाजावेगी जल चुके जो शव हैं उनकी अस्थियाँ देखा करो ||

 

जिंदगी में चाहते हो सुख अगर अपने लिए ,

दूसरों के गम में अपनी सिसकियाँ देखा करो ||